Concrete Water Footprint Assessment Methodologies

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concrete is the single most widely used material in the world and is only surpassed by water in terms of consumption. By 2013, 4 billion tonnes of Portland cement were produced worldwide, enough to produce about 32 billion tonnes of concrete, which represents more than 4.6 tonnes of concrete per person per year. The high water consumption and large amount of wastewater generated in the concrete industry has become a very important environmental issue. Due to the large global use of concrete, it is essential to correctly assess the environmental impacts of this material including impacts related to water consumption. Life cycle perspective is important because it allows identifying and reducing water related potential environmental impacts associated with products. In concrete life cycle assessment, these impacts are not considered mostly because of lack of data. There are several methodologies for water footprint assessment, as The Water Footprint Assessment Tool and the ISO 14046:2014 standard -that is based on life cycle assessment (ISO 14044)-, as well as sustainable reporting guidelines, which include water assessment for organizations. The aim of this paper is to evaluate existing water footprint methodologies based on life-cycle assessment, their concepts and difficulties, and link them to concrete industry. Out of at least eighteen existing water footprint methodologies, it was found that four of them are feasible for cement based materials industry, however there are differences between the definitions and criteria adopted by each methodology.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

247-254

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. J. M. Flower and J. G. Sanjayan, Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 12, no. 5, p.282–288, (2007).

DOI: 10.1065/lca2007.05.327

Google Scholar

[2] CEMBUREAU, WORLD CEMENT PRODUCTION 2013, BY REGION AND MAIN COUNTRIES., (2014).

Google Scholar

[3] C. Meyer, The greening of the concrete industry, Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 31, no. 8, p.601–605, (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] J. H. Bodley, Anthropology and Contemporary Human Problems. Rowman Altamira, (2012).

Google Scholar

[5] Bryson Bates, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Shaohong Wu, and Jean Palutikof, Climate Change and Water., Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, Jun-(2008).

Google Scholar

[6] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14046: 2014 Environmental management - Water footprint - Principles, requirements and guidelines., (2014).

Google Scholar

[7] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14040: 2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework., (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14044: 2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines., (2006).

DOI: 10.3403/30290345

Google Scholar

[9] A. Petek Gursel, E. Masanet, A. Horvath, and A. Stadel, Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review, Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 51, p.38–48, Aug. (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005

Google Scholar

[10] G. Cicas, C. T. Hendrickson, A. Horvath, and H. S. Matthews, A regional version of a US economic input-output life-cycle assessment model, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 12, no. 6, p.365–372, Sep. (2007).

DOI: 10.1065/lca2007.04.318

Google Scholar

[11] A. Petek Gursel, E. Masanet, A. Horvath, and A. Stadel, Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review, Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 51, p.38–48, Aug. (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005

Google Scholar

[12] P. Van den Heede and N. De Belie, Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and 'green' concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations, Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 34, no. 4, p.431–442, Apr. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.004

Google Scholar

[13] J. Reap, F. Roman, S. Duncan, and B. Bras, A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 13, no. 5, p.374–388, Aug. (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9

Google Scholar

[14] Arjen Y. Hoekstra, Ashok K. Chapagain, Maite M. Aldaya, and Mesfin M. Mekonnen, Water Footprint Manual. State of the Art 2009., Nov-(2009).

Google Scholar

[15] A.K. Chapagain and A.Y. Hoekstra, Water footprints of nations, vol. 1: Main Report. (2004).

Google Scholar

[16] Roberto Rodríguez Casado, Alberto Garrido Colmenero, Manuel Ramón Llamas Madurga, and Consuelo Varela-Ortega, La huella hidrológica de la agricultura española, Fundación Marcelino Botín. Madrid, España, (2008).

DOI: 10.4995/ia.2009.2943

Google Scholar

[17] ISO 14046: 2014 - Environmental management - Water footprint - Principles, requirements and guidelines., British Standards Institution, (2014).

Google Scholar

[18] Portland Cement Association, Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete., (2002).

Google Scholar

[19] Medgar L. Marceau, Michael A. Nisbet, and Martha G. VanGeem, Life cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Manufacture, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, (2006).

Google Scholar

[20] The Cement Sustainability Initiative. 10 years of progress and moving on into the next decade., (2012).

Google Scholar

[21] Holcim's SD performance in 2012., (2012).

Google Scholar

[22] Sustainability Report. LAFARGE 2012., (2012).

Google Scholar

[23] LAFARGE. Sustainability 11th Report 2011., (2011).

Google Scholar

[24] HOLCIM Corporate Sustainable Development Report 2011., (2011).

Google Scholar

[25] A. R. Chini, B. S. Ellis, L. C. Muszynski, and M. Bergin, Reuse of wastewater generated at concrete plants in Florida in the production of fresh concrete, Mag. Concr. Res., vol. 53, no. 5, p.311–319, Jan. (2001).

DOI: 10.1680/macr.2001.53.5.311

Google Scholar

[26] M. Paolini and R. Khurana, Admixtures for recycling of waste concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 20, no. 2–3, p.221–229, (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(97)00066-8

Google Scholar

[27] S. O. Ekolu and A. Dawneerangen, Evaluation of recycled water recovered from a ready-mix concrete plant for reuse in concrete, J. South Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng., vol. 52, no. 2, p.77–82, (2010).

Google Scholar

[28] B. J. Sealey, P. S. Phillips, and G. J. Hill, Waste management issues for the UK ready-mixed concrete industry, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 32, no. 3–4, p.321–331, Jul. (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-3449(01)00069-6

Google Scholar

[29] Medgar L. Marceau, Michael A. Nisbet, and Martha G. VanGeem, Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, (2007).

Google Scholar

[30] N. Ružinski, N. Koprivanec, S. Dobrović, G. Stefanović, S. Tsimas, and M. Zervaki, Reuse of waste water from ready‐mixed concrete plants, Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J., vol. 22, no. 1, p.7–17, Jan. (2011).

DOI: 10.1108/14777831111098444

Google Scholar

[31] H. M. de Paula, M. S. de Oliveira Ilha, and L. S. Andrade, Concrete plant wastewater treatment process by coagulation combining aluminum sulfate and Moringa oleifera powder, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 76, p.125–130, Aug. (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.031

Google Scholar

[32] J. Borger, R. L. Carrasquillo, and D. W. Fowler, Use of recycled wash water and returned plastic concrete in the production of fresh concrete, Adv. Cem. Based Mater., vol. 1, no. 6, p.267–274, Nov. (1994).

DOI: 10.1016/1065-7355(94)90035-3

Google Scholar

[33] B. Chatveera, P. Lertwattanaruk, and N. Makul, Effect of sludge water from ready-mixed concrete plant on properties and durability of concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 28, no. 5, p.441–450, May (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.01.001

Google Scholar

[34] B. Chatveera and P. Lertwattanaruk, Use of ready-mixed concrete plant sludge water in concrete containing an additive or admixture, J. Environ. Manage., vol. 90, no. 5, p.1901–1908, Apr. (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.008

Google Scholar

[35] N. Su, B. Miao, and F. -S. Liu, Effect of wash water and underground water on properties of concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 32, no. 5, p.777–782, May (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(01)00762-1

Google Scholar

[36] F. Sandrolini and E. Franzoni, Waste wash water recycling in ready-mixed concrete plants, Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 31, no. 3, p.485–489, Mar. (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00468-3

Google Scholar

[37] World Business Council for Sustainable and Development (WBCSD), Water for Business: Initiatives guiding sustainable water management in the private sector., Aug-(2012).

Google Scholar

[38] The water footprint network, Upgraded Water Footprint Assessment Tool launched to help solve global water problems., Jul-(2014).

Google Scholar

[39] Water impact management., [Online]. Available: http: /www. wbcsdcement. org/index. php/key-issues/water. [Accessed: 25-May-2014].

Google Scholar

[40] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14025: 2006 Environmental labels and declarations - Type III environmental declarations - Principles and procedures., (2006).

DOI: 10.3403/30101513u

Google Scholar

[41] WBCSD Cement Sustainability Initiative, PCR 2013: 02 UN CPC 375 Concrete., 12-Feb-(2013).

Google Scholar

[42] CBCS, Projeto Avaliação de Ciclo de Vida Modular de Blocos e Pisos de Concreto., (2014).

DOI: 10.11606/d.3.2016.tde-13072016-152611

Google Scholar