Collapsed Mode and Specific Energy Absorption of Glass Filled Polypropylene (GPE) and Glass Filled Polyethylene (GPP) Composite Pipes under Quasi-Static Axial Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

–The behaviour of extruded glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic pipe under axial crushing load was investigated experimentally. It was envisaged that the difference between the axial and hoop moduli and strengths as well as the volume fraction would influence the mode of collapses and energy absorption. The moduli could be varied using a new extrusion technology, which controls the fibre orientation pattern, hence, the mechanical properties. The ability to vary the moduli and the fibre volume fraction provide means of controlling the collapse mode in order to optimise specific energy absorption. Axial compression tests were performed on glass filled Polypropylene and Polyethylene composite pipes. The samples were chosen with a variety of fibre volume fraction, Vf = 5% to 20% and average angle of orientation, θ = 50o to 80o to evaluate the effect of anisotropy and Vf on the energy absorption capacity and collapse modes. The observations indicate that, the samples containing of higher Vf and θ, collapsed in brittle failure mode (fragmentation), while those with less Vf and θ angle collapsed in non-axis-symmetric (diamond) mode with local fracture. The galss fillet with polypropylene-60o (GPP-60) displayed the highest specific energy absorption (Es) compared to the other GPE, MDPE and LDPE pipe samples. However, the glass fillet polyethylene – 75o (GPE-75) displayed the highest Es and the glass fillet polyethylene – 65o (GPE-65) displayed the lowest Es compared with in the GPE pipes. The specific energy absorption of GPP-70 pipe (24 kJ/kg) and GPE-75 pipe (12 kJ/kg) is almost 50 % and 25% of the amount of specific energy absorption of aluminium tubes (60 kJ/kg), respectively. Moreover, it is close to the specific energy absorption of glass-epoxy 15o (GE-15) / which is 30 kJ/kg, and much higher than aramid-epoxy-15o (AE-15)/ which is 9 kJ/kg.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

141-149

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hull D (1983), Axial crushing of fiber reinforced composite tube. In Structural Crasworthiness, N. Jones and T. Wierzbicki, Butterworth, London, 35-118.

Google Scholar

[2] Thornton PH (1979), Energy absorption in composite structures. J. Composite Mat. 13, 247-262.

Google Scholar

[3] Farley GL (1986), The effect of fibres and maximum strain on the energy absorption of composite materials. J. Composites Mat. 20, 322-334.

Google Scholar

[4] Schmueser DW and Wickcliffe LE (1987), Impact energy absorption of continuous fibre composite tubes. J Eng. Mat. Tech., 109, 72-77.

Google Scholar

[5] Price JN & Hull D (1988), Crushing behaviour of square section of glass fibre polyester tube. In How to apply advance composite tech. ASM International, 1988, 53-61.

Google Scholar

[6] Price J.N. & Hull D. (1987), Axial crushing of glass fibre-polyester composite cones. Composite Sc. Tech. 28, 30-211.

DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90003-0

Google Scholar

[7] Thornton PH and Jeryan RA (1988), Crash energy management in composite automotive structures. Int. J. Impact Eng. Mat. 7, 167-180.

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(88)90024-3

Google Scholar

[8] Mamalies AG, Manolakos, DE and Viegelahn GL (1989), The axial crushing of thin PVC tubes and frusta of square cross section. Int. J. Impact. Eng. 8, 4-241.

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(89)90005-5

Google Scholar

[9] Carruthers J. J, Kettle A.P. and Robinson A.M. (1998), Energy absorption capability and crashwortiness of composites. Appl. Mech. Rev. Vol. 51, 10.

Google Scholar

[10] Mamalies A.G., 1997 Crashworthy capacity of composite materials. Comp. Struc. 37, 109-134.

Google Scholar

[11] Hull D (1991), A unified approach to progressive crushing of fibre-reinforced composite tubes, Comp. Sci. and Tech. 40, 377-421.

DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(91)90031-j

Google Scholar

[12] Farley GL (1983), Energy absorption of composite materials. J. Comp. Mat., 17, 267-279.

Google Scholar

[13] Thorton, PH and Edwards PJ (1982), Energy Absorption in composite tubes. J. Comp. Mat., 16, 521-45.

Google Scholar

[14] Farley GL and Jones (1992), Crushing Characteristic of continuous fibre-reinforced composite tubes. J. Comp. Mat., 26: 37-50.

Google Scholar

[15] Farley GL (1986), The effect of fibre and matrix maximum strain on energy absorption of composite materials, J. Comp. Mat. 20, 322-334.

DOI: 10.1177/002199838602000401

Google Scholar

[16] Mamalies AG. (1991), On the axial crushing of fibre-reinforced composite thin-walled cornical shell. Int. J. Vehicle Des. 12, 450-467.

Google Scholar

[17] Farley GL (1986), Effect of specimens geometry on energy absorption capability of composite materials. J. Comp. Mat. 20, 390-400.

Google Scholar

[18] Farley GL and Jones RM (1992), Crush characteristic of composite tubes with near elliptical cross-section. J. Comp. Mat. 13, 37-50.

Google Scholar

[19] Hull D (1981, 1996), An Introduction to composites Materials. 2nd. Edition, Cambridge.

Google Scholar