Numerical Simulation of Powder Dispersion Performance by Different Mesh Types

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of mesh type on numerical simulating the dispersion performance of micro-powders through a home-made tube. METHODS With the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, a powder dispersion tube was meshed in three different types, namely, tetrahedral, unstructured hexahedral and prismatic-tetrahedral hybrid meshes. The inner flow field and the kinetic characteristics of the particles were investigated. Results of the numerical simulation were compared with literature evidences. RESULTS The results showed that using tetrahedral mesh had the highest computational efficiency, while employing the unstructured hexahedral mesh obtained more accurate outlet velocity. The simulation results of the inner flow field and the kinetic characteristics of the particles were slightly different among the three mesh types. The calculated particle velocity using the tetrahedral mesh had the best correlation with the changing trend of the fine particle mass in the first 4 stages of the new generation impactor (NGI) (R² = 0.91 and 0.89 for powder A and B, respectively). Conclusions Mesh type affected computational time, accuracy of simulation results and the prediction abilities of fine particle deposition.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 680)
• Pages: 82-85
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.680.82
• Online since: February 2016
• Authors: Jian Cai, Lan Chen*, Umezuruike Linus Opara
• Keywords: Dispersion Tube, Mesh Type, Numerical Simulation, Powder

References

[1] K. Saleh, M. -T. M. A. Jaoude, M. Morgeneyer, E. Lefrancois, O. Le Bihan, J. Bouillard, Dust generation from powders: A characterization test based on stirred fluidization. Powder Technology. 255 (2014) 141–148.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.10.051

[2] G. Calvert, M. Ghadiri, R. Tweedie, Aerodynamic dispersion of cohesive powders: A review of understanding and technology. Advanced Powder Technology. 20 (2009) 4-16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2008.09.001

[3] H. Masuda, Dry dispersion of fine particles in gaseous phase. Advanced Powder Technology. 20 (2009) 113–122.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2009.02.001

[4] M. Taki, C. Marriott, X. -M. Zeng, G.P. Martin, Aerodynamic deposition of combination dry powder inhaler formulations in vitro: A comparison of three impactors. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 388 (2010) 40-51.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.12.031

[5] T. Suwandecha, W. Wongpoowarak, K. Maliwan, T. Srichana, Effect of turbulent kinetic energy on dry powder inhaler performance. Powder Technology 267 (2014) 381–391.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.07.044

[6] Z.B. Tong, S. Adi, R.Y. Yang, H.K. Chan, A.B. Yu, Numerical investigation of the de-agglomeration mechanisms of fine powders on mechanical impaction. Journal of Aerosol Science 42 (2011) 811–819.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.07.004

[7] L. Chen, R. -L. Heng, M. A. Delele, J. Cai, D. -Z. Du, U. L. Opara, Investigation of dry powder aerosolization mechanisms in different channel designs. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 457 (2013) 143-149.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.09.012

[8] P. -P. Ji, J. -P. Chen, ANSYS ICEM CFD, meshing example and explanation. China Water Power Press, 2013 98-107.