Formation of Carbonated Apatite Layer in 1.5× Simulated Body Fluid at Different Refreshing Time

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bioactivity analysis in simulated body fluid (SBF) is an experiment or protocol conducted to evaluate the bioactive properties of a sample without involving cells. The bioactive property is claimed based on the formation of apatite layer after immersion in SBF. This analysis consumes expensive chemical reagents and requires complex procedure in preparing and refreshing the solution. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify significant alteration of refreshing time in the 1.5× SBF to form an apatite layer on a polydopamine (PDA) grafted stainless steel (SS316L) disk. The SS316L disks were pre-treated and grafted with a PDA layer to equip the bioinert metal surface with a bioactive film. The PDA grafted disks were subjected to bioactivity analysis in SBF for 7 days at different refreshing time (24 h, 48 h, 72 h and not refreshed up to 7 d). The surfaces were then characterised by FTIR, SEM-EDX, and contact angle analyses to determine its chemical composition, morphology and wettability properties. The PDA grafted disks that been subjected to 48 h refreshing time in SBF produced homogenous apatite formation with less agglomeration, closest theoretical Ca/P ratio and high hydrophilicity, suggesting the formation of preferable apatite layer with a reduction in the number of refreshing time.Bioactivity analysis in simulated body fluid (SBF) is an experiment or protocol conducted to evaluate the bioactive properties of a sample without involving cells. The bioactive property is claimed based on the formation of apatite layer after immersion in SBF. This analysis consumes expensive chemical reagents and requires complex procedure in preparing and refreshing the solution. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify significant alteration of refreshing time in the 1.5× SBF to form an apatite layer on a polydopamine (PDA) grafted stainless steel (SS316L) disk. The SS316L disks were pre-treated and grafted with a PDA layer to equip the bioinert metal surface with a bioactive film. The PDA grafted disks were subjected to bioactivity analysis in SBF for 7 days at different refreshing time (24 h, 48 h, 72 h and not refreshed up to 7 d). The surfaces were then characterised by FTIR, SEM-EDX, and contact angle analyses to determine its chemical composition, morphology and wettability properties. The PDA grafted disks that been subjected to 48 h refreshing time in SBF produced homogenous apatite formation with less agglomeration, closest theoretical Ca/P ratio and high hydrophilicity, suggesting the formation of preferable apatite layer with a reduction in the number of refreshing time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

304-308

Citation:

Online since:

August 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Talha, C.K. Behera, O.P. Sinha, A review on nickel-free nitrogen containing austenitic stainless steels for biomedical applications, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 33 (2013) 3563-3575.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.06.002

Google Scholar

[2] M. Kamitakahara, C. Ohtsuki, T. Miyazaki, Coating of bone-like apatite for development of bioactive materials for bone reconstruction, Biomed. Mater., 2 (2007) R17-R23.

DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/2/4/r01

Google Scholar

[3] J. Faig-Martí, F.J. Gil-Mur, Hydroxyapatite coatings in prosthetic joints, Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition), 52 (2008) 113-120.

DOI: 10.1016/s1988-8856(08)70080-4

Google Scholar

[4] I. Ortega-Oller, M. Padial-Molina, P. Galindo-Moreno, F. Valle, A.B. dar-Reyes, Peula-Garc, J.M., Bone Regeneration from PLGA Micro-Nanoparticles, BioMed. Res. Int., 2015 (2015) 18.

DOI: 10.1155/2015/415289

Google Scholar

[5] J. Ryu, S.H. Ku, H. Lee, C.B. Park, Mussel-Inspired Polydopamine Coating as a Universal Route to Hydroxyapatite Crystallization, Adv. Funct. Mater., 20 (2010) 2132-2139.

DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200902347

Google Scholar

[6] H. Lee, Y. Lee, A.R. Statz, J. Rho, T.G. Park, P.B. Messersmith, Substrate-independent layer-by-layer assembly by using mussel-adhesive-inspired polymers, Adv. Mater., 20 (2008) 1619-1623.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.200702378

Google Scholar

[7] J. Ou, J. Wang, J. Zhou, S. Liu, Y. Yu, X. Pang, S. Yang, Construction and study on corrosion protective property of polydopamine-based 3-layer organic coatings on aluminum substrate, Prog. Org. Coat., 68 (2010) 244-247.

DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.01.004

Google Scholar

[8] K. Anselme, Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials, Biomater, 21 (2000) 667-681.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Bohner, J. Lemaitre, Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution?, Biomater, 30 (2009) 2175-2179.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.008

Google Scholar

[10] S. Qi, Y. Huang, Q. Lin, H. Cheng, H.J. Seo, A bioactive Ca2SiB2O7 ceramics and in vitro hydroxyapatite mineralization ability in SBF, Ceram. Int., 41 (2015) 12011-12019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.013

Google Scholar

[11] F. Barrere, M.M.E. Snel, C.A. van Blitterswijk, K. de Groot, P. Layrolle, Nano-scale study of the nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate coating on titanium implants, Biomater., 25 (2004) 2901-2910.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.063

Google Scholar

[12] M. Haïdopoulos, S. Turgeon, C. Sarra-Bournet, G. Laroche, D. Mantovani, Development of an optimized electrochemical process for subsequent coating of 316 stainless steel for stent applications, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 17 (2006) 647-657.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-9228-4

Google Scholar

[13] T. Kokubo, H. Takadama, How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?, Biomater, 27 (2006) 2907-2915.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017

Google Scholar

[14] J. Amer Nordin, D. H. Prajitno, S. Saidin, H. Nur, H. Hermawan, Structure–property relationships of iron–hydroxyapatite ceramic matrix nanocomposite fabricated using mechanosynthesis method, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 51 (2015) 294-299.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.019

Google Scholar