Simple Numerical Homogenization Model for FRCM Reinforced Masonry Panels Subjected to Out-of-Plane Loads

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper deals with the analysis of FRCM reinforced masonry panels in simple bending by means of a two-step homogenization approach. In the first step, homogenization is performed on unreinforced masonry through a straightforward procedure already validated for in-plane loaded FRCM reinforced panels, where the elementary cell is discretized by means of 24 CST elastic elements (bricks) and joints are reduced to interfaces with holonomic softening behavior. Out-of-plane homogenized quantities (moment-curvature relationships) are then obtained by simple on-thickness integration. At a structural level (step two), masonry is modeled with rigid elements and homogenized torsional and bending springs, whereas FRCM by two noded trusses with equivalent mechanical properties evaluated on the base of experimental data available. The implementation is handled within the commercial FE software Abaqus. As a matter of fact, the Concrete Damage Plasticity Model (CDP) already implemented into the code allows taking into account the progressive change of stiffness of brittle supports when subjected to alternate cracking-crushing mechanisms, as well as to properly deal with the cyclic behavior. The validation of the procedure is conducted against a series of full scale masonry walls tested by Nanni and co-workers at the University of Miami. A tri-dimensional heterogeneous micro-modeling technique is also used for both unreinforced and FRCM strengthened panels to further validate the homogenization model proposed. The discretization adopted is adjusted in order to allow the presence of two eight-noded FEs along the mortar joint thickness. FRCM is modeled by means of truss elements whose mechanical properties are calibrated to reproduce the behavior of the textile net embedded into the cementitious matrix. The elastic and inelastic mechanical parameters of all the materials involved into the numerical analyses have been calibrated in agreement with laboratory tests, when available. Pros and cons of the two numerical strategies are discussed mostly with respect to the accuracy of the outcomes in terms of global behavior of the panels and damage mechanisms, as well as with respect to the computational effort required by the two approaches to complete the analyses.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

234-241

Citation:

Online since:

July 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T.C. Triantafillou, M.N. Fardis, Strengthening of historic masonry structures with composite materials, Materials and Structures/Matériaux et Constructions 30 (1997) 486-496.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02524777

Google Scholar

[2] T.C. Triantafillou, A new generation of composite materials as alternative to fiber reinforced polymers for strengthening and seismic retrofitting of structures, In Proc.: Composite materials. A vision for the future (Eds.: Nicolais L, Meo M, Milella E). Springer-Verlag London Limited (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-166-0_5

Google Scholar

[3] S. Babaeidarabad, F. De Caso; A. Nanni, Out-of-Plane Behavior of URM Walls Strengthened with Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix Composite, J. Compos. Constr. 18-4 (2014).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000457

Google Scholar

[4] S. Babaeidarabad, G. Loreto, D. Arboleda, A. Nanni, FRCM-Strengthened CMU masonry walls subjected to out-of-plane load, The Masonry Society Journal, 32-1 (2014).

Google Scholar

[5] E. Bertolesi, G. Milani, P.B. Lourenço, Implementation and validation of a total displacement non-linear homogenization approach for in-plane loaded masonry, Computers & Structures, 176 (2016) 13–33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.08.001

Google Scholar

[6] E. Bertolesi, G. Milani, C. Poggi, Simple holonomic homogenization model for the non-linear static analysis of in-plane loaded masonry walls strengthened with FRCM composites, Composites Structures, 158 (2016) 291-307.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.027

Google Scholar

[7] ABAQUSTM. Finite Element Analysis, v6. 6. Theory Manual. SIMULIA, Inc.: Maastricht, (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] E. Bertolesi, F.G. Carozzi, G. Milani, C. Poggi, Numerical modeling of Fabric Reinforced Cementitious Matrix composites (FRCM) in tension, Construction and Building Materials, 70 (2014) 531-548.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.006

Google Scholar