The Use of Mersilene Tape in Transabdominal Cerclage

Abstract:

Aim: The purpose of this article is to show the use and utility of mersilene tape in medical procedures, such as transabdominal cerclage (TAC). Material and methods: Based on their biomechanical properties, we present our experience with mersilene tape used as treatment for cervical incompetence. Cervical insufficiency or cervical incompetence is defined as asymptomatic cervical shortening and dilatation with the absence of detectable uterine contractions. The mechanical properties of cervical tissue are derived from its extracellular matrix and its most important constituent the fibrillar collagen, alongside other constituents such as proteoglycans, hyaluronic acid, elastin, and water. In the absence of the uterine contractions, the cervix is loaded by intrauterine pressure (including the weight of the growing fetus and amniotic sac), the gravity as well as passive pressure from the uterine wall. These forces also depend on the support action of pelvic floor structures and abdominal wall. The static load resulting from the combination of uterine growth, hydrostatic pressure and gravity seems to be the dominant determinants that cause cervical shortening. The placement of the mersilene tape acts as a barrier between the intrauterine pressure and the cervix. The main advantage of the TAC procedure is the placement of the nonabsorbable suture (mersilene tape at the level of the internal os, avoiding the placement of a vaginal foreign body and subsequently increasing the risk of ascending lower genital tract infection, decreased incidence of slippage, and the ability to leave the stitch in place between pregnancies. Results: The follow-up was without complications regarding the pregnancies treated with transabdominal cerclage. None of the pregnancies terminated prematurely as related to the presence of the tape, but it necessitates to be performed a caesarean section for delivery. Conclusions: Mersilene tape is safe and useful in different medical procedures, including transabdominal cerclage during pregnancy.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 752)
• Pages: 64-70
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.752.64
• Online since: August 2017
• Authors: Claudia Mehedințu, Ana Maria Rotaru, Marina Antonovici*, Mihaela Plotogea, Elvira Brătilă, Roxana Bohîlțea, Costin Berceanu, Oana Ionescu
• Keywords: Cerclage, Cervical Incompetence, Mersilene Tape

References

[1] Y. Chen, H. Liu, J. Gu, S. Yao, Therapeutic effect and safety of laparoscopic cervical cerclage for treatment of cervical insufficiency in first trimester or non-pregnant phase, Int J Clin Exp Med 8(5) (2015) 7710-7718.

[2] K. Kosinska-Kaczynska, D. Bomba-Opon, A. Zygula, B. Kaczynski, P. Wegrzyn, M. Wielgos, Adjunctive pessary therapy after emergency cervical cerclage for cervical insufficiency with protruding fetal membranes in the second trimester of pregnancy: a novel modification of treatment, Biomed Res Int. (2015).

DOI: 10.1155/2015/185371

[3] D. Gallot, D. Savary, H. Laurichesse, J.A. Bournazeau, J. Amblard, D. Lemery, Experience with three cases of laparoscopic transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage and two subsequent pregnancies, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 110 (2003).

DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02272.x

[4] F.K. Lotgering, Clinical aspects of cervical insufficiency, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 7(Suppl 1) (2007) : S17.

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-s1-s17

[5] M.U. Witt, SD Joy, J Clark, A Herring, W Bowes, JM Thorp, Cervicoisthmic Cerclage: Transabdominal Versus Transvaginal Approach, Am J Obstet Gynecol. 201(1) (2009) 105. e1–105. e4.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.020

[6] J.E. Shin, MJ Kim, GW Kim, DW Lee, MK Lee, SJ Kim, Laparoscopic transabdominal cervical cerclage: Case report of a woman without exocervix at 11 weeks gestation, Obstet Gynecol Sci. 57(3) (2014) 232-235.

DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.3.232

[7] J.E. Song, KY Lee, GH Son, Prediction of outcome for transabdominal cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency, Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International 2015 (2015), 5 pages.

DOI: 10.1155/2015/985764

[8] R. Martins Ribeiro Itaborahy, A Verlangieri Carmo, S Freitas de Medeiros, A Yassin, Endovaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length in healthy pregnant women between 20 and 34 gestational weeks, Radiol Bras. 43(6) (2010) 379–383.

DOI: 10.1590/s0100-39842010000600009

[9] J.P. Nott, EA Bonney, JD Pickering, NAB Simpson, The structure and function of the cervix during pregnancy, Translational Research in Anatomy. 2 (2016) 1-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tria.2016.02.001

[10] K.M. Myers, H Feltovich, E Mazza, J Vink, M Bajka, RJ Wapner, TJ Hall, M House, The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy, J Biomech. 48(9) (2015) 1511-23.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.065

[11] M. House, DL Kaplan, S Socrate, Relationships between mechanical properties and extracellular matrix constituents of the cervical stroma during pregnancy, Semin Perinatol. 33(5) (2009) 300–307.

DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.06.002

[12] R. Souza Brandão, C Rodrigues Pires, E de Souza, F da Silva Maciel Junior, A Fernandes Moron, R Mattar, Biometric analysis of uterine cervix during pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, Radiol Bras. 41(4) (2008).

DOI: 10.1590/s0100-39842008000400007

[13] A. Göçmen, F. Sanlikan, Two live births following robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage in nonpregnant women, Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013 (2013), 3 pages.

DOI: 10.1155/2013/256972

[14] O.A. Tusheva, S.L. Cohen, T.F. McElrath, J.I. Einarsson, Laparoscopic placement of cervical cerclage, Rev Obstet Gynecol. 5(3/4) (2012) e158-e165.

[15] SOGC Clinical practice guidelines, Cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage, 301 (2013).

[16] J.E. Sumners, SG Kuper, TL Foster, Transabdominal Cerclage, Clinical Obstetrics And Gynecology. 59(2) (2016) 295–301.

DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000183

[17] I. Kyvernitakis, F. Lotgering, B. Arabin, Abdominal cerclage in twin pregnancy after radical surgical conization, Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014 (2014), 4 pages.

DOI: 10.1155/2014/519826

[18] F.K. Lotgering, I.P. Gaugler-Senden, S.F. Lotgering, H.C. Wallenburg, Outcome after transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage, Obstet Gynecol. 107(4) (2006) 779-84.

DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000206817.97328.cd

[19] I. Antoniac, E. Bratila, O. Munteanu, M. Cirstoiu, Design and materials influence on clinical functionality of the cerclage pessary use in prevention of premature birth, Materiale Plastice, 53(4) (2016 612-616.

[20] M. Cirstoiu, O. Munteanu, I. Antoniac, C. Cirstoiu, Comparison of pain level during and after intrauterine device insertion: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus the copper T intrauterine device, EEMJ, 15(5) (2016) 965-972.

DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2016.105

[21] M. Cirstoiu, I. Antoniac, L. Ples, E. Bratila, O. Munteanu, Adverse reactions due to use of two intrauterine devices with different action mechanism in a rare clinical case, Materiale Plastice, 53(4) (2016) 666-669.

[22] M. Cirstoiu, C. Cirstoiu, I. Antoniac, O. Munteanu, Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine Systems: Device Design, Biomaterials, Mechanism of Action and Surgical Technique, Materiale Plastice, 52(2) (2015) 258-262.

DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2016.105

[23] F. Miculescu, D. Bojin, L.T. Ciocan, I. Antoniac, M. Miculescu, N. Miculescu, Experimental researches on biomaterial-tissue interface interactions, JOAM, 9(11) (2007) 3303–3306.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.638.14

[24] M. Mahran, Transabdominal cervical cerclage during pregnancy. A modified technique, Obstet Gynecol. 52 (1978) 502-506.

[25] J.F. Carter, DE Soper, Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage, JSLS. 9 (2005) 491–493.

[26] M.B. Reedy, B. Kallen, T.J. Kuehl, Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a study of five fetal outcome parameters with use of the Swedish Health Registry, Am J Obstet Gynecol. 177 (1997) 673– 679.

DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70163-7

[27] O.E. Ayegbusi, Laparasocopic cerclage in pregnant and nonpregnant uterus: emerging need to change conventional management approach, World J Lap Surg. 10(1) (2017) 35-39.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1299

[28] C.J. Winters, M.P. Fitzgerald, M.D. Barber, The use of synthetic mesh in female pelvic reconstructive surgery, BJU International. 98(1) (2006) 70–76.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06309.x

[29] M. Colaco, J. Mettu, G. Badlani, The scientific basis for the use of biomaterials in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), BJU Int. 115 (2015) 859–866.

DOI: 10.1111/bju.12819

[30] H.K. Sidhu, B. McElhinney, J.C. Dornan, Transabdominal Cervicoisthmic Cerclage: Initial Experience, The Ulster Medical Journal. 66(2) (1997) 107-110.

[31] D. Bolla, L. Raio, S. Imboden, M.D. Mueller, Laparoscopic Cerclage as a Treatment Option for Cervical InsufficiencyLaparoscopic cerclage as a treatment option for cervical insufficiency, Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 75(8) (2015) 833–838.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1557762

[32] W.L. Whittle, S.S. Singh, L. Allen, L. Glaude, J. Thomas, R. Windrim, N. Leyland, Laparoscopic cervico-isthmic cerclage: surgical technique and obstetric outcomes, Am J Obstet Gynecol. 201 (2009) 364. e1-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.018