Properties Analysis of Biological Grafts Used in Pelvic Surgery

Article Preview

Abstract:

Pelvic surgery addresses congenital malformations like Mullerian anomalies, pelvic organ prolapse or after radical intervention, while constructive surgery involves treatment of congenital/iatrogenic absence of organs: uterus or vagina. Intuitively, inert and nondegradable biomaterials appear ideal for this purpose, but surgical reality is that the persistence of a permanent foreign body in the wound has a lot of clinical postoperative disadvantages. This paper aims to discuss the properties of the biologic grafts, detailing the structure of biologic extracellular matrix, the biomechanical properties of biological grafts and the use of extracellular matrix in reconstructive pelvic surgery. A biologic graft used in pelvic surgery is a tridimensional extracellular matrix, acellular and of animal origin. It has as a low risk of transmission of viral and prionic infections and determines reduced inflammatory reaction and a low risk of rejection. The absence of crosslinking facilitates the colonization of the mesh by the host´s cells, thus avoids the foreign body reaction represented by the encapsulation of the mesh by the host. Our experience with clinical use of biological acellular grafts in reconstructive pelvic surgery includes oncoplastic surgery like in cases of vulvar cancer or neovagina reconstruction for Rokintansky syndrome, complications after prolapse surgery treated with polypropylene meshes or relapsing recto-vaginal fistulas. The biomechanical properties evaluated by tensile stress and elastic modulus revealed that biologic grafts with moderate collagen infiltration are the strongest. The degree of cross-linkage influences the rate of degradation and the degree of the inflammatory response triggered by the host organ. Cross-linked collagenous matrices induce little cell infiltration hence there is limited collagen remodeling and graft degradation. On the other hand, in non-cross- linked xenografts cell infiltration is greater with faster degradation rate and collagen production. The decrease in the mechanical strength of the graft materials is related to the lack of collagen infiltration into the material. In conclusion, taking into account the biomechanical properties of biologic grafts, these may be used in reconstructive pelvic surgery and oncoplastic surgery with little complications and good clinical results. They can be attached to large mucosal defects and on potentially septic tissue, they are mechanically resistant and they can be sutured on surrounding healthy tissue.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

71-77

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] I. Antoniac, Biologically responsive biomaterials for tissue engineering, Springer, New York, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] I. Antoniac, Handbook of Bioceramics and Biocomposites, Springer, New York, (2016).

Google Scholar

[3] E. Bratila, C. P. Bratila, R. Stanculescu, M. M. Cirstoiu, D. E. Comandasu, C. Berceanu, O. Munteanu, Recurrent obstric rectovaginal fistula treated by Surgisis graft – Case Report, 49th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Society for Clinical Investigation, Proceedings of ESCI, ISBN 978-88-7587-719-4, pp.59-62.

Google Scholar

[4] J.V. Rau, I. Antoniac, G. Cama, V.S. Komlev, A. Ravaglioli, Bioactive Materials for Bone Tissue Engineering, Biomed Research International, 3741428 (2016).

DOI: 10.1155/2016/3741428

Google Scholar

[5] I. Antoniac, C. Sinescu, A. Antoniac, Adhesion aspects in biomaterials and medical devices, JAST, 30(16) (2016) 1711-1715.

Google Scholar

[6] I. Titorencu, M.G. Albu, M. Giurginca, V. Jinga, I. Antoniac, V. Trandafir, C. Cotrut, F. Miculescu, M. Simionescu, In vitro biocompatibility of human endothelial cells with collagen-doxycycline matrices, Molecular Crystals And Liquid Crystals, Vol. 523, (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/15421401003724126

Google Scholar

[7] I. Antoniac, Biodegradability of some collagen sponges reinforced with different bioceramics, Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 587, (2014) 179-184.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.587.179

Google Scholar

[8] F. Miculescu, D. Bojin, L.T. Ciocan, I. Antoniac, M. Miculescu, N. Miculescu, Experimental researches on biomaterial-tissue interface interactions, JOAM, 9(11) (2007) 3303 – 3306.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.638.14

Google Scholar

[9] J.E. Jelovsek, Pelvic organ prolapse in women: Choosing a primary surgical procedure, www. uptodate. com, (2015).

Google Scholar

[10] M. Cirstoiu, I. Antoniac, L. Ples, E. Bratila, O. Munteanu, Adverse reactions due to use of two intrauterine devices with different action mechanism in a rare clinical case, Materiale Plastice, 53(4) (2016) 666-669.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Petreus, B.A. Stoica, A. Petreus Goriuc, C.E. Cotrut, I.V. Antoniac, L. Barbu-Tudoran, Preparation and cytocompatibility evaluation for hydrosoluble phosphorous acid-derivatized cellulose as tissue engineering scaffold material, JMSMM, 25(4) (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5146-z

Google Scholar

[12] I. Antoniac, E. Bratila, O. Munteanu, M. Cirstoiu, Design and materials influence on clinical functionality of the cerclage pessary use in prevention of premature birth, Materiale Plastice, 53(4) (2016 612-616.

Google Scholar

[13] E. Bratila, C. P. Bratila, D.E. Comandasu,V. Bausic, D. Pop, C. Vlad, M. Cirstoiu, R. Stanculescu, Perineal reconstruction with biologic graft vulvoplasy for verrucous carcinoma treated with multiple vulvar excisions: Case ReportRom, J. Mophol, 56: 2 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.02.212

Google Scholar

[14] E. Bratila, C.P. Bratila, C.B. Coroleuca, M.M. Cirstoiu, C. Berceanu, The impact of biomaterials in the reconstructive gynecologic surgery, Gineco. eu 11: 42 (2015) 172-175.

Google Scholar

[15] R.G. Rogers, T.B. Fashokun, Pelvic organ prolapse in women: An overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and management, www. uptodate. com, (2016).

Google Scholar

[16] L. M. Pierce, at all, Biomechanical properties of synthetic and biologic graft materials following long term implantation in the rabbit abdomen and vagina, AJOG, vol. 200: 5 (2009) 549.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.041

Google Scholar

[17] M. L. Konstantinovic, at all, Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal derived collagen implants in a rat model, BJOG, 112: 11, (2005) 1554–1560.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00688.x

Google Scholar

[18] C.I. Mavrodin, G. Pariza, D. Ion, I. Antoniac, Abdominal Compartment Syndrome – A major complication of large incisional hernia surgery, Chirurgia, 108(3) (2013) 414-417.

Google Scholar

[19] G. Pariza, C. Mavrodin, I. Antoniac, Dependency between the porosity and polymeric structure of biomaterials used in hernia surgery and chronic mesh-infection, Materiale Plastice, 52(4) (2015) 484-486.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1114.278

Google Scholar

[20] E. Bratila, C.P. Bratila, D.E. Comandasu, Recurrent rectovaginal fistula treated by acellular interposition graft. A case report, Paripex – Indian Journal of Research 4: 3 (2015) 28-30.

Google Scholar