Evaluation of Ammonia-Nitrogen Removal by Ultrasonic Irradiation in Synthetic Solution Using Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of ultrasonic irradiation to remove ammonia-nitrogen in synthetic solution by considering the factors including initial concentration, pH and irradiation time. Ultrasonic bath was used to provide a constant effective power, frequency and temperature of 150 W, 37 kHz and 60°C, respectively during sonication. It was revealed that the removal efficiency of ammonia-nitrogen improved at lower concentration with basic water environment and extended irradiation time. Based on this judgement, optimization is carried out by using response surface methodology (RSM) of Box Behnken design to develop a quadratic regression model in order to analyze the interactions between the three factors and their effects on the removal efficiency. Optimum removal achieved from the model was found to be 82.26% at 10 mg/L of initial concentration with pH of 11 and sonication for 30 minutes. Verification of the quadratic regression model is done by comparing with the experimental work conducted within the experimental domain.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

108-117

Citation:

Online since:

March 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mook, W. T., M. H. Chakrabarti, M. K. Aroua, G. M. A. Khan, B. S. Ali, M. S. Islam, and MA Abu Hassan. Removal of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrate and total organic carbon (TOC) from aquaculture wastewater using electrochemical technology: A review. Desalination 285 (2012) 1-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.029

Google Scholar

[2] Dong, Sainan, and Majid Sartaj. Statistical analysis and optimization of ammonia removal from landfill leachate by sequential microwave/aeration process using factorial design and response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4, no. 1 (2016) 100-108.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2015.10.029

Google Scholar

[3] Luo, Xianping, Qun Yan, Chunying Wang, Caigui Luo, Nana Zhou, and Chensheng Jian. Treatment of ammonia nitrogen wastewater in low concentration by two-stage ozonization. International journal of environmental research and public health 12, no. 9 (2015) 11975-11987.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120911975

Google Scholar

[4] Halim, Azhar Abdul, Mohd Talib Latif, and Anuar Ithnin. Ammonia removal from aqueous solution using organic acid modified activated carbon. World Applied Sciences Journal 24, no. 1 (2013) 01-06.

Google Scholar

[5] Park, Jongmin, Hai-Feng Jin, Byung-Ran Lim, Ki-Young Park, and Kisay Lee. Ammonia removal from anaerobic digestion effluent of livestock waste using green alga Scenedesmus sp. Bioresource technology 101, no. 22 (2010) 8649-8657.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.142

Google Scholar

[6] Khai, Nguyen Manh, and T. Q. T. Hoang. Chemical Precipitation of Ammonia and Phosphate from Nam Son Landfill Leachate, Hanoi. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment 3 (2012) 32-36.

DOI: 10.5829/idosi.ijee.2012.03.05.06

Google Scholar

[7] Rahmani, A. R., A. H. Mahvi, A. R. Mesdaghinia, and S. Nasseri. Investigation of ammonia removal from polluted waters by Clinoptilolite zeolite. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology 1, no. 2 (2004) 125-133.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03325825

Google Scholar

[8] Lahav, Ori, Yuval Schwartz, Paz Nativ, and Youri Gendel. Sustainable removal of ammonia from anaerobic-lagoon swine waste effluents using an electrochemically-regenerated ion exchange process. Chemical engineering journal 218 (2013) 214-222.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.043

Google Scholar

[9] Fan, Lu, Shixiang Wang, Yanlan Liu, Wenjing Yang, Xianyu Hou, Ying Su, Yi Zhao, Xuan Zhou, Qian Chen, and Yong Liu. Selective Reduction of NO 3--N from Wastewater to N 2 by Zn/Ag Bimetallic Particles Combined with Wet Ammonia Oxidation Process. Separation and Purification Technology (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.025

Google Scholar

[10] Jeong, Guk, Jae-Hoon Jung, Jun-Heok Lim, Yong Sun Won, and Jea-Keun Lee. A Computational Mechanistic Study of Breakpoint Chlorination for the Removal of Ammonia Nitrogen from Water. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan 47, no. 3 (2014) 225-229.

DOI: 10.1252/jcej.13we243

Google Scholar

[11] Lin, Li, Songhu Yuan, Jing Chen, Zuqun Xu, and Xiaohua Lu. Removal of ammonia nitrogen in wastewater by microwave radiation. Journal of hazardous materials 161, no. 2 (2009) 1063-1068.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.053

Google Scholar

[12] Jiang X., Cheng Z., Ma W., Gao Z., Ma X. and Wang R. Removal of Ammonia from Wastewater by Natural Freezing Method. International Conference on Chemical, Material and Food Engineering. (2015) 174 – 177.

DOI: 10.2991/cmfe-15.2015.41

Google Scholar

[13] Matouq, Mohammed Abu-Dayeh, and Zaid A. Al-Anber. The application of high frequency ultrasound waves to remove ammonia from simulated industrial wastewater. Ultrasonics sonochemistry 14, no. 3 (2007) 393-397.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.09.003

Google Scholar

[14] Doosti, M. R., R. Kargar, and M. H. Sayadi. Water treatment using ultrasonic assistance: A review. Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 2, no. 2 (2012) 96.

Google Scholar

[15] Ning, Ping, Hans-Jörg Bart, Yijiao Jiang, A. De Haan, and C. Tien. Treatment of organic pollutants in coke plant wastewater by the method of ultrasonic irradiation, catalytic oxidation and activated sludge. Separation and Purification Technology 41, no. 2 (2005) 133-139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2004.02.004

Google Scholar

[16] Shirsath, S. R., S. H. Sonawane, and P. R. Gogate. Intensification of extraction of natural products using ultrasonic irradiations—a review of current status. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 53 (2012) 10-23.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2012.01.003

Google Scholar

[17] Belgiorno, Vincenzo, Luigi Rizzo, Despo Fatta, Claudio Della Rocca, Giusy Lofrano, Anastasia Nikolaou, Vincenzo Naddeo, and Sureyya Meric. Review on endocrine disrupting-emerging compounds in urban wastewater: occurrence and removal by photocatalysis and ultrasonic irradiation for wastewater reuse. Desalination 215, no. 1-3 (2007) 166-176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.10.035

Google Scholar

[18] Matouq, Mohammed Abu-Dayeh, and Zaid A. Al-Anber. The application of high frequency ultrasound waves to remove ammonia from simulated industrial wastewater. Ultrasonics sonochemistry 14, no. 3 (2007) 393-397.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.09.003

Google Scholar

[19] Rahimi, Masoud, Sahar Safari, Mahboubeh Faryadi, and Negin Moradi. Experimental investigation on proper use of dual high-low frequency ultrasound waves—Advantage and disadvantage. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 78 (2014) 17-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2014.02.003

Google Scholar

[20] Xu, Jinqiu, Jinping Jia, and Jingwei Wang. Ultrasonic Decomposition of Ammonia‐Nitrogen and Organic Compounds in Coke Plant Wastewater. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 52, no. 1 (2005) 59-65.

DOI: 10.1002/jccs.200500009

Google Scholar

[21] Ozturk, Emrah, and Nazire Bal. Evaluation of ammonia–nitrogen removal efficiency from aqueous solutions by ultrasonic irradiation in short sonication periods. Ultrasonics sonochemistry 26 (2015) 422-427.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.02.012

Google Scholar

[22] Xu, Jinqiu, Jinping Jia, and Jingwei Wang. Ultrasonic Decomposition of Ammonia‐Nitrogen and Organic Compounds in Coke Plant Wastewater. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 52, no. 1 (2005) 59-65.

DOI: 10.1002/jccs.200500009

Google Scholar

[23] Wang, Xikui, Zhongyan Yao, Jingang Wang, Weilin Guo, and Guoliang Li. Degradation of reactive brilliant red in aqueous solution by ultrasonic cavitation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 15, no. 1 (2008) 43-48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.01.008

Google Scholar

[24] Ozturk, Emrah, and Nazire Bal. Evaluation of ammonia–nitrogen removal efficiency from aqueous solutions by ultrasonic irradiation in short sonication periods. Ultrasonics sonochemistry 26 (2015) 422-427.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.02.012

Google Scholar

[25] Chen, Wei, Wei-Ping Wang, Hua-Shan Zhang, and Qin Huang. Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of water-soluble polysaccharides from Boletus edulis mycelia using response surface methodology. Carbohydrate Polymers 87, no. 1 (2012) 614-619.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.029

Google Scholar

[26] Kumar, Arvind, B. Prasad, and I. M. Mishra. Optimization of process parameters for acrylonitrile removal by a low-cost adsorbent using Box–Behnken design. Journal of Hazardous Materials 150, no. 1 (2008) 174-182.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.043

Google Scholar

[27] Khajeh, Mostafa, and Fatemeh Musavi Zadeh. Response surface modeling of ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for determination of benzene, toluene and xylenes in water samples: Box–Behnken design. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology 89, no. 1 (2012) 38-43.

DOI: 10.1007/s00128-012-0657-0

Google Scholar

[28] Jain, Monika, V. K. Garg, and K. Kadirvelu. Investigation of Cr (VI) adsorption onto chemically treated Helianthus annuus: optimization using response surface methodology, Bioresource technology 102, no. 2 (2011) 600-605.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.001

Google Scholar

[29] Yuan X., Liu J., Zeng G., Shi J., Tong J. and Huang G. Optimization of conversion of waste rapeseed oil with high FFA to biodiesel using response surface methodology. Renewable Energy, 33, (2008) 1678 – 1684.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.09.007

Google Scholar