Mechanical Strength and Porosity of Carbonate Apatite-Chitosan-Gelatine Scaffold in Various Ratio as a Biomaterial Candidate in Tissue Engineering

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bone defect is a common problem in the field of dentistry. The defect can be solved bytissue engineering. One component of tissue engineering is scaffold. Carbonate apatite is the main material used because it has an organic components similar to human bones. The carbonate apatite combined with gelatin and chitosan can be used as a scaffold for tissue engineering. The aim of thisstudy is to know the exact ratio of the carbonate apatite, chitosan-gelatine (CA:Ch-GEL) scaffold on the compressive strength and porosity size as biomaterial candidates in tissue engineering. Scaffold was synthesized from CA:Ch-GEL with different ratios of 50:50, 60:40, 70:30 and 80:20 withfreeze drying method. Fourier Transform Infared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was used CA:Ch-GEL scaffold functional group identification. Scaffold mechanical test was performed using an Autograph while a porosity test was performed using Scanning Electron Microscope. All data wereanalyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test. Scaffold has a compressive strength ranges 4.02 - 11.35 MPa, with porous ranges 19,18 mm – 52,59 mm at 50:50, 60:40, 70:30 and 80:20 ratios. CA:Ch-GEL scaffold at all ratios can be used as biomaterials in tissue engineering

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

173-181

Citation:

Online since:

December 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Nanofibers and Nanoparticles for Orthopaedic Surgery Applications. J Bone Jt Surgery-American 90 (2008) 128–31.

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.g.01520

Google Scholar

[2] Murphy CM, O'Brien FJ, Little DG, Schindeler A. Cell-scaffold interactions in the bone tissue engineering triad. Eur Cell Mater 26 (2013) 120–32.

Google Scholar

[3] Yuliati A, Kartikasari N, Munadziroh E, Rianti D. The profile of crosslinked bovine hydroxyapatite gelatin chitosan scaffolds with 0.25% glutaraldehyde. J Int Dent Med Res. 10 (2017) 151–5.

Google Scholar

[4] O'Brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14 (2011) 88–95.

Google Scholar

[5] Tripathi G, Basu B. A porous hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering: Physico mechanical and biological evaluations. Ceram Int. 38 (2012) 341–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.07.012

Google Scholar

[6] Park J-Y, Yang C, Jung I-H, Lim H-C, Lee J-S, Jung U-W, et al. Regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects using cells-implanted nano-hydroxyapatite coated silk scaffolds. Biomater Res 19 (2015) 1–10.

DOI: 10.1186/s40824-015-0027-1

Google Scholar

[7] Salim S, Ariani MD. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of carbonate apatite-collagen scaffolds with some cytokines for bone tissue engineering. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 15 (2015) 349–55.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.171821

Google Scholar

[8] Dewi AH, Triawan A. The Newly Bone Formation with Carbonate Apatite-Chitosan Bone Substitute in the Rat Tibia. Indones J Dent Res. 1 (2011) 54–60.

DOI: 10.22146/theindjdentres.10065

Google Scholar

[9] Maji K, Dasgupta S, Kundu B, Bissoyi A. Development of gelatin-chitosan-hydroxyapatite based bioactive bone scaffold with controlled pore size and mechanical strength. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 26 (2015) 1190–209.

DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2015.1082809

Google Scholar

[10] Kim M, Evans D. Tissue Engineering : The Future of Stem Cells. In: Ashammaki N, Reis R, editors. Top. Tissue Eng. 2 (2005) 1–22.

Google Scholar

[11] Gleeson JP, Plunkett NA, O'Brien FJ. Addition of hydroxyapatite improves stiffness, interconnectivity and osteogenic potential of a highly porous collagen-based scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. Eur Cell Mater20 (2010) 18–30.

DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v020a18

Google Scholar

[12] Chen G, Li W, Zhao B, Sun K. A Novel Biphasic Bone Scaffold: β-Calcium Phosphate and Amorphous Calcium Polyphosphate. J Am Ceram Soc. 92 (2009) 945–8.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.02971.x

Google Scholar

[13] Pace A, Valenza A, Vitale A. Mechanical characterization of human cancellous bone tissue by static compression test. In: Alessandro R, Brucato V, Rimondini L, Spadaro G, editors. I Mater. Biocompat. Per La Med. First, Mantova, Italy: Universitas StudiorumS.r.l., 2014, p.15–8.

Google Scholar

[14] Thein-Han WW, Saikhun J, Pholpramoo C, Misra RDK, Kitiyanant Y. Chitosan–gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering: Physico-chemical properties and biological response of buffalo embryonic stem cells and transfectant of GFP–buffalo embryonic stem cells. Acta Biomater. 5 (2009) 3453–66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.012

Google Scholar

[15] Isikli C, Hasirci V, Hasirci N. Development of porous chitosan-gelatin/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for hard tissue-engineering applications. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 6 (2012) 135–43.

DOI: 10.1002/term.406

Google Scholar

[16] Ariani MD, Matsuura A, Hirata I, Kubo T, Kato K, Akagawa Y. New development of carbonate apatite-chitosan scaffold based on lyophilization technique for bone tissue engineering. Dent Mater J. 3 (2013):317–25.

DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2012-257

Google Scholar

[17] Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 30 (2012) 546–54.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005

Google Scholar

[18] Matsuura A, Kubo T, Doi K, Hayashi K, Morita K, Yokota R, et al. Bone formation ability of carbonate apatite-collagen scaffolds with different carbonate contents. Dent Mater J. 28 (2009) 234–42.

DOI: 10.4012/dmj.28.234

Google Scholar

[19] Bakunova NV, Komlev VS, Fedotov Ay, Fadeeva IV, Smirov VV, Shvorneva LI, Gurin AN Barinov SM. A method of fabrication of porous carbonated hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Powder Mettalurgy Progress Journal 8 (2008) 336–42.

Google Scholar

[20] Hannink G, Arts JJC. Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: What is optimal for bone regeneration? Injury 42 (2011): S22–5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008

Google Scholar

[21] Aprilisna M, Ramadhany CA, Sunendar B, Widodo HB. Karakteristik dan Aktivitas Antibakteri Scaffold Membran Cangkang Telur yang Diaktivasi Karbonat Apatit. Maj Kedokt Gigi Indones. 1 (2015) 59.

DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.8993

Google Scholar

[22] Ge J, Guo L, Wang S, Zhang Y, Cai T, Zhao RCH, et al. The Size of Mesenchymal Stem Cells is a Significant Cause of Vascular Obstructions and Stroke. Stem Cell Rev Reports 10 (2014) 295–303.

DOI: 10.1007/s12015-013-9492-x

Google Scholar

[23] Woodard JR, Hilldore AJ, Lan SK, Park CJ, Morgan AW, Eurell JAC, et al. The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity. Biomaterials 28 (2007) 45–54.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.021

Google Scholar