Performance Evaluation of a Novel Hydrophobic Membrane Used in a Desalination System: A Comparison between Static and Moving Configurations

Article Preview

Abstract:

Water scarcity is growing and in particularly in regions where population is high. It is estimated by world wild life organization that two thirds of human population may face water shortage by 2025. However, the amount of water available on earth covers approximately two thirds of the total surface area, but most of the water is seawater. Seawater cannot be used for any human use due to the high salinity levels. Desalination processes have been implemented on various scales whereby reverse osmosis is the most successful. However, such system is too complex and expensive. An alternative system utilizing humidification-dehumidification process for desalination is proposed in this paper. The process involves the use of a novel hydrophobic membrane allowing the humidification. Two configurations have been tested in a closed loop cycle, namely: static and moving membrane. The results from the experiments have shown that the efficiency of the moving membrane configuration is higher than the static by 46%. And based on 1 Litre brine feed, 50% of the volume has been successfully desalinated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

79-84

Citation:

Online since:

September 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bralower T, Bice D. Distribution of Water on The Earth's surface n.d.

Google Scholar

[2] National Geographic. Fresh water crisis n.d.

Google Scholar

[3] Shahzad MW, Burhan M, Ng KC. Pushing desalination recovery to the maximum limit: Membrane and thermal processes integration. Desalination; 416:54–64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.024

Google Scholar

[4] Xue M, Qiu H, Guo W. Exceptionally fast water desalination at complete salt rejection by pristine graphyne monolayers. Nanotechnology.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/50/505720

Google Scholar

[5] Gu H, Wang C, Gong S, Mei Y, Li H, Ma W. Investigation on contact angle measurement methods and wettability transition of porous surfaces. Surf Coatings Technol; 292:72–7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.03.014

Google Scholar

[6] He WF, Han D, Ji C. Investigation on humidification dehumidification desalination system coupled with heat pump. Desalination;436:152–60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2018.02.021

Google Scholar

[7] Perrotta ML, Saielli G, Casella G, Macedonio F, Giorno L, Drioli E, et al. An ultrathin suspended hydrophobic porous membrane for high-efficiency water desalination. Appl Mater Today (2017); 9:1–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.009

Google Scholar

[8] Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW. A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater;26:11–6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.005

Google Scholar

[9] Edalatpour M, Liu L, Jacobi AM, Eid KF, Sommers AD. Managing water on heat transfer surfaces: A critical review of techniques to modify surface wettability for applications with condensation or evaporation. Appl Energy;222:967–92.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.178

Google Scholar

[10] An S, Joshi BN, Lee JG, Lee MW, Kim Y Il, Kim M woo, et al. A comprehensive review on wettability, desalination, and purification using graphene-based materials at water interfaces. Catal Today;295:14–25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.027

Google Scholar

[11] Hu H, Lai Z, Ding G. Influence of surface wettability on heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of wet air in metal foam under dehumidifying conditions. Int J Therm Sci;135:331–43.

DOI: 10.1615/ihtc16.hte.023824

Google Scholar

[12] Lin Z, Liu Y, Wong CP. Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic octadecylamine-functionalized graphite oxide film. Langmuir.

DOI: 10.1021/la102619n

Google Scholar