Comparison between the Performance of Combined Treatment of Waste Water Physic-Chemical & Biological and the Direct Activated Sludge Applicated to Dairy Activity

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of operating conditions on the performance of two methods used for dairy wastewater treatment. First, a treatment that combined both physic-chemical and conventional activated sludge. Second, the conventional activated sludge alone. On one side, the study included the comparison of parameters of each system, and on the other side, it studied the economic impact on the dairy industry the subject of the study. The waste water treatment plant was modified in order to study the differences between the two options and to come up with the different possibilities. The comparison takes into consideration different parameters: temperature, pH, SS, COD. The dairy waste water was used with characterisation of COD: 4000mg/l, Suspended sludge: 425 mg/l, temperature: 27 °C, pH: 7.5. In this study we will see the different conditions to use one or another process. The studies come for many reasons, the most of them was the maintenance of the physic-chemical station. In order to let the system running the industrial decided to try the feeding the biological tank directly and see if it’s going to work. This is what will present this article in two parts; the first one showing the parameters and results of using the both process and the second one will show the parameters and results of using just the biological treatment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

31-39

Citation:

Online since:

August 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] El-Sonbati, M. A., El-Battrawy, O., Elawadly, E., & Hegazy, T. (2020). Pretreatment of high organic load dairy industry wastewater by chemical coagulation and advanced oxidation processes. Catrina: The International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21(1), 53-60.

DOI: 10.21608/cat.2020.94172

Google Scholar

[2] Yonar, T., Sivrioğlu, Ö., & Özengin, N. (2018). Physico-chemical treatment of dairy industry wastewaters: A review. Technological approaches for novel applications in dairy processing, 179.

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.77110

Google Scholar

[3] Nasr, M., Elreedy, A., Abdel-Kader, A., Elbarki, W., & Moustafa, M. (2014). Environmental consideration of dairy wastewater treatment using hybrid sequencing batch reactor. Sustainable Environment Research, 24(6), 449-456.

Google Scholar

[4] Montuelle, B., Goillard, J., & Le Hy, J. B. (1992). A combined anaerobic-aerobic process for the co-treatment of effluents from a piggery and a cheese factory. Journal of agricultural engineering research, 51, 91-100.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-8634(92)80028-q

Google Scholar

[5] Chen, G. Q., Talebi, S., Gras, S. L., Weeks, M., & Kentish, S. E. (2018). A review of salty waste stream management in the Australian dairy industry. Journal of environmental management, 224, 406-413.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.056

Google Scholar

[6] Tikariha, A., & Sahu, O. (2014). Study of characteristics and treatments of dairy industry waste water. Journal of applied & environmental microbiology, 2(1), 16-22.

Google Scholar

[7] Yusof, N. A., Abidin, N. Z., Zailani, S. H. M., Govindan, K., & Iranmanesh, M. (2016). Linking the environmental practice of construction firms and the environmental behaviour of practitioners in construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 64-71.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.090

Google Scholar

[8] Van, D. P., Fujiwara, T., Tho, B. L., Toan, P. P. S., & Minh, G. H. (2020). A review of anaerobic digestion systems for biodegradable waste: Configurations, operating parameters, and current trends. Environmental Engineering Research, 25(1), 1-17.

DOI: 10.4491/eer.2018.334

Google Scholar

[9] Al-Ahmady, K. K., & Ghanim, M. S. (2013). Performance Comparison of Activated Sludge Systems at Mesophilic and Thermophilic Modes in Treating Dairy Wastewater. Engineering and Technology Journal, 31(2 Part (A) Engineering).

Google Scholar

[10] Alturkmani, A. DAIRY INDUSTRY EFFLUENTS TREATMENT EFLUENTILOR DIN INDUSTRIA LAPTELUI.

Google Scholar

[11] Chemie, E. (2021, 2 juillet). Flottation. EnviroChemie.

Google Scholar

[12] Chemie,E.(2021b,juillet2).Procédésaérobies.EnviroChemie.

Google Scholar

[13] Khalaf, A. H., Ibrahim, W. A., Fayed, M., & Eloffy, M. G. (2021). Comparison between the performance of activated sludge and sequence batch reactor systems for dairy wastewater treatment under different operating conditions. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60(1), 1433-1445.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.10.062

Google Scholar

[14] Tosoni, J. (2015). Compréhension des facteurs de contrôle des performances de la déshydratation mécanique des boues résiduaires en filtre-presse (Doctoral dissertation, Clermont-Ferrand 2).

Google Scholar

[15] American Public Health Association. (1926). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (Vol. 6). American Public Health Association..

Google Scholar