The Influence of Sample Thickness on the Bending Fatigue Performance of PBF-Lb 316L Material

Timo Rautio; Eloïse Roux; Matias Jaskari; Aappo Mustakangas; Markku Keskitalo; Mikko Hietala; Antti Järvenpää

doi:10.4028/p-336eCO

Paper Titles

Analysing the Impact of Severe Shot Peening on the Fatigue Strength of Wire Arc Additively Manufactured Carbon Steel
p.15

Influence of Aging Condition on the Characteristics of Continuous Precipitates of AZ80 Magnesium Alloy
p.21

Influence of Hydrogen on the Failure Mechanism of Standard Duplex Stainless Steel X2CrNiMoN22-5-3 Exposed to Corrosion Fatigue
p.27

Investigating Different Heat Treatment Methods to Enhance the Mechanical Properties of 9254 Steel
p.33

The Influence of Sample Thickness on the Bending Fatigue Performance of PBF-Lb 316L Material
p.41

Microstructural Analysis and Microhardness Evaluation of Stainless Steel SS304 Joints Utilizing Microwave Hybrid Heating (MHH) and Cold/Heat Processing: A Fuzzy Logic Approach
p.51

Brazing of Copper Foam Using Cu-4.0Sn-9.9Ni-7.8P Filler Foil: Effect of Brazing Temperature and Copper Foam Pore Density
p.67

Brazing of Porous Nickel to Copper and Stainless Steel: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties
p.77

Stress Concentration Modelling on Resistance Spot Welding Lap Joint of Steel ASS316L and Titanium Ti-6Al-4V with Variable Weld Geometries
p.87

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 982The Influence of Sample Thickness on the Bending...

The Influence of Sample Thickness on the Bending Fatigue Performance of PBF-Lb 316L Material

Abstract:

Additive manufacturing, specifically Laser Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB), has gained prominence for its capability to produce complex near-net-shaped components. While PBF-LB offers advantages such as lightweight construction and cost-effectiveness, post-processing remains crucial to meet specific design requirements. This study investigates the post-processing technique of severe shot peening (SSP) on PBF-LB-manufactured 316L stainless steel, a material widely used for its favorable mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. The research focuses on the enhancement of bending fatigue properties through SSP treatment, examining the influence of material thickness on fatigue behavior. Comparative analysis reveals the effectiveness of SSP in significantly improving fatigue strength irrespective of variations in material thickness. Mechanical properties are explored for different thicknesses subjected to SSP treatment. Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) is employed to scrutinize the surface properties of the samples, providing knowledge on the microstructural changes induced by SSP. The study contributes to the understanding of the role of material thickness in the context of SSP treatment, offering a comprehensive exploration of the mechanical and fatigue characteristics of PBF-LB-manufactured 316L stainless steel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

The 7th International Conference on Materials Engineering and Applications & 9th International Conference on Building Materials and Construction

View Preview

Alloys, Steel, Metal Joining and Materials Processing

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 982)

Pages:

41-47

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-336eCO

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2024

Authors:

Timo Rautio*, Eloïse Roux, Matias Jaskari, Aappo Mustakangas, Markku Keskitalo, Mikko Hietala, Antti Järvenpää

Keywords:

316L, Bending Fatigue, Fatigue Strength, PBF-Lb

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Ishfaq, M. Asad, M.A. Mahmood, M. Abdullah, and C. Pruncu. Opportunities and challenges in additive manufacturing used in space sector: a comprehensive review. Rapid Prototyp. J., 28(10):2027–2042, 2022.

DOI: 10.1108/rpj-05-2022-0166

Google Scholar

[2] A. Malakizadi, D. Mallipeddi, S. Dadbakhsh, R. M'Saoubi, and P. Krajnik. Post-processing of additively manufactured metallic alloys – a review. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 179:103908, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2022.103908

Google Scholar

[3] C. Dordlofva, S. Brodin, and C. Andersson. Using demonstrator hardware to develop a future qualification logic for additive manufacturing parts. Proc. Int. Astronaut. Congr. IAC, 7:25, 2019.

Google Scholar

[4] B. Spierings, T.L. Starr, and K. Wegener. Fatigue performance of additive manufactured metallic parts. Rapid Prototyp. J., 19(2):88–94, 2013.

DOI: 10.1108/13552541311302932

Google Scholar

[5] T. Gundgire, T. Jokiaho, S. Santa-aho, T. Rautio, A. Järvenpää, and Vippola M. Comparative study of additively manufactured and reference 316 l stainless steel samples – effect of severe shot peening on microstructure and residual stresses. Mater. Charact., 191:112162, (2022)

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112162

Google Scholar

[6] T. Rautio, M. Jaskari, T. Gundgire, T. Iso-Junno, M. Vippola, and A. Järvenpää. The effect of severe shot peening on fatigue life of laser powder bed fusion manufactured 316l stainless steel. Mater., 15(10):3517, 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/ma15103517

Google Scholar

[7] H. Qu, J. Li, F. Zhang, and J. Bai. Anisotropic cellular structure and texture microstructure of 316l stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting via rotation scanning strategy. Mater. Des., page 110454, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110454

Google Scholar