A Method for Identifying Transverse and Thickness Compressive Modulus of Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites Based on DIC

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the short beam shear (SBS) test combined with digital image correlation (DIC) and finite element model updating (FEMU) method is conducted for identification the constitutive parameters of unidirectional composite laminates by minimizing the objective function which is established based on the variance of measured strain and numerical calculated strain. This method has the advantages of insensitive to initial value and high identification efficiency. By changing the test parameters, specimens with different principal planes were used in the SBS test and different failure modes achieved. The standard deviation of E22C and E33C was 8.47% and 3.58% respectively. The comparison of the identification results of the same batch of specimens, different principal planes, different failure modes and different ROI shows that the results of constitutive identification using the area directly under the indenter is reliable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1027)

Pages:

86-90

Citation:

Online since:

April 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chen H X, Cao H J, Huang X M. Simulation analysis of in-plane compression on three-dimensional spacer fabric composite J. Materials Science Forum. 971(2019) 36-44.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.971.36

Google Scholar

[2] Michael May, Noah Ledford, Matti Isakov, et al. The effect of strain rate on the orientation of the fracture plane in a unidirectional polymer matrix composite under transverse compression loading J. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 138(2020) 106057.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106057

Google Scholar

[3] Lucas L.Vignoli, Marcelo A.Savi, Pedro M.C.L. Pacheco, et al. Micromechanical analysis of transversal strength of composite laminae J. Composite Structures. 250(2020) 112546.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112546

Google Scholar

[4] Yuwu Zhang, Shuaishuai Wang, LuhuiYan. Transverse compressive characteristics of fiber reinforced cementitious composites tubes J. Thin-Walled Structures. 150(2020) 106645.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106645

Google Scholar

[5] Kamae T, Drzal L T. Carbon fiber/epoxy composite property enhancement through incorporation of carbon nanotubes at the fiber-matrix interphase-Part I: The development of carbon nanotube coated carbon fibers and the evaluation of their adhesion J. Composites Part A. 43(2012) 1569-1577.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.016

Google Scholar

[6] Rizvi Z H, Sembdner K, Suman A, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of thermo-mechanical properties for nano-geocomposite J. International Journal of Thermophysics. (2019).

DOI: 10.1007/s10765-019-2518-0

Google Scholar

[7] Zhou Y, Hosur M, Jeelani S, et al. Fabrication and characterization of carbon fiber reinforced clay/epoxy composite J. Journal of Materials Science. 47(2012) 5002-5012.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6376-4

Google Scholar

[8] Peng Pai, Zhao Meiying, Wang Wenzhi. Transverse strength prediction of composite materials via micromechanics model J. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering. 36(2017): 1611-1618.

Google Scholar

[9] Quick T, Safriet S, Mollenhauer D, et al. Compression testing of micro-scale unidirectional polymer matrix composites, 8th ed., Springer International Publishing, (2016).

Google Scholar

[10] Hussien A, Moehring M, Schwall C, et al. On compressive response of IM7/8552 lamina- a theoretical & experimental review[C]// Aiaa/asme/asce/ahs/asc Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference. Aiaa/asme/ahs Adaptive Structures Conference Aiaa. Hawaii: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronantics, Inc, 2013: 1-17.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-1766

Google Scholar

[11] Makeev A, He Y, Carpentier P, et al. A method for measurement of multiple constitutive properties for composite materials J. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 43(2012): 2199-2210.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.021

Google Scholar

[12] Julia C. Accurate three-dimensional characterization of the nonlinear material constitutive properties for laminated composite materials D. PhD thesis. Texas: University of Texas at Arlington, (2015).

Google Scholar

[13] He T, Liu L and Makeev A. Uncertainty analysis in composite material properties characterization using digital image correlation and finite element model updating J. Composite Structures. 184(2017) 337-51.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.009

Google Scholar

[14] Makeev A, Carpentier P, Shonkwiler B. Methods to measure interlaminar tensile modulus of composites J. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 56(2014) 256-261.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.018

Google Scholar

[15] He T, Liu L, Makeev A, et al. Characterization of stress–strain behavior of composites using digital image correlation and finite element analysis J. Composite Structures. 140(2016) 84-93.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.018

Google Scholar

[16] He Y, Makeev A. Nonlinear shear behavior and interlaminar shear strength of unidirectional polymer matrix composites: A numerical study J. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 51(2014):1263-1273.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.12.014

Google Scholar

[17] He Tiren, Liu Liu, Xu Jifeng. Digital image correlation aided method for identification of nonlinear constitutive parameters of IM7/8552 carbon fiber reinforced epoxy unidirectional laminate along thickness direction J. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica. 38(2021).

Google Scholar

[18] ASTM Standard D 2344/D 2344M, Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates S. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, (2006).

Google Scholar