Production of Porous Bioactive Glass (13-93)/Poly Ethylene Glycol Composite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Defects

Article Preview

Abstract:

Using the sol-gel process, glass powder was made. After the preparation method of the glass powder, x-ray analytical (XRD), particle size analysis and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) were performed. The particle size analysis of manufactured glass (13-93) is found to be about 2.978 μm. (XRD) mode analysis suggested that the resulting porous scaffolds were amorphous. Using the process of salt leaching to create bioactive glass scaffolds (13-93) with structural and physical properties suitable for the human trabecular bone. XRD spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and FTIR after sintering at temperature 750 °C were used to investigate the microstructure and chemical bonding of the porous scaffolds. The synthesized scaffold was soaked in medium of the simulated body fluid (SBF) and examined by SEM and XRD analysis in order to evaluate bioactivity. From the SEM morphology analysis results, it was noticed that the scaffolds comprised open and interconnected pores with a porosity range of 75-78%. High bioactivity of pours scaffolds was reported to have been observed after soaking 7days in SBF media because of the formation of apatite layer on its surfaces. Keywords: bioactive glass (13-93), scaffold, salt leaching method, SBF, sol-gel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1039)

Pages:

510-517

Citation:

Online since:

July 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Huawei Q, Hongya F, Zhenyu H and Yang S 2019 Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering scaffolds: a review RSC Adv. 9 26252-26262.

DOI: 10.1039/c9ra05214c

Google Scholar

[2] Census B 2010 Health and Nutrition Washington 117.

Google Scholar

[3] Guilin L, Yufei M, Xu C, Lixin J, Mingming W, Yang H, Yanfeng L, Haobo P and Changshun R 2017 13-93 bioactive glass/alginate composite scaffolds 3D printed under mild conditions for bone regeneration RSC Adv. 7 11880–11889.

DOI: 10.1039/c6ra27669e

Google Scholar

[4] Xin L, Rahaman M, Hilmas G and Sonny B 2013 Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair Acta Biomater 9 7025-34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.026

Google Scholar

[5] Elisa F, Gianpaolo S, Cristina B, Enrica V and Francesco B 2019 Bread-Derived Bioactive Porous Scaffolds: An Innovative and Sustainable Approach to Bone Tissue Engineering molecules 24 2954.

DOI: 10.3390/molecules24162954

Google Scholar

[6] Rahaman N, Day E, Bal S, Fu Q, Jung B, Bonewald F and Tomsia P 2011 Bioactive glass in tissue engineering Acta Biomater 7 2355–73.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016

Google Scholar

[7] Aylin M 2015 Preparation, in vitro mineralization and osteoblast cell response of electrospun 13-93 bioactive glass nanofibers Mater Sci. Eng. 53 262 -271.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.04.037

Google Scholar

[8] Liu X, Rahaman M, Fu Q and Tomsia A 2012 Porous and strong bioactive glass (13–93) scaffolds prepared by unidirectional freezing of camphene-based suspensions Acta Biomater 8 415–23.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.034

Google Scholar

[9] Doiphode N, Huang T, Leu M and Rahaman M 2011 Freeze extrusion fabrication of 13–93 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair J Mater Sci Mater Med 22 515–23.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4236-4

Google Scholar

[10] Huang T, Doiphode N, Rahaman M, Leu M, BAL B and Day D 2011 Porous and strong bioactive glass (13–93) scaffolds prepared by freeze extrusion fabrication Mater Sci Eng 31 1482–90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2011.06.004

Google Scholar

[11] Deliormanli A and Rahaman M 2012 Direct-write assembly of silicate and borate bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair J Eur Ceram Soc. 32 3637–46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.05.005

Google Scholar

[12] Fadilah D, Rosaniza I, Normahira M and Mariatti J 2018 Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional bioceramic scaffolds: Effect on pores size, porosity and compressive strength Ceramics International 44 18400–18407.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.056

Google Scholar

[13] Bahaa M, Mahmoud A and Abdullah M 2015 Characterization, in situ electrical conductivity and thermal behavior of immobilized PEG on MCM-41 Electrochem. Sci. 10 4873-4887.

Google Scholar

[14] Sin D, Miao S, Liu G, Fan W, Chadwick G, Yan C and Friis T 2010 Polyurethane (PU) scaffolds prepared by solvent casting/particulate leaching (SCPL) combined with centrifugation. Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications 30 78-85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2009.09.002

Google Scholar

[15] Agda A, Dickson A, Luisa L, Sandhra M, Herman S and Marivalda M 2013 Synthesis, characterization and cytocompatibility of spherical bioactive glass nanoparticles for potential hard tissue engineering applications Biomed. Mater 8 025011.

DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/8/2/025011

Google Scholar

[16] Xin L, Mohammed N, Yongxing L, Sonny B and Lynda F 2013 Enhanced bone regeneration in rate calvarial defects implanted with surface-modified and BMP-loaded bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds Acta biomater 7 7506-7517.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.039

Google Scholar