Copper Layer on an Aluminum Door Frame to Prevent Spread of Bacteria

Article Preview

Abstract:

The spread of disease by bacteria and viruses is very susceptible to outbreaks in public facilities through direct and indirect contact. Indirect contact occurs through intermediate such as housing equipment made of aluminum. One thing that people touch the most is door handles and frames. Aluminum frames are generally anodized to give a color effect because painted directly is difficult. Anodized products generally have a pore structure so that they can easily become an ideal place to grow and colonize bacteria and viruses. To overcome this, the coating process is carried out by electroplating. In this study, aluminum was treated with anodization and non-anodization. The concentration of sulfuric acid solution used was 0.5 M; 1M and 2M. The current used is 0.6A; 0.9A and 1.2M. Increasing the sulfuric acid concentration will increase the efficiency of the cathodic current and increase the mass of the deposit per unit area. Observation of the microstructure with an optical microscope shows the structure formed is dendritic in which the nucleus is continuous. The smooth and flat surface makes aluminum safe to be used and does not become a medium for bacteria or viruses to stick at aluminum surfaces.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1057)

Pages:

197-204

Citation:

Online since:

March 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Besinisc, S.D. Besinisc, H. Le, C. Tredwin, and R. Handy, Antibacterial activity and biofilm inhibition by surface modified titanium alloy medical implants following application ofsilver, titanium dioxide and hydroxyapatite nanocoatings Nanotoxicology 11(3) (2017), 327-338.

DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1299890

Google Scholar

[2] U. Danookdharree, H. Le, R. Handy, and C. Tredwin, Antibacterial coating made of strongly adhered nanosilver to titania nanotubes for dental implants (2015).

Google Scholar

[3] G. Chi, S. Yao, J. Fan, W. Zhang, & H. Wang, Antibacterial activity of anodized aluminum with deposited silver. Surface and Coatings Technology (2002) 157(2-3), 162-165.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(02)00150-0

Google Scholar

[4] H. Klasen, A historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns. II. Renewed interest for silver Burns, (2000) 26(2) 131-138.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4179(99)00116-3

Google Scholar

[5] M. Hans, S. Mathews, F. Mücklich, and M. Solioz, Physicochemical properties of copper important for its antibacterial activity and development of a unified model Biointerphases, (2016) 11(1), 018902.

DOI: 10.1116/1.4935853

Google Scholar

[6] S. Medici, M. Peana, V.M. Nurchi, J.I. Lachowicz, G. Crisponi, and M.A. Zoroddu, Noble metals in medicine: Latest advances.Coordination Chemistry Reviews, (2015) 284, 329-350.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.08.002

Google Scholar

[7] A. Różańska, A. Chmielarczykc, D. Romaniszyn, A. Sroka-Oleksiak, M. Bulanda, M. Walkowicz, T. and Knych, Antimicrobial properties of selected copper alloys on Staphylococcus Aureus and Escherichia Coli in different simulations of environmental conditions: with vs. without organic contamination. International journal of environmental research and public health, (2017) 14(7), 813.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14070813

Google Scholar

[8] H. Michels, S. Wilks, J. Noyce, C. and Keevil, Copper alloys for human infectious disease control Stainless steel (2005) 77000(55.0), 27.20.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Heinonen, E. Huttunen-Saarivirta, J.P. Nikkanen, M. Raulio, O. Priha, J. Laakso, and E. Levänen, Antibacterial properties and chemical stability of superhydrophobic silver-containing surface produced by sol–gel route Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 453, (2014) 149-161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.04.037

Google Scholar

[10] A. Tiwari, A. Chaturvedi, Antimicrobial coatings—Technology advancement or scientific myth. Handbook of Antimicrobial Coatings, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811982-2.00001-9

Google Scholar

[11] A.B. Monk, V. Kanmukhla, K. Trinder, and G. Borkow, Potent bactericidal efficacy of copper oxide impregnated non-porous solid surfaces BMC microbiology (2014) 14(1), 57.

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-57

Google Scholar

[12] C.E. Santo, N. Taudte, D.H. Nies, and G. Grass, Contribution of copper ion resistance to survival of Escherichia coli on metallic copper surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., (2008) 74(4), 977-986.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01938-07

Google Scholar

[13] H.K Adrian, Pengaruh Variasi Konsentrasi 10-15% Larutan Asam Sulfat (H2SO4) Pada Proses Anodizing Aluminium Teknik Mesin, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Yogyakarta, (2017).

DOI: 10.30811/jmst.v4i1.1739

Google Scholar

[14] Schlesinger M, Paunovic M 2011 Modern electroplating. John Wiley & Sons. Vol 55. (2011).

Google Scholar