Paper Titles

The Effect of Orientation Angle and Layer Thickness on Surface Roughness of ABS Material on FDM
p.3

A Preliminary Study of Isolation and Characterization of Nanocrystalline Cellulose from Microcrystalline Cellulose by Acid Hydrolysis Process
p.11

Preparation of Modified Starch Nanoparticles from Beneng Taro (Xanthosoma undipes K. Koch) as Active Packaging Materials via Nanoprecipitation Method
p.19

Electrical Conductivity of SDBS-Assisted Polyaniline Doped with HCl
p.26

Mechanical and Antibacterial Properties of Chitosan-PLA Film Containing Cinnamon and Ginger Essential Oil for Milkfish Satay Packaging
p.32

High Strength of Aluminium-Based Composites by Different Methods of Severe Plastic Deformation (SPD)
p.40

Acetylation of Bacterial Cellulose from a Mixture of Palm Flour Liquid Waste and Coconut Water: The Effect of Acetylation Time on Yield and Identification of Cellulose Acetate
p.48

Analyze of Geometric Characteristic of Powder Reinforced Composite Material from Liquid Waste for Part of Motor Vehicle
p.55

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 1057The Effect of Orientation Angle and Layer...

The Effect of Orientation Angle and Layer Thickness on Surface Roughness of ABS Material on FDM

Article Preview

Abstract:

Surface roughness of ABS material on FDM process due to different orientation angle and layer thickness are investigated using an experimental method. The aim of this paper is to determine the effect of orientation angle and layer thickness on surface roughness on 3-dimension FDM printing on ABS material. A rectangle model with 60 mm length,10 mm in width, and 10 mm in height is used in this research. The orientation angle of model is 30, 45, and 60 degrees in layer thickness of 0.15 mm and 0.25 mm. The results indicates that the different orientation angle of the layer thickness causes the roughness value of the printed surface. The roughness surface value increases along with increasing of the orientation angle. The highest surface roughness value occurs at 60 degrees orientation angle in 0.15 mm layer thickness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Broad Exposure to Science and Technology II

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1057)

Pages:

3-10

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-m37s90

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2022

Authors:

Ahmad Kholil*, Eko Arif Syaefuddin, Agung Premono, Farhan Nugraha

Keywords:

FDM Technology, Layer Thickness, Orientation Angle, Surface Roughness

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. T. Dwiyati, A. Kholil, R. Riyadi, and S. E. Putra, 2019, Influence of layer thickness and 3D printing direction on tensile properties of ABS material, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1402(6) 0–6.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1402/6/066014

[2] P. Alexander, S. Allen, and D. Dutta, 1998, Part orientation and build cost determination in layered manufacturing, CAD Comput. Aided Des., 30(5) 343–356, (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4485(97)00083-3

[3] M. Taufik and P. K. Jain, 2013, Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: A review, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., 27(1–3) 47–73.

[4] O. A. Mohamed, S. H. Masood, and J. L. Bhowmik, 2015, Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects, Adv. Manuf., 3(1) 42–53.

DOI: 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7

[5] E. Yasa, O. Poyraz, E. U. Solakoglu, G. Akbulut, and S. Oren, 2016, A Study on the Stair Stepping Effect in Direct Metal Laser Sintering of a Nickel-based Superalloy, Procedia CIRP, 45 175–178.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.068

[6] I. Buj-Corral, A. Domínguez-Fernández, and R. Durán-Llucià, 2019, Influence of print orientation on surface roughness in fused deposition modeling (FDM) processes, Materials (Basel), 12(23).

DOI: 10.3390/ma12233834

[7] M. S. Alsoufi and A. E. Elsayed, 2017, How Surface Roughness Performance of Printed Parts Manufactured by Desktop FDM 3D Printer with PLA+ is Influenced by Measuring Direction, Am. J. Mech. Eng., 5(5) 211–222.

[8] Kovan V, Tezel T, Topal ES, and Camurlu HE, 2018, Printing Parameters Effect on Surface Characteristics of 3D Printed Pla Materials, Mach. Technol. Mater., 12(7) 266–269.

[9] L. Di Angelo, P. Di Stefano, and A. Marzola, 2017, Surface quality prediction in FDM additive manufacturing, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 93(9–12) 3655–3662.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0763-6

[10] P. Sreedhar, C. MathikumarManikandan, and G. Jothi, 2012, Experimental Investigation of Surface Roughness for Fused Deposition Modeled Part with Different Angular Orientation, Int. J. Adv. Des. Manuf. Technol., 5(3) 21–28.

[11] N. Vidakis, M. Petousis, N. Vaxevanidis, and J. Kechagias, 2020, Surface roughness investigation of poly-jet 3D printing, Mathematics, 8(10) 1–14.

DOI: 10.3390/math8101758

[12] K. Kumar and G. S. Kumar, 2015, An experimental and theoretical investigation of surface roughness of poly-jet printed parts: This paper explains how local surface orientation affects surface roughness in a poly-jet process, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 10(1) 23–34, (2015).

DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2014.999218

[13] H. S. Byun and K. H. Lee, 2005, Determination of the optimal build direction for different rapid prototyping processes using multi-criterion decision making, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 22(1) 69–80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2005.03.001

[14] M. S. Alsoufi, M. W. Alhazmi, D. K. Suker, M. Yunus, and R. O. Malibari, 2019, From 3D models to FDM 3D prints: Experimental study of chemical treatment to reduce stairs-stepping of semi-sphere profile, AIMS Mater. Sci., 6(6) 1086–1106.

DOI: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1086

[15] L. Hiegemann, C. Agarwal, C. Weddeling, and A. E. Tekkaya, 2016, Reducing the stair step effect of layer manufactured surfaces by ball burnishing, AIP Conf. Proc., 1769 1–7.

DOI: 10.1063/1.4963612

[16] I. Gibson, D. Rosen, and R. Stucker, 2015, Additive Manufacturing Technologies., 2nd Ed. New York: Springer.

[17] V. D. Sagias, K. I. Giannakopoulos, and C. Stergiou, 2018, Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymer Specimens, Procedia Struct. Integr., 10 85–90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.09.013