Research on Fatigue Properties and Fracture Mechanism of δ-TRIP Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, a new type of δ-TRIP steel was designed. The fatigue limit and S-N curve were measured by the fatigue testing machine. The fatigue fracture was observed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM), and influencing factors of fatigue crack initiation were analyzed. The results show that the fatigue limit of δ-TRIP steel is 361MPa, and fatigue cracks are initiated on the surface of the sample. In the initial stage of fatigue crack initiation, the crack growth rate of the specimen is relatively slow under the action of stress. As the crack continues to expand, the magnitude and direction of the stress on the crack tip change and the stress situation becomes more complicated. The crack begins to branch and grows in different directions The metastable retained austenite in δ-TRIP steel undergoes phase transformation under the action of external force, which will absorb a lot of energy. At the same time, there are many large angle grain boundaries in the steel hindering the crack propagation. These two characteristics make the δ-TRIP steel has excellent fatigue performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1072)

Pages:

29-35

Citation:

Online since:

October 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kozlov P N. Assessing the fatigue strength of structural materials by assuming equivalence of a complex stress state and simple extension. Review of Experimental Data and Preliminary Analysis[J]. Russian Engineering Research, 2022, 41(12):1145-1148.

DOI: 10.3103/s1068798x2112025x

Google Scholar

[2] Hong J Z, Song S X, WANG J F, et al. Effect of Nb-Mo microalloying on microstructure and mechanical properties of δ-TRIP steel [J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(5): 1-6.

Google Scholar

[3] Shiri S G, Jahromi S A J, Palizdar Y, et al. Unexpected effect of Nb addition as a microalloying element on mechanical properties of δ-TRIP steels [J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2016, 23(9): 988-996.

DOI: 10.1016/s1006-706x(16)30148-0

Google Scholar

[4] Yi H L, Chen P, Wang G D, et al. δ-TRIP steel: Physical and mechanical metallurgy [J]. Engineering Sciences, 2014, 16(2): 18-30.

Google Scholar

[5] Delagnes D, Lamesle P, Mathon M H, et al. Influence of silicon content on the precipitation of secondary carbides and fatigue properties of a 5%Cr tempered martensitic steel[J]. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2018, 394(1-2):435-444.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.11.050

Google Scholar

[6] Richman R H, Landgraf R W. Some effects of retained austenite on the fatigue resistance of carburized steel[J]. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1975, 6(5):955.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02661347

Google Scholar

[7] Peterson R E. The role of stress distribution in fatigue [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1961, 1(4): 105-115.

Google Scholar

[8] Lei B M, Tran V, Taheri S, et al. Effects of biaxial mean stress on the critical plane orientation under biaxial tension/compression fatigue loading conditions [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2014, 66: 194-206.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.04.004

Google Scholar

[9] Ida Y. Stress concentration and unsteady propagation of longitudinal shear cracks [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1973, 78(17): 3418-3429.

DOI: 10.1029/jb078i017p03418

Google Scholar

[10] González-Doncel G, Torralba M, Ruano O A. Fracture of Al-4%Cu-0.1%Fe single crystals [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1989, 24(7): 2594-2602.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01174531

Google Scholar

[11] Bezensek B, Hancock J W. The re-characterisation of complex defects - Part I: Fatigue and ductile tearing [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2004, 71(7-8): 981-1000.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00155-3

Google Scholar

[12] Yagi J, Tomita Y, Fujimoto Y, et al. Studies on the fatigue crack propagation rate (2nd Report) [J]. Rare Metal Materials & Engineering, 2009, 1981(149): 250-259.

DOI: 10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1981.250

Google Scholar

[13] Predan J, Gubeljak N, Fischer F D, et al. Prediction of the growth rate and propagation direction of fatiguecracks with the configurational forces model [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2009, 37(2): 211-229.

Google Scholar

[14] Mcauliffe C, Waisman H. A unified model for metal failure capturing shear banding and fracture [J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2015, 65: 131-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.08.016

Google Scholar