The Effect of Activator Type and Concentration on the Performance of Activated Carbon from Bengkirai Wood as Adsorbent to Reduce Iron Content in Water

Article Preview

Abstract:

Iron is a major impurity in many water resources and leads to contamination in drinking water. One technology that can be used to reduce the iron content is adsorption using activated carbon. Activated carbon can be derived from biomass including forestry and agricultural waste. To produce an economic adsorbent, the researcher used bengkirai wood sawdust waste which contains 52.9% cellulose and 24% lignin. This material is treated by physical and chemical activation to produce activated carbon. However, there is no information on the effect of the type and concentration of activator on the performance of bengkirai wood activated carbon in reducing iron content. Thus, the purpose of this research is to understand the effect of activator type and concentration on the performance of activated carbon from bengkirai wood to adsorb iron content. There are five steps in this research which are preparation, carbonization, chemical activation, characterization and performance test. The raw material is prepared by screening to get an uniform size of bengkirai wood sawdust. Then, the uniformed bengkirai sawdust is physically activated in the carbonization step by heating it in the furnace at 600°C for 2 hours. After that, the carbon is activated using acid which are HCl, HNO3, and H2SO4 with concentrations of 0.1 M, 0.3 M and 0.5 M. The characterization done in this study are iodine number test and functional group test using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The final step is performance test of activated carbon to adsorb iron in the water by contacting the activated carbon into water containing iron for 1 hour. The concentration of iron in the water is measured using Uv vis spectofometry. The result shows that the carbon activation with H2SO4 0.1 M produce activated carbon with the highest iodine number compared to the other type of activator and concentration. The iodine number for this activated carbon is 839.76 mg/g. However, the activated carbon treated using HNO3 shows the best performance to adsorb iron in water.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1076)

Pages:

171-179

Citation:

Online since:

December 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] World Health Organization, Iron in drinking-water. WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality,, Who/Sde/Wsh/03.04/08, vol. 2, p.4, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] A. G. Tekerlekopoulou, S. Pavlou, and D. V. Vayenas, Removal of ammonium, iron and manganese from potable water in biofiltration units: A review,, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., vol. 88, no. 5, p.751–773, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4031

Google Scholar

[3] N. Khatri and S. Tyagi, Influences of natural and anthropogenic factors on surface and groundwater quality in rural and urban areas,, Front. Life Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, p.23–39, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1080/21553769.2014.933716

Google Scholar

[4] A. bin Jusoh, W. H. Cheng, W. M. Low, A. Nora'aini, and M. J. Megat Mohd Noor, Study on the removal of iron and manganese in groundwater by granular activated carbon,, Desalination, vol. 182, no. 1–3, p.347–353, 2005,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.022

Google Scholar

[5] BLHK-Balikpapan, Laporan Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah Kota Balikpapan,, (2015).

Google Scholar

[6] V. Kumar, P. K. Bharti, M. Talwar, A. K. Tyagi, and P. Kumar, Studies on high iron content in water resources of Moradabad district (UP), India,, Water Sci., vol. 31, no. 1, p.44–51, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wsj.2017.02.003

Google Scholar

[7] N. Resources, Iron in Drinking Water DG035 2017,, p.2, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://dnr.wi.gov/files/PDF/pubs/DG/DG0035.pdf.

Google Scholar

[8] Q. qing Zheng et al., Iron overload promotes erythroid apoptosis through regulating HIF-1a/ROS signaling pathway in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome,, Leuk. Res., vol. 58, no. 600, p.55–62, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.04.005

Google Scholar

[9] V. Alimohammadi, M. Sedighi, and E. Jabbari, Experimental study on efficient removal of total iron from wastewater using magnetic-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes,, Ecol. Eng., vol. 102, p.90–97, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.044

Google Scholar

[10] E. A. Boyle, J. M. Edmond, and E. R. Sholkovitz, The mechanism of iron removal in estuaries,, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, vol. 41, no. 9, p.1313–1324, 1977,.

DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90075-8

Google Scholar

[11] K. Kan, CC; Wan, MW; Chen, WH; Phatai, P; Wittayakun, J; Li, The preliminary study of iron and manganese removal from groundwater by NaOCl oxidation and MF filtration,, Heal. Environ. Res. Online, vol. 22, no. 1, p.25–30, (2012).

Google Scholar

[12] S. Bordoloi, S. K. Nath, S. Gogoi, and R. K. Dutta, Arsenic and iron removal from groundwater by oxidation-coagulation at optimized pH: Laboratory and field studies,, J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 260, p.618–626, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.017

Google Scholar

[13] N. Khatri, S. Tyagi, and D. Rawtani, Journal of Water Process Engineering Recent strategies for the removal of iron from water : A review,, J. Water Process Eng., vol. 19, no. 13, p.291–304, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.08.015

Google Scholar

[14] K.H. Choo, H. Lee, and S. J. Choi, Iron and manganese removal and membrane fouling during UF in conjunction with prechlorination for drinking water treatment,, J. Memb. Sci., vol. 267, no. 1–2, p.18–26, 2005,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.05.021

Google Scholar

[15] J.L. Lin, C. Huang, J.R. Pan, and Y.S. Wang, Fouling mitigation of a dead-end microfiltration by mixing-enhanced preoxidation for Fe and Mn removal from groundwater,, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 419, p.87–93, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.11.053

Google Scholar

[16] K. Jasiewicz and R. Pietrzak, The influence of pore generating agent on the efficiency of copper and iron ions removal from liquid phase by polyethersulfone membranes,, Chem. Eng. J., vol. 228, p.449–454, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.005

Google Scholar

[17] X. Du et al., Removal of iron, manganese and ammonia from groundwater using a PAC-MBR system: The anti-pollution ability, microbial population and membrane fouling,, Desalination, vol. 403, p.97–106, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.002

Google Scholar

[18] Y. Artioli, Adsorption,, Encycl. Ecol. Five-Volume Set, p.60–65, 2008,.

Google Scholar

[19] S. S. Tahir and N. Rauf, Removal of Fe(II) from the wastewater of a galvanized pipe manufacturing industry by adsorption onto bentonite clay,, J. Environ. Manage., vol. 73, no. 4, p.285–292, 2004,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.009

Google Scholar

[20] M. Danish and T. Ahmad, A review on utilization of wood biomass as a sustainable precursor for activated carbon production and application,, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 87, no. October 2017, p.1–21, 2018,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.003

Google Scholar

[21] A. Nurhadiansyah and Irfana, Sistesis dan Karakterisasi Karbon Aktif dari Limbah Serbuk Kayu Bangkirai sebagai Adsorben Logam Fe pada Air Gambut.,, Universitas Tanjungpura, (2018).

DOI: 10.31851/redoks.v5i1.4027

Google Scholar

[22] R. C. Bansal, J.-B. Donnet, and F. Stoeckli, Active carbon. (1988).

Google Scholar

[23] C. Saka, BET, TG-DTG, FT-IR, SEM, iodine number analysis and preparation of activated carbon from acorn shell by chemical activation with ZnCl2,, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, vol. 95, p.21–24, 2012,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.12.020

Google Scholar

[24] N. Esfandiar, B. Nasernejad, and T. Ebadi, Removal of Mn(II) from groundwater by sugarcane bagasse and activated carbon (a comparative study): Application of response surface methodology (RSM),, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 20, no. 5, p.3726–3736, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.072

Google Scholar

[25] M. Olivares-Marín, C. Fernández-González, A. Macías-García, and V. Gómez-Serrano, Preparation of activated carbon from cherry stones by physical activation in air. Influence of the chemical carbonisation with H2SO4,, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, vol. 94, no. Complete, p.131–137, 2012,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.019

Google Scholar

[26] N. Yanou Rachel et al., Antibacterial properties of AgNO3-activated carbon composite on Escherichia coli: inhibition action,, Int. J. Adv. Chem., vol. 6, no. 1, p.46, 2018,.

DOI: 10.14419/ijac.v6i1.9048

Google Scholar

[27] F.M. Tarmidzi, M. Anindita, S. Putri, A. Novi, and R. Alviany, Pengaruh Aktivator Asam Sulfat dan Natrium Klorida pada Karbon Aktif Batang Semu Pisang untuk Adsorpsi Fe,, vol. 5, no. 1, p.17–21, (2021).

DOI: 10.20961/equilibrium.v5i1.53572

Google Scholar

[28] P. Maneechakr and S. Karnjanakom, Environmental surface chemistries and adsorption behaviors of metal cations (Fe3+, Fe2+, Ca2+ and Zn2+) on manganese dioxide-modified green biochar,, RSC Adv., vol. 9, no. 42, p.24074–24086, 2019,.

DOI: 10.1039/c9ra03112j

Google Scholar