Effect of Direct Rolling of Without-Heating on the Differentiation of Mechanical Properties of Rebar

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper focuses on the mechanical property differentiation and phase content differentiation of HRB400 rebars under the direct rolling of without-heating (DROW) process. The results showed that the temperature distribution from the head region to the tail region of the billet before rolling under the DROW process was different compared to the traditional hot rolling (THR) process, which resulting in the difference of each phase volume fractions and the grain size of the rebar. Compared with the THR process, the phase distribution of the rebars under the DROW process is not uniform, showing the characteristics of low ferrite content in the head region, followed by the tail region, and the highest in the middle region. It was demonstrated that the DROW process could improve the mechanical properties of the rebar, but the difference in phase content and grain size distribution leads to a large variability in the enhancement of the mechanical properties of rebar rolled in different areas of the billet.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1078)

Pages:

173-178

Citation:

Online since:

December 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Zaky AI, El-Morsy A, El-Bitar T. Effect of different cooling rates on thermomechanically processed high-strength rebar steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(3), PP: 1565-1569, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.011.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.011

Google Scholar

[2] Ahmad M S. Effect of Sustained Elevated Temperature on Mechanical Behavior of Reinforcing Bar. Procedia Engineering, 173, PP: 905-909, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.139

Google Scholar

[3] Gardner L, Bu Y, Francis P, et al. Elevated temperature material properties of stainless steel reinforcing bar. Construction and Building Materials, 114, PP: 977-997, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.009

Google Scholar

[4] Xiao J, Hou Y, Huang Z. Beam test on bond behavior between high-grade rebar and high-strength concrete after elevated temperatures. Fire Safety Journal, 69, PP: 23-35, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.07.001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.07.001

Google Scholar

[5] Li L J, Huo X D, Guo L. Strengthening Mechanisms of Vanadium Micro-Alloyed Reinforcing Steel Bar. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 130, PP: 942-945, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.130-134.942.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.130-134.942

Google Scholar

[6] Lv Y K, Sheng G M, Huang Z H. High strain and low cycle fatigue behaviors of rebars produced by QST and V-N microalloying technology. Construction and Building Materials, 48, PP: 67-73, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.085.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.085

Google Scholar

[7] Lv Y K, Sheng G M, Jiao Y J. Effect of V/N ratio on the high strain and low cycle fatigue behaviors of V-N microalloyedrebars. Construction and Building Materials, 69, PP: 18-25, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.047.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.047

Google Scholar

[8] Wei J, Dong J H, Ke W. Corrosion resistant performance of a chemical quenched rebar in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(3), PP: 1243-1247, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.conbuildmat.2010.09.029.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.029

Google Scholar

[9] Wei J, Dong J H, Ke W. The influence of cooling processes on the corrosion performance of the rebar scale. Construction and Building Materials, 24(3), PP: 275-282, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.037.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.037

Google Scholar

[10] Ramesh S, Bhuvaneswari B, Palani G S, et al. Effects on corrosion resistance of rebar subjected to deep cryogenic treatment. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31(1), PP: 123-132, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1211-5.

DOI: 10.1007/s12206-016-1211-5

Google Scholar

[11] German M, Pamin J. FEM simulations of cracking in RC beams due to corrosion progress. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 15(4), PP: 1160-1172, 2015. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.acme.2014.12.010.

DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2014.12.010

Google Scholar

[12] Das B, Bakkar A, Khutia N, et al. Low Cycle Fatigue Performance Evaluation of TMT rebar. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(2), PP: 2554-2563, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr. 2017.02.109.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.109

Google Scholar

[13] Maksimov S, Bashkova J, Maksimova A. Modernization of Technology and Equipment for Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Rebar Production. Procedia Engineering, 206, PP: 1337-1341, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.641.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.641

Google Scholar

[14] Liu X, Su L, Liu X H. Effect of DROF process on the temperature field and roll force. Advanced Materials Research, 941-944, PP: 1885-1889, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ AMR.941-944.1885.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.941-944.1885

Google Scholar

[15] Liu X, Feng G H, Qi Y H. The Effect of Direct Rolling of Without-heating process on the Microstructure and Properties of a 400 MPa Rebar. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 317(1), PP: 012003, 2018. https://doi.org /10.1088/1757-899x/317/1/012003.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/317/1/012003

Google Scholar