Optimization of Geometric Design of Extruded Products Incorporating Properties, Cost and CO2 Footprint

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, a numerical simulation methodology has been applied to optimize the design of extruded aluminium products. The methodology, PRO3 TM , incorporates product properties, production-and material costs as well as CO2 footprint in an optimisation procedure. This allows for multi-objective optimisation and avoids sub-optimisation of for instance properties on the expense of production costs or CO2 emissions. The outcome that follows from this multi-objective optimisation procedure, is that the resulting profile cross section will be different when the optimisation is based solely on property considerations, than when costs and CO2 emissions are introduced in the optimisation procedure. The present methodology requires that the main processes and operations along the aluminium process chain are represented by physics based, predictive models of various types, including material-and mechanical models, in addition to cost-, and sustainability models. A standard multi-objective optimization algorithm is used to combine the models and for automatic running through-process simulations in iterations. In this article, the PRO3 TM methodology has been applied for optimisation of the profile cross section in case-studies with various user requirements. It has been demonstrated that the resulting cross section geometry depends on the specified relative importance of conflicting requirements like the desire for high productivity on the one hand, and the desire for low material costs and low CO2 emissions on the other.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1130)

Pages:

13-23

Citation:

Online since:

October 2024

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Furu and O. R. Myhr, "Method for the Optimization of Product Properties and Production Cost of Industrial Process," (2014).

Google Scholar

[2] O. R. Myhr, R. Østhus, J. Søreide and T. Furu, "A Novel Methodology for Optimization of Properties, Cost and Sustainability of Aluminium Extrusions," in ET2016, Orlando, (2016).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.877.625

Google Scholar

[3] T. Furu, R. Østhus and O. R. Myhr, "A Digital Twin for Production of Aluminium Extrusions," in ET2020, Orlando, (2022).

Google Scholar

[4] Hydro, "Aluminium Recycling," [Online]. Available: https://www.hydro.com/en-NO/aluminium/about-aluminium/aluminium-recycling/.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Reggiani, L. Donati and L. Tomesani, "Multi-goal optimization of industrial extrusion dies by means of meta-models," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 88, 2017.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Pelaccia, M. Negozio and B. D. L. Reggiani, "Assessment of the Optimization Strategy for Nitrogen Cooling Channel Design in Extrusion Dies," Key Engineering Materials, vol. 926, 2022.

DOI: 10.4028/p-f7i0y2

Google Scholar

[7] G. Zhao, H. Chen, C. Zhang and Y. Guan, "Multiobjective optimization design of porthole extrusion die using Pareto-based genetic," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 69, 2013.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-5124-5

Google Scholar

[8] N. Lebaal, F. Schmidt and S. Puissant, "Design and optimization of three-dimensional extrusion dies, using constraint optimization algorithm," Finite Element in Analysis and Design, vol. 45, no. 5, pp.333-340, 2009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2008.10.008

Google Scholar

[9] Z. Lin, X. Juchen, W. Xinyun and H. Guoan, "Optimization of die profile for improving die life in the hot extrusion process," Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 142, pp.659-664, 2003.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00686-1

Google Scholar

[10] S. T. Wang, R. S. Lee, H. Y. Li and C. H. Chen, "Optimal Die Design for Three-Dimensional Porthole Extrusion Using the Taguchi Method," IMechE, vol. 220, pp.1005-1009, 2006.

Google Scholar

[11] F. Gagliardi, G. Ambrogio, C. Ciancio and L. Filice, "Metamodeling technique for designing reengineered processes by historical data," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 45, 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.09.004

Google Scholar

[12] S. Jajimoggala, N. Murali Krishna and K. Syed, "Selection of optimal hot extrusion process parameters for AA6061using hybrid MCDM technique," Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 18, pp.278-290, 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.302

Google Scholar

[13] J. Blank and K. Deb, "pymoo: Multi-Objective Optimization in Python," doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990567, pp.89497-89509, (2020).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2990567

Google Scholar

[14] IMPETUS Afea Solver®, IMPETUS Afea AS.

Google Scholar

[15] O. R. Myhr, Ø. Grong and C. Schäfer, Metall. Mater. Trans A, vol. 46A, p.6018, (2015).

Google Scholar

[16] O. R. Myhr, Ø. Grong and K. O. Pedersen, Metall. Mater. Trans A, vol. 41A, p.2276, (2010).

Google Scholar

[17] O. R. Myhr, O. S. Hoppestad and T. Børvik, Metall. Mater. Trans A, vol. 49A, p.3592, (2018).

Google Scholar

[18] M. Iddberg, O. R. Myhr, A. Nesse and T. Furu, A Modelling Framework for Rapid Evaluation of Speed Limiations of Aluminium Profiles, Aluminium 2000, (2023).

Google Scholar

[19] Environmental Metrics Report, International Aluminium Institute, (2014).

Google Scholar

[20] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal and T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017

Google Scholar

[21] Addendum 57: UN Regulation No. 58.

Google Scholar