Optimal Selection of Machining Parameters for Minimization of Elementary Energy Consumption during Machining of 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

The dry turning was done on 304 austenitic stainless steel using a carbide insert (Tungaloy, SNMG 12 04 04). Speed, feed, and depth of cut (DOC) were the machining parameters. The chip reduction coefficient (CRC) and elementary energy consumption were the output responses. Twenty-seven experiments were performed by following the L27 Taguchi design plan-decoupled TOPSIS method. The minimal elementary energy consumption was attained at moderate speed (44.28 m/min.), high feed (0.20 mm/rev.), and low DOC (0.66 mm). This result has been validated by the fuzzy inference system (FIS) simulation. The details of minimising elementary energy consumption have been explained by implementing Taguchi design plans, TOPSIS, chip macrographs, and FIS simulation studies. The very thin continuous chip (very low CRC) was found at optimal parameters, indicating minimal energy consumption during machining. The aim of the work is to find out the machining condition at which the elementary energy consumption during machining was minimum. The validation of the optimal solution by qualitative assessment and by the FIS simulation emphasizes the novelty of the work. The nature of the study is newer in kind with validation of results. The simulation result shows the increasing trend of closeness coefficient (CC) with increased feed at moderate speed and low depth of cut (DOC).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1133)

Pages:

3-9

Citation:

Online since:

December 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Kong, D. Nhg DR, V.T. Shi, Method for optimizing energy consumption in machining manufacturing process, Mathematical problems in engineering, (2022), Article ID 8300666.

DOI: 10.1155/2022/8300666

Google Scholar

[2] J. Ma, X. Ge, S. I. Chang, S. Lei S, Assesment of cutting energy consumption and energy efficiency in machining of 4140 steel, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 74 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6101-3

Google Scholar

[3] G.Y. Zhao, Z.Y. Liu, Y. He, H.J. Cao, Y.B. Guo, Energy consumption in machining: Classification, prediction, and reduction strategy. Energy 133(15) (2017) 142-157.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.110

Google Scholar

[4] Q. Wang, F. Liu, X. Wang. Multi-objective optimization of machining parameters considering energy consumption. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 71 (2014) 1133-1142.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-5547-z

Google Scholar

[5] J. Lv, R. Tang, W. Tang, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, S. Jia. An investigation into reducing the spindle acceleration energy consumption of machine tools. Journal of cleaner production. 143 (2017) 794-803.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.045

Google Scholar

[6] SAA. Bagaber, A.R. Yusoff, Sustainable optimization of dry turning od stainless steel based on energy consumption and machining cost. 8th CIRP conference on high performance cutting (HPC), Procedia CIRP 77 (2018) 397-400.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.300

Google Scholar

[7] S. Pawanr, G.K. Garg, S. Routroy, Modelling of variable energy consumption for CNC machine tools, 28th CIRP conference on life cycle engineering, Procedia CIRP 98 (2021) 247-251.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.038

Google Scholar

[8] S. Pawanr, G.K. Garg, Selection of optimum cutting parameters for minimization of specific energy consumption during machining of Al 6061, journal of physics. Conference series, IOP publishing ltd, 1240 012064.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/012064

Google Scholar

[9] J. Lv, R. Tang, W. Tang, S. Jia, Y. Liu, Y. Coo. An investigation into methods for predicting material removal energy consumption in turning, Journal of cleaner production. 193 (2018) 128-139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.035

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Guo , J. Loenders, J. Duflou, B. Lauwers, Optimization of energy consumption and surface quality in finish turning. 5th CIRP Conference on high performance cutting , Procedia CIRP 1 (2012) 512-517 http://dx.doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.091

Google Scholar

[11] V.P. Astakhov, The assessment of plastic deformation in metal cutting, Journal of materials processing technology. 146 (2004) 193-202.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.015

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Lee, S. Yang, S. Chang, Assessment of chip breaking characteristics using new chip-breaking index. Journal of materials processing technology. 173 (2006) 166-171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.057

Google Scholar

[13] A.K. Sahu, N. K. Sahu, A.K. Sahu, M. S. Rajput, H. K. Narang, T-SAW methodology for parametric evaluation of surface integrity aspects in AlMg3 (AA5754) alloy Comparison with T-TOPSIS methodology, Measurement. 132 (2019) 309–323.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.037

Google Scholar

[14] S.R. Balasubramanian, T. Selvaraj, Application of integrated Taguchi and TOPSIS method for optimization of process parameters for dimensional accuracy in turning of EN25 steel, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 40 (4) (2017) 267–274 .

DOI: 10.1080/02533839.2017.1308233

Google Scholar

[15] B. Sen, S.A.L. Hussain, S. M. Mia, U. K. Mandal, S.P. Mondal, Selection of an ideal MQL-assisted milling condition: an NSGA-II-coupled TOPSIS approach for improving machinability of Inconel 690, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 103 (2019) 1811–1829.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03620-6

Google Scholar