A Comparative Study on Force Deformation Behaviour of Fe and Cu-Based SMA with NiTi SMA

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ni-Ti-based shape memory alloy (SMA) finds extensive applications, yet its high cost presents a challenge. As a cost-effective alternative, Fe and Cu-based SMAs have gained popularity. In this context, the present experimental study conducts tensile and cyclic tests on Ni-Ti, Cu-Al-Ni, and Fe-Mn-Si SMA bars to compare their mechanical behavior and assess their performance regarding stress-strain response, energy dissipation capacity, and residual deformation. The tensile test results show that Ni-Ti and Fe-based SMAs exhibit higher yield and ultimate stress, as well as failure strain, compared to Cu-based SMA. Moreover, cyclic tension-compression test results reveal that Ni-Ti SMA demonstrates a stable hysteresis loop with higher recovery residual strain compared to Cu-based and Fe-based SMAs. These findings underscore the potential of combining Ni-Ti and Fe-based SMAs as a viable alternative material for smart vibration control system design and retrofitting devices, offering higher energy dissipation capacity and larger ductility with good recentering ability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1133)

Pages:

41-46

Citation:

Online since:

December 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. DesRoches and B. Smith: Shape memory alloys in seismic resistant design and retrofit: a critical review of their potential and limitations, Journal of earthquake engineering 8(3) (2004), 415-429.

DOI: 10.1080/13632460409350495

Google Scholar

[2] O. E. Ozbulut, S. Hurlebaus and R. DesRoches: Seismic response control using shape memory alloys: a review, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 22(14),1531-1549 (2011).

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x11411220

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Wang, J. Luo, W. Kuang, M. Jin, G. Liu, X. Jin and Y. Shen: Strain Rate Effect on the Thermomechanical Behavior of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys: A Literature Review, Metals 13(1) (2022), 58.

DOI: 10.3390/met13010058

Google Scholar

[4] S. Gur and G.N. Frantziskonis: Linking simulations and experiments for the multiscale tracking of thermally induced martensitic phase transformation in NiTi SMA, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 24(7) (2016), 075006.

DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/24/7/075006

Google Scholar

[5] G. N. Frantziskonis and S. Gur: Length scale effects and multiscale modeling of thermally induced phase transformation kinetics in NiTi SMA, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 25(4) (2017), 045002.

DOI: 10.1088/1361-651x/aa6662

Google Scholar

[6] S. Gur and G. N. Frantziskonis, K. Muralidharan: Atomistic simulation of shape memory effect (SME) and superelasticity (SE) in nano-porous NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA), Computational Materials Science 152 (2018), 28-37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.031

Google Scholar

[7] S. Gur and G. N. Frantziskonis: Design of porous and graded NiTi smart energy absorbers considering synthetic uncertainty in parameters, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 32(16) (2021), 1759-1780.

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x20977908

Google Scholar

[8] L. Janke, C. Czaderski, M. Motavalli, and J. Ruth: Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures—Overview, limits and new ideas, Materials and structures 38(2005), 578-592.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02479550

Google Scholar

[9] A. Tabrizikahou, M. Kuczma, M. Łasecka-Plura, E. N. Farsangi, M. Noori, P. Gardoni, and S. Li: Application and modelling of Shape-Memory Alloys for structural vibration control: State-of-the-art review, Construction and Building Materials 342(2022), 127975.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127975

Google Scholar

[10] E. M. Mazzer, M. R. da Silva and P. Gargarella: Revisiting Cu-based shape memory alloys: Recent developments and new perspectives, Journal of Materials Research 37(1) (2022), 162-182.

DOI: 10.1557/s43578-021-00444-7

Google Scholar

[11] B. Duran, K. C. Atlı, and Ö. Avşar: Superelastic cyclic properties of Cu-Al-Mn and Ni-Ti shape memory alloys for seismic mitigation. In 5th World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE 20) (2020).

DOI: 10.11159/icsect20.117

Google Scholar

[12] S. N. S. Al-Humairi: Cu-based shape memory alloys: modified structures and their related properties, Recent Advancements in the Metallurgical Engineering and Electrodeposition, 25 (2020).

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86193

Google Scholar

[13] I. López-Ferreño, J. F. Gómez-Cortés, T. Breczewski, I. Ruiz-Larrea, M. L. Nó and J. M. San Juan: High-temperature shape memory alloys based on the Cu-Al-Ni system: design and thermomechanical characterization, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 9(5) (2020), 9972-9984.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.002

Google Scholar

[14] H. Fu, S. Xu, H. Zhao, H. Dong and J. Xie: Cyclic stress-strain response of directionally solidified polycrystalline Cu-Al-Ni shape memory alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 714(2017), 154-159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.234

Google Scholar

[15] H. Fu, S. Song, L. Zhuo, Z. Zhang and J. Xie: Enhanced mechanical properties of polycrystalline Cu-Al-Ni alloy through grain boundary orientation and composition control, Materials Science and Engineering: A 650(2016), 218-224.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.037

Google Scholar

[16] J. Ibarra, San Juan, E. H. Bocanegra and M. L. Nó: Evolution of microstructure and thermomechanical properties during superelastic compression cycling in Cu–Al–Ni single crystals, Acta Materialia 55(14) (2007), 4789-4798.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.012

Google Scholar

[17] B. Cladera, C. Weber, C. Leinenbach, M. Czaderski, Shahverdi and M. Motavalli: Iron-based shape memory alloys for civil engineering structures: An overview, Construction and building materials 63(2014), 281-293.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.032

Google Scholar

[18] X. Qiang, Y. Wu, Y. Wang and X. Jiang: Research Progress and Applications of Fe-Mn-Si-Based Shape Memory Alloys on Reinforcing Steel and Concrete Bridges, Applied Sciences13(6) (2023), 3404.

DOI: 10.3390/app13063404

Google Scholar

[19] R. A. U. Rahman, D. Juhre and T. Halle: Review of types, properties, and importance of ferrous based shape memory alloys, Korean Journal of Materials Research 28(7) (2018), 381-390.

DOI: 10.3740/mrsk.2018.28.7.381

Google Scholar

[20] X. L. Gu, Z. Y. Chen, Q. Q. Yu and E. Ghafoori: Stress recovery behavior of an Fe-Mn-Si shape memory alloy, Engineering Structures 243(2021), 112710.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112710

Google Scholar

[21] Z. X. Zhang, C. Fang, Q. He, W. Shi and F. Zhang: Fe-SMA–Based Shear Panel Damper: Solution Treatment, Design, and Seismic Performance, Journal of Structural Engineering 150(4) (2024), 04024027.

DOI: 10.1061/jsendh.steng-13132

Google Scholar

[22] S. Bhowmick and S.K. Mishra: FNCATB superelastic damper for seismic vibration mitigation, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 27(15) (2016), 2062-2077.

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x15620039

Google Scholar

[23] S. Bhowmick and S.K. Mishra: Ferrous SMA (FNCATB) based superelastic friction bearing Isolator (S-FBI) subjected to pulse type ground motions, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 100 (2017), 34-48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.037

Google Scholar

[24] ASTM, E8/E8M-16A Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. 2016.

Google Scholar

[25] MATLAB homepage, https://in.mathworks.com/

Google Scholar