Durability Scrutiny and Performance Prediction of Geopolymer Concrete Containing Bespoke Activator and Superplasticizer

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study relates to the development of geopolymer concrete (GPC) and empirical models which can be used to predict strength and durability under different curing temperatures. The binders and alkaline activators used for the GPC production were characterized to determine their physical and chemical properties. The partial and pure geopolymer concrete samples were produced. The partial replacement of Geopolymer concrete (GPC) samples was done with cement at varying percentages of 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5 and 20% to determine the optimum cement stabilization. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results show key absorbance level at the zone between 950.1 and 3250.12 cm−1. It means that enhancement of the laboratory-produced (bespoke) superplasticizer enhanced the performance of GPC by reducing the viscosity and enriching the flow behaviour of the concrete. The optimal geopolymer product showed substantial strength and durability enhancements at 70°C followed by declining values at temperatures above 70°C, indicating material deterioration. A positive correlation between hot-state temperature, strength and durability properties was also established. Furthermore, scrutiny of the model shows that overall dataset points for training and test sets are clustered close to the diagonal line, signifying that the model provides precise estimation of the strength and durability features. .

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1161)

Pages:

111-122

Citation:

Online since:

October 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.C. Arum, C. Arum, S.A Alabi, The Highs and Lows of Incorporating Pozzolans into Concrete and Mortar: A Review on Strength and Durability, Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH), 41 (2022) 197 –211.

DOI: 10.4314/njt.v41i2.1

Google Scholar

[2] J.A Adebola, C.M. Ikumapayi, C. Arum, Effectiveness of Rice Husk and Sugarcane Bagasse Ashes Blended Cement in Improving Properties of Concrete, Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 11 (2023) 1-19.

DOI: 10.4236/msce.2023.118001

Google Scholar

[3] M. Adeshokan, C. Arum, Comparison between the Compressive Strength of Binary and Ternary Alkaline activated Pozzolanic Concrete, Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 27 (2023) 747-752.

DOI: 10.4314/jasem.v27i4.15

Google Scholar

[4] C. Arum, S.P Akande, S.A. Alabi, Strength Evaluation of Pozzolanic Concrete Containing Calcined Ceramic Waste and Glass Waste Powder, Journal of Engineering and Engineering Technology, 16 (2022) 113-119.

DOI: 10.51459/futajeet.2022.16.1.420

Google Scholar

[5] O. Babatola, C. Arum, Determination of the Compressive Strength of Concrete from Binary Cement and Ternary Aggregates, Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 3 (2020) 10-21.

DOI: 10.4236/ojce.2020.104029

Google Scholar

[6] R.R. Bellum, R. Nerella, S.R.C. Madduru, C.S.R. Indukuri, Mix design and mechanical properties of fly ash and GGBFS-synthesized alkali-activated concrete (AAC), Infrastructures, 4 (2019) 20-29.

DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures4020020

Google Scholar

[7] T. Andrew, O.O. Omotayo, C. Arum, C.M. Ikumapayi, C. M. (2023). Effects of Sodium Carbonate Admixture and Mix Design Ratios on the Compressive Strength of Concrete, Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH), 42 (2019) 185 -190.

DOI: 10.4314/njt.v42i2.4

Google Scholar

[8] H. Bilal, M. Yaqub, S.K.U. Rehman, M. Abid, R. Alyousef, H. Alabduljabbar, F. Aslam, Performance of Foundry Sand Concrete under Ambient and Elevated Temperatures. Materials, 12 (2022) 2645-2656.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12162645

Google Scholar

[9] E.H. Chang, P. Sarker, N. Lloyd, B.V. Rangan, Bond behaviour of reinforced fly ash-based geopolymer concrete beams. In Proceedings of the 24th Biennial Conference of the Concrete Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia, (2019).

Google Scholar

[10] C.B Cheah, L.E. Tan, M. RaLPi, The engineering properties and microstructure of sodium carbonate activated fly ash/slag blended mortars with silica fume, Compos. Part. B Eng., 160 (2019) 558–572.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.056

Google Scholar

[11] M. Chi, R. Huang, Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars, Constr. Build. Mater. 40 (2013): 291–298.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.003

Google Scholar

[12] R.K. Chouhan, M. Mudgal, A. Bisarya, A.K. Srivastava, Rice-husk-based superplasticizer to increase performance of fly ash geopolymer concrete. Emerging Materials Research, 1 (2022) 6-15.

DOI: 10.1680/jemmr.18.00035

Google Scholar

[13] J. Davidovits, Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 37 (1991) 1633–1656.

Google Scholar

[14] J. Davidovits, High-alkali cements for 21st century concretes, Spec. Publ., 142 (1994)383-398.

Google Scholar

[15] J. Davidovits, Geopolymers: Inorganic Polymeric New Materials, Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37 (1991), 1633-1656.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01912193

Google Scholar

[16] F. Faluyi, C. Arum, C.M. Ikumapayi, S.A. Alabi, Review of the Compressive Strength Predictor Variables of Geopolymer Concrete. FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7 (2022a) 1-11.

DOI: 10.46792/fuoyejet.v7i3.884

Google Scholar

[17] F. Faluyi, C. Arum, C.M. Ikumapayi, S.A Alabi, Effects of partially replacing sand with laterite on compressive strength of hybrid OPC - activated metakaolin concrete, Dsia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 28 (2022b). 1-9.

Google Scholar

[18] F. Fan, Z. Liu, G. Xu, H. Peng, C. Cai, Mechanical and thermal properties of fly ash based geopolymers, Constr. Build. Mater., 160 (2018) s66–81.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.023

Google Scholar

[19] P.S. Deb, P.K. Sarker, Durability properties of geopolymer concrete with flyash and metakaolin. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 9 (2020) 256–260.

Google Scholar

[20] I. Handayani, S. Aprilia, A. Abdullah, C. Rahmawati, A.M. Mustafa, A. Al Bakri, I.H. Aziz, E.A. Azimi, Synthesis of Sodium Silicate from Rice Husk Ash as an Activator to Produce Epoxy, Geopolymer Cement, 1 (2021) 1-14.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1845/1/012072

Google Scholar

[21] A. Hassan, M. Arif, M. Shariq, Influence of microstructure of geopolymer concrete on its mechanical properties a review, Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials and Geotechnical Engineering, 1 (2020a) 119-129.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-7480-7_10

Google Scholar

[22] A. Hassan, M. Arif, M. Shariq, A review of properties and behaviour of reinforced geopolymer concrete structural elements—A clean technology option for sustainable development, J. Clean. Prod., 245 (2020b). 118-126.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118762

Google Scholar

[23] O.O. Omotayo, C. Arum, Challenges and Prospects of Widespread Adoption of Pozzolans for Building Construction: A Statistical Assessment, International Journal of Engineering, 35 (2022) 1929-1940.

DOI: 10.5829/ije.2022.35.10a.12

Google Scholar

[24] O.A. Oni, C. Arum, Workability and Compressive Strength of Concrete Containing Binary Cement, Mixed Fines, and Superplasticizer, Facta Universitatis Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 21 (2023) 299-314.

DOI: 10.2298/fuace220818017o

Google Scholar

[25] M. Otieno, M. Alexander, Chloride conductivity testing of concrete - Past and recent developments, Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 57 (2015) 55-64.

DOI: 10.17159/2309-8775/2015/v57n4a7

Google Scholar

[26] M. Koushkbaghi, P. Alipour, B. Tahmouresi, Influence of different monomer ratios and recycled concrete aggregate on mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer concretes, Construction and Building Materials, 205 (2019) 519-528.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.174

Google Scholar

[27] A. Gholampour, V.D Ho, T. Ozbakkaloglu, Ambient cured geopolymer mortars prepared with waste-based sands: mechanical and durability-related properties and microstructure. Composites Part B: Engineering 160 (2019a) 519-534.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.057

Google Scholar

[28] M.D. Obebe, C.M Ikumapayi, K.K. Alaneme, Structural performance evaluation of concrete mixes containing recycled concrete aggregate and calcined termite mound for low-cost housing, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 72 (2023) 237–346.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.03.095

Google Scholar

[29] O.O. Ogunsote, J.O. Afolayan, C. Arum, B. Prucnal-Ogunsote, Repurposing Architectural and Structural Engineering Education To Combat Catastrophic Structural Failure In Developing Countries: A Nigerian Case Study! Uia2014 Durban Architecture, 1 (2014) 767-785.

Google Scholar

[30] R.P. Venkatesan, K. Pazhani, K. (2016). Strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete made with ground granulated blast furnace slag and black rice husk ash. KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 20(2) 2384–2391.

DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-0564-0

Google Scholar

[31] Leiva, Y. Luna-Galiano, C. Arenas, A porous geopolymer based on aluminum-waste with acoustic properties, Waste Management, 95 (2019) 504-512.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.042

Google Scholar

[32] Silva, G.S. Kim, R. Aguilar, Natural fibers as reinforcement additives for geopolymer sea review of potential eco-friendly applications to the construction industry, Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 23 (2020) 1-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00132

Google Scholar

[33] Bellum, R.R. Nerella, Madduru, S.R.C. Indukuri, Mix design and mechanical properties of fly ash and GGBFS-synthesized alkali-activated concrete (AAC), Infrastructures, 4 (2019) 20-29.

DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures4020020

Google Scholar

[34] A. Özcan, M.B. Karakoç, The resistance of blast furnace slag-and ferrochrome slag-based geopolymer concrete against acid attack. Int. J. Civ. Eng., 17 (2019) 1571–1583.

DOI: 10.1007/s40999-019-00425-2

Google Scholar

[35] R.P Palcis, The Effect of Water Quality on Concrete Strength and Permeability: A Review of the Use of Chlorinated Water vs. Top Water in Concrete, Mix Design, 1 (2023) 2-10.

Google Scholar

[36] M. Koushkbaghi, P. Alipour, B. Tahmouresi, Influence of different monomer ratios and recycled concrete aggregate on mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer concretes, Construction and Building Materials, 205 (2019) 519-528.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.174

Google Scholar

[37] F. Matalkah, P. Soroushian, Graphene nanoplatelet for enhancement the mechanical properties and durability characteristics of alkali activated binder, Construction and Building Materials, 249 (2020) 11-24.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118773

Google Scholar

[38] R.Y. Nkwaju, J.N.Y Nobo, J.N.N. Fekoua, Iron-rich laterite-bagasse fibers based geopolymer composite: mechanical, durability and insulating properties, Applied Clay Science, 183 (2019) 10-17.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2019.105333

Google Scholar

[39] M. Sarkar, M. Maiti, S. Maiti, ZnO-SiO2 nanohybrid decorated sustainable geopolymer retaining antibiodeterioration activity with improved durability, Materials Science and Engineering: 92(2) 663-672.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.07.005

Google Scholar

[40] A.S. Kurtoglu, R. Alzeebaree, O. Aljumaili, A. Nis, M.E. Gulsan, G. Humur, G. A. Cevik, Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash and slag based geopolymer concrete, Adv. Concr. Constr. 6 (2018) 345-356.

Google Scholar

[41] ASTM C618-19, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2019).

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-22

Google Scholar

[42] ASTM C496/C496M-17, Standard Test. Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2017).

Google Scholar

[43] P. Cong, Y. Cheng, A comprehensive review, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Advances in geopolymer materials, 1 (2021) 1-12.

Google Scholar