Effect of ERNiCr-3 and ER70S-G Filler Metals on Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of TIG-Welded SS 409–Cu C11000 Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

Welding ferritic stainless steel to copper is well known to be challenging because of the large mismatch in their thermal conductivities and metallurgical behaviors. Dissimilar joints are required in a range of energy, automotive, and metallurgical applications. In this study, TIG welding of SS 409 to copper C11000 was performed using ERNiCr-3 (Ni-based) and ER70S-G (Mn-based) filler metals under controlled DCEN conditions to evaluate their mechanical and microstructural performance. Tensile testing, microhardness mapping, and microstructural observations using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed after the welding process. The results show that the joints welded with ERNiCr-3 exhibited a higher ultimate tensile strength, reaching approximately 220 MPa, along with an elongation of approximately 10%. In comparison, ER70S-G joints achieved a tensile strength of approximately 160 MPa and exhibited lower ductility, with an elongation of approximately 6%. A smoother hardness transition across the weld interface was observed for ERNiCr-3, whereas ER70S-G produced a more localized hardness peak close to the fusion boundary. SEM-EDS analysis indicated sound fusion for both filler metals, with limited formation of interfacial compounds. Based on these results, ERNiCr-3 remains the preferred filler when a higher mechanical performance is required. However, ER70S-G can be considered a practical and economical alternative to TIG-welded SS 409–Cu C11000 joints in applications where moderate strength is sufficient.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1195)

Pages:

33-39

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Roy et al., "Characterization of Metallurgical and Mechanical Properties of Commercially Pure Copper and AISI 304 Dissimilar Weldments," Procedia Materials Science, vol. 5, p.2503–2512, 2014.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.502

Google Scholar

[2] N. Thomas et al., "Microstructural and Mechanical Properties Evaluation of Tungsten Inert Gas-Welded 316 Stainless Steel and Pure Copper Joint," Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis, vol. 9, no. 5, p.678–684, Oct. 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/s13632-020-00682-x

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Zhang, J. Huang, H. Chi, N. Cheng, Z. Cheng, and S. Chen, "Study on welding-brazing of copper and stainless steel using tungsten/metal gas suspended arc welding," Mater Lett, vol. 156, p.7–9, Oct. 2015.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.04.128

Google Scholar

[4] B. Yelamasetti, G. Venkat Ramana, and T. Vishnu Vardhan, "Weldability and mechanical properties of AA5052 and AA7075 dissimilar joints developed by GTAW process," in Materials Today: Proceedings, Elsevier Ltd, 2021, p.4162–4166.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.446

Google Scholar

[5] A. T. Assefa et al., "Experimental Investigation and Parametric Optimization of the Tungsten Inert Gas Welding Process Parameters of Dissimilar Metals," Materials, vol. 15, no. 13, Jul. 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/ma15134426

Google Scholar

[6] S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003.

Google Scholar