Effect of Substrate Temperature on Crystal Orientation and Residual Stress in RF Sputtered Gallium Nitride Films

Abstract:

The crystal orientation and residual stress in gallium nitride (GaN) films deposited on a single-crystal (0001) sapphire substrate using a new sputtering system are examined through x-ray diffraction measurements as part of a study of low-temperature sputtering techniques for GaN. The new rf sputtering system has an isolated deposition chamber to prevent contamination with impurities, and is expected to produce high-purity nitride films. GaN films are deposited at various substrate temperatures and constant gas pressure and input power. This new system is found to produce GaN films with good crystal orientation, with the c-axes of GaN crystals oriented normal to the substrate surface. The crystal size of films deposited at high temperature is larger than that deposited at low Ts. All films except that deposited at 700oC exhibit compressive residual stress, and this residual stress is found to decrease with increasing temperature. Finally, the film deposited at 700 oC was tinged with white, and the surface contained numerous micro-cracks.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 490-491)
• Pages: 613-618
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.490-491.613
• Online since: July 2005
• Authors: Kazuya Kusaka, Hanabusa Takao, Kikuo Tominaga, Noriyoshi Yamauchi
• Keywords: Crystal Orientation, Gallium Nitride Film, Residual Stress, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

References

[1] S. Nakamura, T. Mukai and M. Senoh, Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 64 (1994), p.1687.

[2] S. Nakamura, M. Senoh, N. Iwasa and S. Nagahama, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 34 (1995), p. L797.

[3] S. Nakamura, M. Senoh, S. Nagahama, N. Iwasa, T. Yamada, T. Matsushita, H. Kiyohu and, Y. Sugimoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 35 (1996), p. L74.

DOI: 10.1143/jjap.35.l74

[4] S. Miyoshi, K. Onabe, N. Ohkouchi, H. Yaguchi and R. Ito, J. Crystal Growth, Vol. 124 (1992), p.432.

[5] Y. Kobayashi, F. Scholtz and N. Kobayashi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 36 (1997), p.2592.

[6] H. Sato, H. Takahashi, A. Watanabe and H. Ota, Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 68 (1996), p.3617.

[7] R. V. Stuart, G. K. Wehner and G. S. Anderson, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 40 (1969), p.803.

[8] T. Hanabusa, Mater. Sci. Res. Int., Vol. 5 (1999), p.63.

[9] H. P. Maruska and J. J. Tietjen, Appl. Phys. Lett., USA, Vol. 15 (1969), p.327.

[10] T. Detchprohm, K. Hiramatsu, K. Itoh and I. Akasaki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 31 (1992), p. L1454.

[11] E. Macherauch and P. Müller, Z. angew Phys., Vol. 13 (1961), p.305.

[12] V. A. Savastenko and A. U. Sheleg, Phys. Status Solidi A (Germany), Vol. 48 (1978), p. K135.

[13] U. Geyer, U. von Hülsen, H. Kopf, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 83 (1998), p.3065.

[14] D. W. Hoffman and J. A. Thornton, Thin Solid Films, Vol. 45 (1977), p.387.

[15] J. A. Thornton and D. W. Hoffman, J. Vac. Sci. & Tech., Vol. A3 (1985), p.576.

[16] G. Este, R. Surridge and W. D. Westwood, J. Vac. Sci. & Tech., Vol. A4 (1986), p.989.

[17] G. Este and W. D. Westwood, J. Vac. Sci. & Tech., Vol. A5 (1987), p. (1982).