Assessment of Materials for Fuselage Panels Considering Fatigue Behavior

Abstract:

Minimum-weight designs are frequently too costly to manufacture, whereas less expensive and easy to fabricate and assemble designs are often much heavier. The most efficient design on the basis of both cost and weight often lies between these two extremes. The current trend in structural materials selection consists of the extensive use of composite materials in the airframe. Composite materials have high specific strength, are less prone to fatigue crack initiation and provide enhanced flexibility for structural optimization compared to the aluminum alloys. On the other hand, aluminum alloys display higher toughness and better damage tolerance in the presence of defects. A simple methodology for the weight assessment based on the specific weight for different damage scenarios for an exemplary, simplified fuselage panel, will be presented, in order to quantify the savings under different conditions. The results show that the composites have advantages over the aluminum alloys, although due to low ductility, in parts that are exposed to external damages the aluminum alloys can have better performance due to the better damage tolerant properties.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 730-732)
• Pages: 265-270
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.730-732.265
• Online since: November 2012
• Authors: S.M.O. Tavares, Pedro P. Camanho, P.M.S.T. de Castro
• Keywords: Aircraft Materials, Aluminium Alloy, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer/Plastic (CFRP), Hybrid Material, Specific Fatigue Properties

References

[1] Martinez-Val, R. and Perez, E., Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 223, n. 12 (2009), 2767-2820.

DOI: 10.1243/09544062jmes1546

[2] B. Béral; Airbus Composites Technologies & Structures, presented at Colloque Composite; Toulouse, France; October 3, (2007).

[3] G. Tober and D. Schiller; NDT in Aerospace - State of Art,; 15th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, Rome, 15-21 October (2000).

[4] R.J.H. Wanhill, Milestone Case Histories in Aircraft Structural integrity, Technical Report NLR-TP-2002-521, Netherlands, (2002).

[5] B. Vermeulen and M. J. L. van Tooren; Materials and Design; vol. 27, n. 1, (2006) 10-20.

[6] H. Rosner and K. Jockel-Miranda; Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, vol. 37, (2006) 768-772.

[7] I. Bordesoules, J.C. Ehrstrom, T. Warner, P. Lequeu, and F. Eberl; Trends in developments of aluminum solutions for aerospace applications solutions applications,; Workshop WELAIR, GKSS, Geesthacht (Hamburg), Germany, 13 -15 June (2007).

[8] Zaki Ahmad; The properties and application of scandium-reinforced aluminum,; JOM Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, vol. 55, n. 2, (2003) 35-39.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-003-0224-6

[9] B. Domke; Boeing 787 Lessons Learnt,; Internal Presentation at Airbus; October, (2008).

[10] H. Baldwin; Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Unmatched Economics, Performance and Passenger Appeal, Aviation Week & Space Technology Market Supplement, March 14, (2005).

[11] A. Vlot; GLARE History of the Development of a New Aircraft Material, Kluwer, (2001).

[12] G. Norris, M. Kingsley-Jones, D. Learmount, and M. Phelan; Europe's giant: a special A380 supplement, Flight International Supplement 20-26, (2003).

[13] A. Pun; How to predict fatigue life - three methods of calculating total life, crack initiation, and crack growth,; Design News; December (2001).

[14] . C. Alderliesten R. Benedictus; Fiber/Metal composite technology for future primary aircraft structures,; 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; 23-26 April (2007).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-2404

[15] H. Tada, P. C. Paris, G. R. Irwin, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, ASME, (2000).

[16] H. A. Wood; Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 7 n. 3; (1975) 557-564.

[17] NASGRO - Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis Software v. 4. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA, (2003).

[18] C.S. Lopes Damage and failure of non-conventional composite laminates, PhD thesis, TU Delft, (2009).

[19] M.E. Waddoups, J.R. Eisenmann, and B.E. Kaminski; J. of Comp. Materials 5 (1971); 446-454.

[20] P.P. Camanho, P. Maimi, C.G. Dávila; Composites Science and Technology 67 (2007) 2715-2727.