Quality Improvement of Recycled Aggregates from a Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Pilot Plant

Abstract:

The construction and demolition wastes (C&DW) frequently are abandoned in private properties, roads, and landfills or collected by non-licensed companies. In Portugal they are few recycling plants operating with this residue, and this work makes the bridge between the mechanical recycling process developed on semi-industrial scale, and the recycling products characterization process developed on laboratorial scale. The main goal of the present work is the quality improvement of the recycled aggregates produced by a construction and demolition waste recycling pilot plant with 50 ton/h located in Montemor-o-Novo. Process operations are the hammer mill comminution, magnetic separation and sieving (bar sieves: 0-4mm, 4-8mm and 8-12mm; and square sieves: 12-22mm, 22-31mm and above 31mm). In order to improve the magnetic separation process, several tests with different distances between the magnet and the conveyor belt were made (21-31cm). On the other hand, to improve the quality of the produced aggregates, the bar screen size fractions were analyzed, according to the Portuguese Standard (NP EN 933-1 2000). The most efficient distances for the magnetic separation process were identified as between 21 and 27cm, with efficiency between 85% and 90% respectively. According to the histograms, the more frequent red aggregate from 0-4mm size fraction are +0.425-0.850; +0.850-1.7 and +1.7-3.35. From the 4-8mm red aggregates, the more frequent size fractions are +4.75-6.7 and +6.7-9.95. Finally, from the 8-12mm red aggregates, the more frequent new size fractions are +6.7-9.50 and +9.50-13.20. Sieving results obtained from cumulative curves for red aggregate showed an decrease in the mass % amount for the size fractions: 0-4mm: 97%, 4-8mm:76% and 8-12mm: 56%. The results from cumulative curves for grey aggregate showed a light decreased in the amount mass % for the size fractions: 0-4mm: 90%, 4-8mm:56% and 8-12mm: 60%.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 730-732)
• Pages: 630-635
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.730-732.630
• Online since: November 2012
• Authors: D. Algarvio, Maria Margarida Rolim Augusto Lima, M.L. Cunha
• Keywords: Construction Waste, Demolition Waste (CDW), Magnetic Separation, Recycled Aggregate (RA), Recycling

References

[1] G. Tchobanoglous and F. Kreith, Handbook of Solid Waste Management, McGraw Hill Handbooks, (2002), 11.

[2] J. Ruivo and J, Veiga, Resíduos de Construção e Demolição: Estratégia para um Modelo de Gestão, Environmental Engineering Graduation Thesis, IST, Lisbon, (2004), 43.

[3] C&D Wastes, WARMER BULLETIN – Journal for Sustainable Waste Management, 100 (2005).

[4] P. Malheiro, 70 por Cento dos Resíduos de Construção e Demolição sem Paradeiro, Água & Ambiente – O jornal de negócios do ambiente, 113 (2008), 4.

[5] A.C. Ferreira, Novo Decreto-Lei Valoriza Resíduos de Construção e Demolição, Água & Ambiente – O jornal de negócios do ambiente, 110 (2008), 22.

[6] M. Fonseca, Novos Pavimentos Nascem das Ruínas do Antigo Hotel Estoril-Sol, Água & Ambiente – O jornal de negócios do ambiente, 102 (2007), 18.

[7] P.T. Williams, Waste Treatment and Disposal, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. England, (2005), 113.

[8] D.J. Spottiswood and E.G. Kelly, Introduction to Mineral Processing, J.W& Sons, (1982), 177.

[9] Ch.F. Hendriks and H.S. Pietersen, ed., Sustainable Raw Materials – Construction and Demolition Waste, RILEM Publications S.A.R.L., (2000), 30, 47.

[10] M.J. Moroney, Dos Números aos Factos (Portuguese tradution, Edições Despertar, Porto, Facts from Figures, 2nd. Ed., Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England, (1969), 191.