Role of Sn on the Adhesion between Cu-Sn Alloy Coated Steel and SBR Based Rubber

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of Cu-Sn coating on steel towards improving the adhesion between steel and typical styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) based tyre bead composition has been investigated in this work. Steel coupons were coated with varying compositions of Cu-Sn via immersion coating, where the electrolyte bath composition was varied. Chemical analysis of the coatings using ICP-OES confirmed increase in Sn content with increasing SnSO4 concentration in the coating baths, keeping other parameters constant. No change in the coating weight was observed with change in Sn concentration in the coatings. Bare spots on the coating surface was observed under SEM XPS analysis confirmed formation of Fe oxide at the bare locations. The coated steel plates were vulcanized with SBR based rubber and peel strength was measured. The results confirmed an optimum Sn concentration of 3 - 4 wt% in the coatings up to which an increase (~ 25%) in adhesion strength was exhibited compared to only Cu coatings. Stereo-microscopic analysis of the peel tested samples validated mixed mode i.e. both adhesive and cohesive modes of failure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 783-786)

Pages:

1438-1443

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D.A. Stout and J. Rife, Surface analysis of the adhesive bond between various Cu, Sn, and Fe bronze alloys and rubber, J. Vac. Sci. & Tech. A, 8 (1990), 2407-2412.

DOI: 10.1116/1.576706

Google Scholar

[2] J.W. Cook, S. Edge and D.E. Packham, Bonding of Natural Rubber to Steel: Surface Roughness and Interlayer Structure, J. Adhesion, 72 (2000), 293-315.

DOI: 10.1080/00218460008029287

Google Scholar

[3] R.A. Friend, US Patent 4226918. (1980).

Google Scholar

[4] R.M. Shemenski, D.K. Kim and T.W. Starinshak, US Patent US4446198 (1984).

Google Scholar

[5] G. Haemers, US Patent 4347290 (1982).

Google Scholar

[6] S. Nakagawa, K. Kawasaki and M. Yoshikawa, US Patent JP1177390A (1989).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Hachisuka, US Patent 5389163 (1995).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Nakagawa, K. Kawasaki and M. Yoshikawa, US Patent JP1177390 (1989).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Ouchi, US Patent JP3008880 (1991).

Google Scholar

[10] J. Hwang and M. Lee, US Patent KR9401347 (1994).

Google Scholar

[11] H. Hiroshi and M. Shinichi, US Patent 5176957 (Nov 1990).

Google Scholar

[12] P.L. Cho, G.S. Jeon, S.K. Ryu and G. Seo, Adhesion Between Rubber Compound and Copper-Film-Plated Steel Cord, J. Adhesion, 70 (1999), 241-258.

DOI: 10.1080/00218469908009558

Google Scholar

[13] P.L. Cho, G. Seo, G. S. Jeon, S. K. Ryu, Adhesion Between Rubber Compounds and Copper-film-coated Steel Plates, J. Adhesion, 73 (2000), 43-63.

DOI: 10.1080/00218460008029296

Google Scholar

[14] H.K. Ping, S.W. Bao, W.J. Kui, L. Qin and F.J. Li, Metal Finishing, 1997, 54.

Google Scholar

[15] T. Fujii T, F.M.F. De Groot, G.A. Sawatzky, In situ XPS analysis of various iron oxide films grown by NO2-assisted molecular-beam epitaxy, Phy. Rev. B 59 (1999) 3195 – 3202.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.3195

Google Scholar

[16] M. Aronniemi, J. Lahtinen, J. Sainio, XPS study on the correlation between chemical state and oxygen-sensing properties of an iron oxide thin film, App. Surface Sci. 253 (2007) 9476-9482.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.06.007

Google Scholar