Controlled Release of Growth Factors from Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Made by Positive and Negative Voltage Electrospinning

Article Preview

Abstract:

Emulsion electrospun nanofibrous tissue engineering scaffolds made by conventional positive voltage electrospinning (PVES) have various advantages for growth factor (GF) delivery. But problems such as high initial burst release still exist. Negative voltage electrospinning (NVES) may produce nanofiberous scaffolds that can modulate the release behavior of GFs which bear positive electrical charges. By using either PVES or NVES for emulsion electrospinng, the present study investigated the influence of NVES and applied voltage on the release behavior of a typical GF bearing the positive charge, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), encapsulated in the nanofibers of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds. Emulsions were firstly prepared by mixing a bFGF-containing aqueous solution and a PLGA solution. They were then subjected to electrospinning under either a positive voltage (10, 15, or 20 kV) or a negative voltage (-10, -15, or-20 kV). The morphology and structure of fibers and scaffolds were subsequently characterized. All scaffolds were nanofibrous and the nanofibers exhibited core-shell structures, with the bFGF-containing water phase forming the fiber core. Scaffolds exhibited the same type of electrical charges as the type of the applied voltage for electrospinning, i.e., scaffold made by PVES showed positive charges while scaffold fabricated by NVES possessed negative charges. The intensity of positive or negative charges borne by scaffolds and their retention time on scaffolds increased with an increase in the absolute value of the applied voltage (⏐V⏐). In vitro bFGF release experiments were conducted for scaffolds made by either NVES or PVES. Results showed that the bFGF release behavior was modulated by NVES.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

385-389

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W.Y. Liu, S. Thomopoulos, Y.N. Xia, Electrospun nanofibers for regenerative medicine, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 1(2012) 10-25.

DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201290004

Google Scholar

[2] R.R. Chen, D.J. Mooney, Polymeric growth factor delivery strategies for tissue engineering, Pharm. Res. 20(2003), 1103-1112.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Sahoo, L.T. Ang, J.C.H. Goh, S.L. Toh, Growth factor delivery through electrospun nanofibers in scaffolds for tissue engineering applications, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 93A(2010), 1539-1550.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32645

Google Scholar

[4] C. Wang, M. Wang, Dual-source dual-power electrospinning and characteristics of multifunctional scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 23(2012), 2381-2397.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-012-4669-4

Google Scholar

[5] H.W. Tong, M. Wang, Electrospinning of fibrous polymer scaffolds using positive voltage or negative voltage: a comparative study, Biomed. Mater. 5(2010), 054110.

DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/5/054110

Google Scholar

[6] H.W. Tong, M. Wang, Negative voltage electrospinning and positive voltage electrospinning of tissue engineering scaffolds: a comparative study and charge retention on scaffolds, Nano LIFE. 2(2012), 1250004.

DOI: 10.1142/s1793984411000384

Google Scholar

[7] S.I. Zittermann, A.C. Issekutz, Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2) potentiates leukocyte recruitment to inflammation by enhancing endothelial adhesion molecule expression, Am. J. Pathol. 168(2006), 835-846.

DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050479

Google Scholar