Revealing the Individual Hardening Effects of Twins, Dislocations, Grain Boundaries and Solid Solution in a Twinning-Induced Plasticity Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Manganese-rich austenitic twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) steels with high strength and superior ductility have received much attention in the past two decades. Tremendous efforts have been made to explore their unusual hardening behaviour which includes contributions from twins, dislocations, grain boundaries and solid solution. Nevertheless, the individual hardening effects of twins, dislocations, grain boundaries and solid solution on the high strength of TWIP steels are still unclear. In the present work, the flow stress of a TWIP steel was experimentally decomposed into the respective contributions of twins, dislocations, grain boundaries and solid solution. For the forest hardening, synchrotron X-ray diffraction experiments with line profile analysis were carried out to measure the dislocation density. It is found that the yield stress of the present TWIP steel is controlled by solid solution and grain boundary hardening, which contribute to 238.3 and 238.5 MPa, respectively. After yielding, the work-hardening rate is dominated by dislocation multiplication which accounts for up to 922 MPa at a true strain of 0.4, equal to about 60% of the flow stress. In comparison, twins contribute to only 118 MPa at the same true strain, equal to about 8% of the flow stress. In other words, twins have minor effect on the flow stress, in contrast to the current understandings in the literature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2489-2494

Citation:

Online since:

November 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Remy, Acta Metallurgica, 26 (1978) 443-451.

Google Scholar

[2] O. Bouaziz, S. Allain, C. Scott, Scripta Materialia, 58 (2008) 484-487.

Google Scholar

[3] D.R. Steinmetz, T. Jäpel, B. Wietbrock, P. Eisenlohr, I. Gutierrez-Urrutia, A. Saeed–Akbari, T. Hickel, F. Roters, D. Raabe, Acta Materialia, 61 (2013) 494-510.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.064

Google Scholar

[4] C.P. Scott, B. Remy, J.L. Collet, A. Cael, C. Bao, F. Danoix, B. Malard, C. Curfs, Precipitation strengthening in high manganese austenitic TWIP steels, Hanser, Munich, ALLEMAGNE, (2011).

DOI: 10.3139/146.110508

Google Scholar

[5] G. Dini, R. Ueji, A. Najafizadeh, S.M. Monir-Vaghefi, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 527 (2010) 2759-2763.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.033

Google Scholar

[6] O. Bouaziz, H. Zurob, B. Chehab, J.D. embury, S. Allain, M. Huang, Materials Science and Technology, 27 (2011) 707-709.

DOI: 10.1179/026708309x12535382371852

Google Scholar

[7] B.C. De Cooman, O. Kwon, K.G. Chin, Materials Science and Technology, 28 (2012) 513-527.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Ribárik, T. Ungár, J. Gubicza, Journal of applied crystallography, 34 (2001) 669-676.

Google Scholar