Numerical Study of the Crack-Front Constraint for SENT Specimens of X80 Pipeline Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work presents a numerical study of crack-front constraint for SENT specimens of X80 pipeline steel, to examine geometry effect on the correlation of crack-front stress field and constraint. An average measure of constraint over crack-front Am was employed to characterize the crack-front constraint. SENT specimens with varying geometries (different crack depth to specimen width ratio, a/W, and different specimen width and thickness, W/B) were analyzed by Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model (GTN model). Results showed that the stress triaxiality Am can characterize the crack-front constraint of X80 pipeline steel very well. The level of the Am-△a curve rises with the decrease of crack depth, and increases first and then decreases with the increase of SENT specimen thickness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

735-740

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.H. Pan. Development prospects of China's natural gas industry transmission pipeline engineering, J. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation. 24-6 (2005) 1-3.

Google Scholar

[2] K.J. Han, J Shuai, X.M. Deng, et al. The effect of constraint on CTOD fracture toughness of API X65 steel, Engineering Fracture Mechanics. (2014) 167-181.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.04.014

Google Scholar

[3] Rice J R & Tracey D M. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 17. (1969) 201-207.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7

Google Scholar

[4] A.L. Gurson, Plastic flow and fracture behavior of ductile materials incorporating void nucleation, growth and coalescence, PhD dissertation, Brown University, (1975).

Google Scholar

[5] V. Tvergaard, On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids, Int. J. Fract. 18(1982) 237-252.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00015686

Google Scholar

[6] ABAQUS Analysis User's Guide, v6. 13, SIMULIA.

Google Scholar

[7] Cravero S, Bravo R E and Ernst H A. Constraint evaluation and effects on J-R resistance curves for Pipes under combined load conditions. Proceedings of the Eighteenth (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] Xia L, Shih C F and Hutchinson J W. A computational approach to ductile crack growth under large scale yielding conditions. J Mech Phys Solids. 43(1995) 389-413.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(94)00069-h

Google Scholar

[9] Brocks, W. Quantitative Assessment of the Role of Crack Tip Constraint on Ductile Tearing in Constraint Effects in Fracture. In: Hackett, etc., Eds. ASTM STP 1171, March, (1993).

DOI: 10.1520/stp18023s

Google Scholar