Deformation Behaviors and Constitutive Model of DP1000 under Different Strain Rates

Article Preview

Abstract:

The DP1000 cold-rolled dual phase steel, the thickness of which is 1.2 mm, was required to do the tensile test under nine different strain rates from 10-4 s-1 to 1000 s-1. The mechanical properties and morphologies of the steel were obtained and analyzed. According to the C-J model, the plastic deformation characteristics of dual phase steel under different strain rates were studied. By means of transmission electron microscope (TEM), the morphologies of ferrite and martensite in the dynamic were observed. Finally, the constitutive models of quasi-static and high strain rate were established by using the modified Johnson-Cook model. The results reveal that DP1000 dual phase steel has obvious strain rate sensitivity, and it is a relatively pure ferrite and martensite dual phase structure. There are two stage strain hardenging characteristics in DP1000. In the first stage, the strain hardening ability of ferrite is higher, and the second stage is martensite deformation stage, the strain hardening ability is lower. The modified J-C constitutive model has high fitting effect, and the experimental results are matched with the fitting values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

810-817

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Oliver, T.B. Jones, G. Fourlaris. Dual phase versus TRIP strip steels: Microstructural changes as a consequence of quasi-stastic and dymic tensile testing[J]. Materials Charaterization, 2007, (58): 390~400.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.07.004

Google Scholar

[2] Jiecen Zhang, Hongshuang Di, Yonggang Deng. Effect of martensite morphology and volume fraction on strain hardening and fracture behavior of martensite-ferrite dual phase steel[J]. Materials Sci Eng A, 2015, (627): 230~240.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.006

Google Scholar

[3] Yu Cao, Birger Karsson, Johan Ahlstrom. Temperature and strain rate effects on the mechanical behavior of dual phase steel[J]. Materials Sci Eng A, 2015, (636): 124~132.

Google Scholar

[4] J.H. Kim, J.H. Sung, K. Piao. The shear fractue of dual-phase steel[J]. Internation Journal of Plasticity, 2011, 27(10): 1658~1675.

Google Scholar

[5] Ding Ni Zhang, Qian Shangguan. A modified Johnson–Cook model of dynamic tensile behaviors for 7075-T6 aluminum alloy[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2015, 15(619): 186~194.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.002

Google Scholar

[6] Xiangyu Wang, Chuanzhen Huang. Dynamic behavior and a modified Johnson–Cook constitutive model of Inconel 718 at high strain rate and elevated temperature[J]. Materials Science. and Engineering: A, 2013, 15(580): 385~390.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.05.062

Google Scholar