Zirconia Dental Implant Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ceramic materials are used for the fabrication of dental restorations respectively esthetic dentistry. The main ceramic materials are glass ceramics, spinel, alumina and zirconia. Zirconia was introduced into dentistry domain in the 1990s used like frameworks, implants, dowels, abutments and orthodontic brackets. Recently, zirconia materials are getting much attention for dental implants because of its toothlike color, mechanical properties, good corrosion and biocompatibility. This article presents an review of zirconia dental implants osseointegration and mechanical strength compared with other dental implants. Clinical studies published indicate that zirconia dental implants have the potential to become alternative of titanium dental implants used in medical applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

99-103

Citation:

Online since:

September 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Andreiotelli, H.J. Wenz, R.J. Kohal, Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review, Clin Oral Implants Res. 20 (2009) 32-47.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01785.x

Google Scholar

[2] Q. Chen, GA. Thouas, Metallic implant biomaterials, Mater Sci Eng R Reports. 87 (2015) 1-57.

Google Scholar

[3] M.S. Bălţatu, P. Vizureanu, M.H. Ţierean, M.G. Minciună, D.C. Achiţei, Ti-Mo Alloys Used in Medical Applications, Adv Mater Res. 1128 (2005) 105-111.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1128.105

Google Scholar

[4] B. Istrate, C. Munteanu, M. Matei, B. Oprisan, D. Chicet, K. Earar, Influence of ZrO2 -Y2 O3 and ZrO2 -CaO coatings on microstructural and mechanical properties on Mg-1, 3Ca- 5, 5Zr biodegradable alloy, IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 133 (2016).

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/133/1/012010

Google Scholar

[5] M.G. Minciuna, P. Vizureanu, D.C. Achitei, N. Ghiban, A.V. Sandu, N.C. Forna, Structural Characterization of Some CoCrMo Alloys with Medical Applications, Rev. Chim. 3 (2014) 335-338.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Osman, M. Swain, A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia, Materials (Basel). 8 (2015) 932-958.

DOI: 10.3390/ma8030932

Google Scholar

[7] A.T. Sidambe, Biocompatibility of advanced manufactured titanium implants-A review, Materials (Basel). 7 (2014) 8168-8188.

DOI: 10.3390/ma7128168

Google Scholar

[8] M. Niinomi, Biologically and Mechanically Biocompatible Titanium Alloys, Mater Trans. 49 (2008) 2170-2178.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.l-mra2008828

Google Scholar

[9] S.O. Koutayas, Zirconia in Dentistry, Eur. J. Esthet Dent. 4 (2009) 348-380.

Google Scholar

[10] Z. Ozkurt, E. Kazazoglu, Zirconia Dental Implants, Journal of Oral Implantology. Vol. 37 (2011) 367-376.

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /www. azom. com - Zirconia - Physical and Mechanical Property Comparison of the Different Types of Zirconias.

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http: /www. ceraroot. com.

Google Scholar

[13] R.J. Kohal, W. Att, M. Bächle, F. Butz, Ceramic abutments and ceramic oral implants. An update. Periodontol. 47 (2008) 224–243.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00243.x

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Akagawa, Y. Ichikawa, H. Nikai, H. Tsuru, Interface histology of unloaded and early loadedpartially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J. Prosthet. Dent. 69 (1993) 599–604.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90289-z

Google Scholar

[15] J. Chevalier, L. Gremillard, Zirconia as a Biomaterial, Comprehensive Biomaterials II. 1 (2017) 122-144.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.10245-0

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Akagawa, R. Hosok, Y. Sato, K. Kamayama, Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years function in monkeys: A clinical and histologic study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 80 (1998) 551–558.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70031-9

Google Scholar

[17] A. Scarano, F. Di Carlo, M. Quaranta, A. Piattelli, Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J. Oral Implantol. 29 (2003) 8–12.

DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0008:brtzci>2.3.co;2

Google Scholar

[18] R. Depprich, H. Zipprich, M. Ommerborn, E. Mahn, L. Lammers, J. Handschel, C. Naujoks, H.P. Wiesmann, N.R. Kübler, U. Meyer, Osseointegration of zirconia implants: An SEM observation of the bone-implant interface. Head Face Med. 6 (2008) 4–25.

DOI: 10.1186/1746-160x-4-25

Google Scholar

[19] S. Schultze-Mosgau, H. Schliephake, M. Radespiel-Troger, F.W. Neukam, Osseointegration ofendodontic endosseous cones: Zirconium oxide vs. titanium. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 89 (2000) 91–98.

DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(00)80022-0

Google Scholar

[20] M. Bächle, F. Butz, U. Hübner, E. Bakalinis, R.J. Kohal, Behavior of CAL72 osteoblast-likecells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 18 (2007) 53–59.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01292.x

Google Scholar

[21] S.A.E. G Ossama, H.S. Ashraf, Zirconia based ceramics, some clinical and biological aspects: Review, Future Dental Journal. 2 (2016) 55-64.

Google Scholar