CBED and EELS Measurements of Post-Irradiated Aluminum Specimen Thickness

Article Preview

Abstract:

CBED and EELS are most common methods to determine the thickness of the TEM specimen. In this work, specimen thickness of He-ion irradiated Al is measured respectively by CBED and EELS under 200kV. The helium concentration and the atomic displacement damage level are 2000appm and 0.2dpa, respectively. The CBED results show that the measurements of extinction distance match the calculations of effective extinction distance considering the deviation vector of the crystal. Moreover, it is proven by modeling analysis that He-ion irradiation does not affect the thickness measurements of extinction distance. Compared with CBED, the specimen thickness, measured by EELS, is larger, and may be attributed to the decrease of the zero-loss peak due to a part of elastic scattering electronsloss and the larger inelastic scattering mean free path selected. The EELS measurement error is less than 20%,consistent with the accuracy (about 20%) byK. Iakoubovskiiet al.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

636-641

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Delille D, Pantel R, Cappellen E V. Crystal thickness and extinction distance determination using energy filtered CBED pattern intensity measurement and dynamical diffraction theory fitting[J]. Ultramicroscopy, 87(1-2) (2001) 5.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(00)00067-x

Google Scholar

[2] Iakoubovskii K, Mitsuishi K, Nakayama Y, et al. Thickness measurements with electron energy loss spectroscopy[J]. Microscopy Research & Technique, 71(8) (2008) 626-631.

DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20597

Google Scholar

[3] Malis T, Cheng S C, Egerton R F. EELS log-ratio technique for specimen-thickness measurement in the TEM[J]. Microscopy Research & Technique, 8(2) (1988) 193-200.

DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1060080206

Google Scholar

[4] Egerton R F. Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in Electron Microscopy[M]. Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope. (2011) 293-397.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9583-4_5

Google Scholar

[5] Iakoubovskii K, Mitsuishi K, Nakayama Y, et al. Mean free path of inelastic scattering in elemental solids and oxides using transmission electron microscopy: Atomic number dependent oscillatory behavior. Phys. Rev. B 71, 626-631[J]. Physical Review B Condensed Matter, 77(10) (2008).

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.77.104102

Google Scholar