Residual Stress Analysis of A362 Aluminum Alloy Gear Case Using Neutron Diffraction

Abstract:

Mercury Marine has used a new alloy, Mercalloy A362, for the manufacturing of a re-designed lower unit transmission gearcase. The enhanced strength of the alloy allowed for a substantial weight reduction in the new design. The purpose of this study was to examine and determine why cracking may develop in the gear casing during in service testing. Two types of material states, (i) as cast and (ii) heat treated were compared. Metallography and neutron diffraction analysis was carried out at locations identified as being areas of high stress by Magma software – which was performed in a separate study. Microstructural characterization at these locations revealed microstructural and the compositional differences. Differences in the porosity, eutectic phase, and volume fraction of the precipitates were observed at various locations of interest in each material state. The residual stress analysis was performed with application of neutron diffraction and revealed that the stresses in the as-cast component reached a maximum value of 120 MPa, which is below the yield strength of the alloy. The heat treatment applied to the castings reduced the stress by approximately 50 MPa. Based on the microstructure and neutron diffraction results, it is likely that performing a heat treatment process extends the lifetime of the component, however, it may not completely eliminate the cracking problem. Farther studies are currently nearing completion, targeting the mass production of the redesigned gearcase.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 941)
• Pages: 1288-1294
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.941.1288
• Online since: December 2018
• Authors: Dimitry Sediako*, Joshua Stroh, Alexandra McDougall, Ermia Aghaie
• Keywords: A362, Aluminium, Light Weighting, Marine Alloys, Mercalloy, Neutron Diffraction, Residual Stress

References

[1] ASTM, E3-11 Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens 1, ASTM Copyright., vol. i, no. Reapproved, p.1–12, (2011).

[2] ASTM, E407-07 Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys, ASTM Copyright., vol. 07, no. Reapproved 2015, p.1–22, (2016).

[3] K. Kasaba, T. Sano, S. Kudo, T. Shoji, K. Katagiri, and T. Sato, Fatigue crack growth under compressive loading, J. Nucl. Mater., vol. 258–263, p.2059–2063, Oct. (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(98)00343-2

[4] T. Holden, Neutron Diffraction, in Practical residual stress measurement methods, 2013, p.155–233.

[5] D. Sediako et al., Analysis of Residual Stress Profiles in the Cylinder Web Region of an As-Cast V6 Al Engine Block with Cast-In Fe Liners Using Neutron Diffraction, SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp.2011-0036, Apr. (2011).

DOI: 10.4271/2011-01-0036

[6] Technical Standard, ISO/TS 21432:2005 (E), Non-Destructive Testing - Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses By Neutron Diffraction. International Organization for Standardization, (2005).

DOI: 10.3403/30105724u

[7] F. D'elia, C. Ravindran, and D. Sediako, Interplay among solidification, microstructure, residual strain and hot tearing in B206 aluminum alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 624, p.169–180, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.11.057

[8] K. Bangyikhan, Effects of Oxide film, Fe-rich phase, Porosity and their Interactions on Tensile Properties of Cast Al-Si-Mg Alloys, (2005).

[9] R. Robles-hernandez, Francisco C, Jose Martin Herrera Ramírez, Al-Si Alloys, Automotive, Aeronautical, and Aerospace Applications. Springer International, (2017).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58380-8_10

[10] E. Vandersluis and C. Ravindran, Comparison of Measurement Methods for Secondary Dendrite Arm Spacing, Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal., vol. 6, no. 1, p.89–94, Feb. (2017).

DOI: 10.1007/s13632-016-0331-8

[11] R. Władysiak, A. Kozuń, K. Dębowska, and T. Pacyniak, Analysis of Crystallization Process of Intensive Cooled AlSi20CuNiCoMg Alloy, Arch. Foundry Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, Jan. (2017).

DOI: 10.1515/afe-2017-0065