Effect of Natural Aging on Mechanical Response of the Artificially Aged EN AW 6063 Aluminium Alloy

Abstract:

The effect of natural pre-aging time (from 0.1 to 10000 h) on mechanical response during subsequent artificial aging of EN AW 6063 aluminium alloy at 170°C was investigated using Vickers microhardness measurements, tensile test analysis and transmission electron microscopy characterization. The microhardness and tensile strength of EN AW 6063 alloy increased slightly with natural aging time. Afterward, the artificial ageing from 18 to 20 hours induced the maximum increasing of hardness and strength for variously naturally pre-aged states of alloy. But, it was found that when pre-aging time was prolonged from 0.1 h to 10000 h, the mechanical response of artificial aging applied for the pre-aged alloy states was slightly improved. It was suggested, that as pre-aging time was increased, the size of β'-phase particles formed in solid solution of pre-aged alloy state during artificial aging was decreased and their amount was increased.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 952)
• Pages: 74-81
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.952.74
• Online since: April 2019
• Authors: Martin Fujda*, Miloš Matvija, Miroslav Glogovský
• Keywords: AlMgSi Alloy, Artificial Aging, Mechanical Properties, Microstructure, Natural Aging

References

[1] I. Polmear, Light Alloys: From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystal, fourth ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, (2006).

[2] C.D. Marioara, S.J. Andersen, J. Jansen, H.W. Zandbergen, Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 789-796.

[3] A. Cuniberti, A. Tolley, M.V.C. Riglos, R. Giovachini, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 (2010) 5307-5311.

[4] Jia, L. Ding, L. Cao, R. Sanders, S. Li, Q. Liu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48 (2017) 459-473.

[5] J. Røyset, T. Stene, J.A. Sæter, O. Reiso, Mater. Sci. Forum 519-521 (2006) 239-244.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.519-521.239

[6] F.A. Martinsen, F.J.H. Ehlers, M.Torsæter, R. Holmestad, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 6091-6101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.047

[7] A. Poznak, V. Thole, P. Sanders, Metals-Basel 8 (2018) 309.

[8] R.C. Dorward, Metall. Trans. 4 (1973) 507-512.

[9] A. Vazdirvanidis, G. Pantazopoulos, A. Toulfatzis, A. Rikos, D. Manolakos, Mater. Sci. Forum 877 (2017) 315-321.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.877.315

[10] C.S.T. Chang, I. Wieler, N. Wanderka and J. Banhart, Ultramicroscopy 109 (2009) 585-592.

[11] M. Torsæter, W. Lefebvre, S.J. Andersen, C.D. Marioara, J.C. Walmsley, R. Holmestad, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys, Yokohama, Japan, September 5 – 9, (2010) 1385-1390.

[12] S.N. Kim, J.H. Kim, H. Tezuka, E. Kobayashi, T. Sato, Mater. Trans. 54 (2013) 297- 303.

[13] Y. Aruga, M. Kozuka, Y. Takaki, T. Sato, Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 631 (2015) 86-96.

[14] A. Serizawa, S. Hirosawa, T. Sato, Mater. Sci. Forum 519-521 (2006) 245-250.

[15] Y. Takaki, Y. Aruga, M. Kozuka, T. Sato, Mater. Sci. Forum 794-796 (2014) 1026-1031.

[16] Y. Birol, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 173 (2006) 84-91.

[17] J. Banhart, C.S.T. Chang, Z. Liang, N. Wanderka, M.D.H. Lay, A.J. Hill, Adv. Eng. Mater. 12 (2010) 559-571.

DOI: 10.1002/adem.201000041

[18] J.M. Robinson, Int. Mater. Rev. 39 (1994) 217-227.

[19] M. Fujda, M. Matvija, M. Glogovský, I. Orišenko, Manuf. Technol. 17 (2017) 706-710.

[20] C.S. Tsao, C.Y. Chen, U.S. Jeng, T.Y. Kuo, Acta Mater. 54 (2006) 4621-4632.