Pitting Corrosion Failure Analysis of a Produced Oil/Water Fluid Pipeline

Abstract:

This paper presents corrosion failure analysis of an underground natural gas pipeline. The pipeline material grade is 20# steel. The pipeline transfers multiphase fluid (Crude oil and water) from an oil well to an oil gathering plant. A portion of the line failed due to pitting corrosion under unknown circumstances. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are employed to characterize the scales and/or corrosion products near the failed portion. Based on visual and microscopic analyses and reviewing the background information, the following pitting corrosion sequences were identified: When the water ratio was smaller than 50%, the oil slick could cover the surface of the 20# test samples. Some uncovered surface would be corroded. When the water ratio was more than 70%, the surface of 20# steel contacted with more water. The average corrosion rate increased, and the corrosion products also formed, which would behave as a good diffusion barrier to prevent the underlying steel from further dissolution. Meanwhile, because of the corrosion products, the penetration rate also increased, the trend of local corrosion became weak with the water ratio continued to increase. The pitting corrosion varied with the water ratio because of the protection conferred by the oil slick or the corrosion product layer. Under such conditions, pits emerged on the steel surface until one of them grew faster and failed the oil pipeline.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 953)
• Pages: 39-44
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.953.39
• Online since: May 2019
• Authors: Yun Ma*, Zi Long Guo, Jiu Chun Qiao, Hai Tao Bai
• Keywords: 20# Carbon Steel, Corrosion Product, Pipeline, Pitting Corrosion

References

[1] H. Mansoori, D. Mowla, A. Mohammadi, Natural gas hydrate deposits—an unconventional energy resource, J. Explor. Prod. Oil Gas 1 (2012) 33–38.

[2] A. Kahyarian, M. Singer, S. Nesic, Modeling of uniform CO2 corrosion of mild steel in gas transportation systems: a review, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 29 (2016)530–549.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.052

[3] M.B. Kermani, D. Harrop, The impact of corrosion on oil and gas industry, SPE Prod. Facil. 11 (03) (1996) 186–190.

DOI: 10.2118/29784-pa

[4] R.R. Fessler, Pipeline corrosion, U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety, Report DTRS56-02-D-70036, (2008).

[5] H. Mansoori, D. Mowla, F. Esmaeelzadeh, A.H. Mohammadi, Case study: production benefits from increasing C-values, Oil Gas J. 111 (6) (2013) 64–69.

[6] S. Papavinasam, R.W. Revie, W.I. Friesen, A. Doiron, T. Panneerselvan, Review of models to predict internal pitting corrosion of oil and gas pipelines, Corros.Rev. 24 (2011) 173–230.

DOI: 10.1515/corrrev.2006.24.3-4.173

[7] S.N. Esmaeely, W. Zhang, B. Brown, M. Singer, S. Nešić, Localized corrosion of mild steel in marginally sour environments, Corrosion (2017) 1098–1106.

DOI: 10.5006/2422

[8] S. Papavinasam, A. Doiron, R.W. Revie, Effect of surface layers on the initiation of internal pitting corrosion in oil and gas pipelines, Corrosion 65 (2009) 663–673.

DOI: 10.5006/1.3319093

[9] J.C. Velázquez, F. Caleyo, A. Valor, J.M. Hallen, Predictive model for pitting corrosion in buried oil and gas pipelines, Corrosion 65 (2009) 332–342.

DOI: 10.5006/1.3319138

[10] A. Valor, F. Caleyo, J.M. Hallen, J.C. Velázquez, Reliability assessment of buried pipelines based on different corrosion rate models, Corros. Sci. 66 (2013)78–87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.005

[11] J.C. Velázquez, J.A.M. Van Der Weide, E. Hernández, H.H. Hernández, Statistical modelling of pitting corrosion: extrapolation of the maximum pit depth-growth, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 9 (2014) 4129–4143.

[12] M.A.L. Hernández-Rodríguez, D. Martínez-Delgado, R. González, et.al. Corrosive wear failure analysis in a natural gas pipeline, Wear 263 (2007) 567–571.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.123

[13] Farelas F.; Choi Y.S.; Nesic S. Corrosion behavior of deep water oil production tubing material under supercritical CO2 environment: Part 2-effect of crude oil and flow. Corros. Sci. 70 (2013)137-145.

DOI: 10.5006/1020

[14] Choi Y.S.; Farelas F.; Neši S.; Magalhães A.A.O.; Andrade C.D.A. Corrosion behavior of deep water oil production tubing material under supercritical CO2 environment: Part 1-effect of pressure and temperature. Corros. Sci.77(2013) 38-47.

DOI: 10.5006/1019