Finite Element Modelling and Multi-Objective Optimization of Composite Submarine Pressure Hull Subjected to Hydrostatic Pressure

Article Preview

Abstract:

Excellent mechanical behavior and low density of composite materials make them candidates to replace metals for many underwater applications. This paper presents a comprehensive study about the multi-objective optimization of composite pressure hull subjected to hydrostatic pressure to minimize the weight of the pressure hull and maximize the buckling load capacity according to the design requirements. Two models were constructed, one model constructed from Carbon/Epoxy composite (USN-150), the other model is metallic pressure hull constructed from HY100. The analysis and the optimization process were completely performed using ANSYS Parametric Design Language (APDL). Tsai-Wu failure criterion was incorporated in the optimization process. The results obtained emphasize that, the submarine constructed from Carbon/Epoxy composite (USN-150) is better than the submarine constructed from HY100. Finally, an optimized model with an optimum pattern of fiber orientations was presented. Hopefully, the results may provide a valuable insight for the future of designing composite underwater vehicles.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

53-58

Citation:

Online since:

May 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Zhang, M. Zhang, W. Tang, W. Wang, and M. Wang, Buckling of spherical shells subjected to external pressure: A comparison of experimental and theoretical data,, Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 111, pp.58-64, 2017/02/01/ (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.11.012

Google Scholar

[2] M. Zhang, W. Tang, F. Wang, J. Zhang, W. Cui, and Y. Chen, Buckling of bi-segment spherical shells under hydrostatic external pressure,, Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 120, pp.1-8, 2017/11/01/ (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.08.017

Google Scholar

[3] E. Fathallah, H. Qi, L. Tong, and M. Helal, Multi-Objective Optimization of Composite Elliptical Submersible Pressure Hull for Minimize the Buoyancy Factor and Maximize Buckling Load Capacity,, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 578, pp.75-82, (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.578-579.75

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Zhu, Q. Ma, J. Zhang, W. Tang, and Y. Dai, Opening reinforcement design and buckling of spherical shell subjected to external pressure,, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 158, pp.29-36, 2017/12/01/ (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.10.006

Google Scholar

[5] C. T. F. Ross and A. P. F. Little, The Buckling of a Corrugated Carbon Fibre Cylinder Under External Hydrostatic Pressure,, Ocean Engineering vol. 28, pp.1247-1264, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(00)00039-1

Google Scholar

[6] M. J. Smith, T. Macadam, and J. R. MacKay, Integrated modelling, design and analysis of submarine structures,, Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 10, pp.349-366, (2015).

DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2014.937058

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Sekulski, Multi-objective topology and size optimization of high-speed vehicle-passenger catamaran structure by genetic algorithm,, Marine Structures, vol. 23, pp.405-433, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.10.001

Google Scholar

[8] J. R. MacKay, M. J. Smith, F. van Keulen, T. N. Bosman, and N. G. Pegg, Experimental investigation of the strength and stability of submarine pressure hulls with and without artificial corrosion damage,, Marine Structures, vol. 23, pp.339-359, 2010/07/01/ (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.06.001

Google Scholar

[9] M. Aydogdu and T. Aksencer, Buckling of cross-ply composite plates with linearly varying In-plane loads,, Composite Structures, vol. 183, pp.221-231, 2018/01/01/ (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.085

Google Scholar

[10] J. Zhang, M. Wang, W. Wang, W. Tang, and Y. Zhu, Investigation on egg-shaped pressure hulls,, Marine Structures, vol. 52, pp.50-66, 2017/03/01/ (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.11.005

Google Scholar

[11] J. Y. Han, H. Y. Jung, J. R. Cho, J. H. Choi, and W. B. Bae, Buckling analysis and test of composite shells under hydrostatic pressure,, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 201, pp.742-745, 2008/05/26/ (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.228

Google Scholar

[12] J. R. Vinson and R. L, The Behavior Of Structures Composed Of Composite Materials: Springer, Dordrecht, (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] A. K. Kaw, Mechanics of Composite Materials, Second Edition ed.: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] P. D. Soden, M. J. Hinton, and A. S. Kaddour, A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates,, Composites Science and Technology, vol. 58, pp.1225-1254, 1998/07/01/ (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(98)00077-3

Google Scholar

[15] J. Arora, Introduction to Optimum Design vol. 4th Edition: Elsevier (2016).

Google Scholar