Study on Application Performance of Instrument Valve Body Formed by Selective Laser Melting for Nuclear Power Plant

Article Preview

Abstract:

A 316L stainless steel instrument valve body which with complex internal flow passage and used for primary loop flow measurement in pressurized power plant along with test specimen were printed by selective laser melting. The optical metallography of specimen showed the microstructure transform to be uniform after heat treatment state. The residual stress test was tested on three different position on the valve body after heat treatment. The results showed that the valve body mainly had a surface residual compressive stress, and the max main stress was in a range of-367.27MPa to 34.97MPa which get higher along the building direction. Then the application performance of intergranular corrosion test and hydraulic test on the valve body showed a good performance and the result could meet the acceptance requirements of the construction rule.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

64-71

Citation:

Online since:

June 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Saeidi, X. Gao, F. Lofaj, L. Kvetková, Z.J. Shen, Transformation of austenite to duplex austenite-ferrite assembly in annealed stainless steel 316L consolidated by laser melting. J. Alloys Comp., 633 (2015), 463-469.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.249

Google Scholar

[2] D. Herzog, V. Seyda, E. Wycisk, C. Emmelmann, Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater. 117 (2016) 371-392.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019

Google Scholar

[3] D. Gu, W. Meiners, K. Wissenbach, R. Poprawe, Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. International materials reviews. 57(3) (2012)133-164.

DOI: 10.1179/1743280411y.0000000014

Google Scholar

[4] W.E. Frazier. Metal additive manufacturing: a review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 23(6) (2014) 1917-1928.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Anderson. Final technical report on laser direct manufacturing (LDM) for nuclear power components. DOE-NE0000542, USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (2015).

DOI: 10.2172/1233481

Google Scholar

[6] A. Riemer, S. Leuders, M. Thöne, H. Richard, T. Tröster, T. Niendorf, On the fatigue crack growth behavior in 316L stainless steel manufactured by selective laser melting. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 120 (2014) 15-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.008

Google Scholar

[7] B. Verlee, T. Dormal, J. Lecomte-Beckers, Density and porosity control of sintered 316L stainless steel parts produced by additive manufacturing. Powder Metallurgy 55(4) (2012) 260-267.

DOI: 10.1179/0032589912z.00000000082

Google Scholar

[8] I. Tolosa, F. Garciandía, F. Zubiri, F. Zapirain, A. Esnaola, Study of mechanical properties of AISI 316 stainless steel processed by selective laser melting,, following different manufacturing strategies. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 51(5-8) (2010) 639-647.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2631-5

Google Scholar

[9] Y.M. Wang, T. Voisin, J.T. McKeown, J. Ye, N.P. Calta, Z. Li, Z. Zeng, Y. Zhang, W. Chen, T.T. Roehling, Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility. Nat.Mater. 17(1) (2018) 63.

DOI: 10.1038/nmat5021

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Zhong, L.-E. Rännar, S. Wikman, A. Koptyug, L. Liu, D. Cui, Z. Shen, Additive manufacturing of ITER first wall panel parts by two approaches: Selective laser melting and electron beam melting. Fusion Eng. Des. 116 (2017) 24-33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.01.032

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Zhong, L. Liu, S. Wikman, D. Cui, Z. Shen, Intragranular cellular segregation network structure strengthening 316L stainless steel prepared by selective laser melting. Journal of Nuclear Materials.470 (2016) 170-178.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.034

Google Scholar

[12] M. Song, M. Wang, X. Lou, et al. Radiation damage and irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking of additively manufactured 316L stainless steels. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 513(2019) 33-44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.10.044

Google Scholar

[13] Design Construction Rules Mechanical Components PWR Nuclear Power Plant.

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM E837-08, Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2008).

DOI: 10.1520/e0837-01e01

Google Scholar

[15] ISO 3651-2: Determination of resistance to intergranular corrosion of stainless steels - Part 2: Ferritic, austenitic and ferritic-austenitic (duplex) stainless steels - Corrosion test in media containing sulfuric acid. ISO 3651-2:1998, International Standards Organization.

DOI: 10.3403/01427645

Google Scholar

[16] P. Zhu, J-G. Zhao, L. Lu. Et al. Effect of Solution Treatment on Microstructure and Grain Boundary Distribution of 316L Stainless Steel Formed by Selective Laser Melting (SLM). Materials Science and Engineering, 44(2019) 121-132.

Google Scholar

[17] W. M. Tucho, V. H. Lysne, H. Austbø, et al. Investigation of effects of process parameters on microstructure and hardness of SLM manufactured SS316L. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 740(2018) 910-925.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.098

Google Scholar

[18] I. Yadroitsev, I. Yadroitsava. Evaluation of residual stress in stainless steel 316L and Ti6Al4V samples produced by selective laser melting. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 10(2) (2015) 1-10.

DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2015.1026045

Google Scholar