Influence of the Active Layer Thickness on Non-Fullerene Polymer Solar Cell Performance

Article Preview

Abstract:

Research on polymer solar cells has attracted increasing attention in the past few decades due to the advantages such as low cost of fabrication, ease of processing, mechanical flexibility, etc. In recent years, non-fullerene polymer solar cells are extensively studied, because of the reduced voltage losses, and the tunability of absorption spectra and molecular energy level of non-fullerene acceptors. In this work, polymer solar cells based on conjugated polymer (PBDB-T: poly [(2,6-(4,8-bis (5-(2-ethylhexyl) thiophen-2-yl)-benzo [1,2-b:4,5-b’] dithiophene))-alt-(5,5-(1’,3’-di-2-thienyl-5’,7’-bis (2-ethylhexyl) benzo [1’,2’-c:4’,5’-c’] dithiophene-4,8-dione))]) and non-fullerene electron acceptor (ITIC: 3,9-bis (2-methylene-(3-(1,1-dicyanomethylene)-indanone)) -5,5,11,11-tetrakis (4-hexylphenyl)-dithieno [2,3-d:2’,3’-d’]-s-indaceno [1,2-b:5,6-b’] dithiophene) were prepared by means of spin-coating method, and the influence of the active layer thickness on the device performance was investigated. PBDB-T: ITIC active layers with different thickness were prepared through varying spin coating speed. It was found that the solar cell performance is best when the active layer thickness is 100 nm, corresponding to the spin coating speed of 2000 rpm. Maximum power conversion efficiency of 7.25% with fill factor of 65%, open circuit voltage of 0.85 V and short circuit current density of 13.02 Am/cm2 was obtained.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 271)

Pages:

106-111

Citation:

Online since:

January 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Güne, H. Neugebauer, N. S. Sariciftci, Conjugated polymer-based organic solar cells, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 1324-1338.

DOI: 10.1021/cr050149z

Google Scholar

[2] B. C. Thompson, J.M.J. Frechet, Polymer-fullerene composite solar cells, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 (2008) 58-77.

DOI: 10.1002/anie.200702506

Google Scholar

[3] G. Li, V. Shrotriya, Y. Yang et al. High-efficiency solution processable polymer photovoltaic cells by self-organization of polymer blends, Nat. Mater. 4 (2005) 864-868.

DOI: 10.1038/nmat1500

Google Scholar

[4] T. Aernouts, T. Aleksandrov, C. Girotto et al. Polymer based organic solar cells using ink-jet printed active layers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (2008) 033306.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2833185

Google Scholar

[5] S. H. Benjamin, S. Monamie et al. Moving through the phase diagram: morphology formation in solution cast polymer-fullerene blend films for organic solar cells, Nano Lett. 5 (2011) 8579 -8590.

DOI: 10.1021/nn2036279

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Uladzimir, E. Tobias, G. Gerhard et al. Relation between absorption and crystallinity of poly(3-hexylthiophene)/fullerene films for plastic solar cells, Chem. Phys. Lett. 418 (2012) 347- 350.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.11.020

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Zhang, J. Y. Zou et al. Indacenodithiophene and quinoxaline-based conjugated polymers for highly efficient polymer solar cells, Chem. Mater. 23 (2011) 2289-2291.

DOI: 10.1021/cm200316s

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Yao, J. H. Hou et al. Effects of solvent mixtures on the nanoscale phase separation in polymer solar cells, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18 (2008) 1783-1789.

DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200701459

Google Scholar

[9] S. D. Oosterhout et al. The effect of three-dimensional morphology on the efficiency of hybrid polymer solar cells, Nat. Mater. 8 (2009) 818-824.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Noriega et al. A general relationship between disorder, aggregation and charge transport in conjugated polymers, Nat. Mater. 12 (2013) 1038-1044.

DOI: 10.1038/nmat3722

Google Scholar

[11] L. Ye et al. From binary to ternary solvent: morphology fine-tuning of D/A blends in PDPP3T-based polymer solar cells, Adv. Mater. 24 (2012) 6335-6341.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201202855

Google Scholar

[12] A. Facchetti, Polymer donor–polymer acceptor (all-polymer) solar cells, Mater. Today, 16 (2013) 123-132.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.04.005

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Lin, X. Zhan, Non-fullerene acceptors for organic photovoltaics: an emerging horizon, Mater. Horiz. 1 (2014) 470-488.

DOI: 10.1039/c4mh00042k

Google Scholar

[14] D. Meng, D. Sun, AJ. Heeger et al. High-performance solution-processed non-fullerene organic solar cells based on selenophene-containing perylene bisimide acceptor, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 375–380.

DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b11149.s001

Google Scholar

[15] H. Bin, Z. G. Zhang, L. Gao, Non-fullerene polymer solar cells based on alkylthio and fluorine substituted 2D-conjugated polymers reach 9. 5% efficiency, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 4657-4664.

DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b01744

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Lin, J. Wang, X. Zhan et al. An electron acceptor challenging fullerenes for efficient polymer solar cells, Adv. Mater. 27 (2015) 1170-1174.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201404317

Google Scholar