The Effect of Different Sand Gradation with Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC)

Article Preview

Abstract:

Advances in concrete material research has introduced to development the new class of concrete which is known as Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC). Due to the most exceedingly awful on nature coarse aggregate quality, UHPC was delivered to success in concrete. This study investigated the effect of differentsand gradation (63-300μm, 300-600μm, 600-1180μm, and normal sand) on compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) of UHPC. The rheology of UHPC mixtures was determined by flow test conducted according to ASTM C1611 and the compression testwas performed to measure concrete compression strength at 7 and 28 days according to BS 1881-116 (1983). To determine the quality of concrete, UPV test were conducted according to BS 1881 part 201 (1986).From the experimental results, the results indicated that sand grading with 600-1180μm obtained the highest in compressive strength and UPV.The compressive strength at 28 days achieved 100 MPawith direct transmission of UPV 4.5% higher than semi direct.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 280)

Pages:

476-480

Citation:

Online since:

August 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Alsalman, C. N. Dang, and W. Micah Hale: Constr. Build. Mater.Vol. 133 (2017), p.135–145.

Google Scholar

[2] F. de Larrard and T. Sedran: Cem. Concr. Res. Vol. 24 (1994), p.997–1009.

Google Scholar

[3] N. V. Mahure,G. K. Vijh,Pankaj Sharma, N. Sivakumar and Murari Ratna: IJEE Vol.04 (2011),pp.871-874.

Google Scholar

[4] M. N. Azreen, I. M. Pauzi, I. Nasharuddin, M. M. Haniza, J. Akasyah, A. D. Karsono, and V. Yen Lei: submitted to American Institute of Physics (2016).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4940092

Google Scholar

[5] Bayan S. Al-Nu'man, Bestoon R. Aziz, Sabr A. Abdulla and Sirwan: International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Vol. 26 (2015).

Google Scholar

[6] M. S. Muhd Norhasri, M. S. Hamidah, A. Mohd Fadzil and O. Megawati: Construction and Building Materials (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.127

Google Scholar

[7] ASTM C1611 Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete.

Google Scholar

[8] C. P. Gu, G. Ye, and W. Sun: China Technol. Sci., Vol. 58 (2015) p.587–599.

Google Scholar

[9] BS 1881-116, Testing concrete. Method for determination of compressive strength of Concrete cubes (1983).

Google Scholar

[10] BS 1881: Part 201: 1986 Guide to the use of non-destructive methods of test for hardened Concrete.

Google Scholar

[11] Deeb, R., A. Ghanbari, and B.L. Karihaloo: Cement Concrete Comp Vol.34 (2012) pp.185-190.

Google Scholar

[12] K.A. Melo and W.L. Repette:Measuring, Monitoring and Modeling Concrete Properties (Springer Publications, Netherlands 2006).

Google Scholar

[13] D. Yoo, H. Shin, and Y.S Yoon: Materials (Basel) Vol. 9 (2016).

Google Scholar

[14] Sonja Fennis, Joop den Uijl and J.C. Walraven: submitted to Ecological concrete (2009).

Google Scholar

[15] Mohammed Abas Abdela Salem and R. K. Pandey: IJMER Vol. 5 (2015).

Google Scholar