Effect of Lime and Organic Binders on Clay Gold-Bearing Ores Filterability

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present work relates to hydrometallurgy, in particular, to gold-bearing clay ores leaching processes. The initial and agglomerated material filterability was studied. Filterability varies in different agglomeration conditions. Influence of cement, lignosulfonate, plastizer (Cemmix CemPlast), lime consumption was investigated. The negative effect of organic reagents additives, such as plasticizer (Cemmix CemPlast) and lignosulfonate, on the filtration process was established. Colmatation of agglomerated ore minimizes at CaO and Ca (OH)2 using as a modifier of the system, also phase separation in the percolation regime and under pressure proceeds without difficulty. Lime and cement joint use in the optimum proportion at clay ore agglomeration under the studied conditions reduces the filtration duration from a few hours to 2-5 minutes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 284)

Pages:

726-730

Citation:

Online since:

October 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.R. Udupa, S.K. Kawatra, M.S. Prasad, Developments in Gold Leaching: A Literature Survey, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 7 (1990) 115-135.

DOI: 10.1080/08827509008952669

Google Scholar

[2] Xie Chang-chun, Xie Ji-yuan, Gold Cyanidation Plants in China, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 6 (1990) 217-228.

DOI: 10.1080/08827509008952662

Google Scholar

[3] K.E. Haque, Gold Leaching from Refractory Ores–Literature Survey, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 2 (1987) 235-253.

DOI: 10.1080/08827508708952607

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Ghorbani, J. Franzidis, J. Petersen, Heap leaching technology – current state, innovations and future directions: A review, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 37 (2016) 73-119.

DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2015.1115990

Google Scholar

[5] W. Robert, Metal extraction from ores by heap leaching, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 28 (1997) 529-545.

DOI: 10.1007/s11663-997-0026-2

Google Scholar

[6] J.A. Eisele, A.F. Colombo, G.E. McClelland, Recovery of Gold and Silver from Ores by Hydrometallurgical Processing, Separation Science and Technology. 18 (1983) 1081-1094.

DOI: 10.1080/01496398308059918

Google Scholar

[7] T.V. Subrahmanyam, K.S. Eric Forssberg, Recovery Problems in Gold Ore Processing with Emphasis on Heap Leaching, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 4 (1989) 201-215.

DOI: 10.1080/08827508908952637

Google Scholar

[8] S.C. Bouffard, Review of Agglomeration Practice and Fundamentals in Heap Leaching, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 26 (2005) 233-249.

DOI: 10.1080/08827500590944009

Google Scholar

[9] E. Peters, The Mathematical Modeling of Leaching Systems, JOM. 43 (1991) 20-26.

Google Scholar

[10] Xiu-xiu Miao, Ai-xiang Wu, Bao-hua Yang, Jin-zhi Liu, Sheng-hua Yin, Hong-jiang Wang, Unsaturated flow and solute transport in a porous column using spherical ore particles, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials. 21 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s12613-014-0873-1

Google Scholar

[11] C.S. White, J.T. Markwiese, Assessment of the potential for in situ bioremediation of cyanide and nitrate contamination at a heap leach mine in central new Mexico, Journal of Soil Contamination. 3 (1994) 271-283.

DOI: 10.1080/15320389409383469

Google Scholar

[12] R.W. Bartlett, Biooxidation Heap Pretreatment of Sulfide Refractory Gold Ore, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 16 (1996) 89-124.

DOI: 10.1080/08827509608914130

Google Scholar

[13] K.A. Natara, Jan Bioprocessing for Enhanced Gold Recovery, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 8 (1992) 143-153.

DOI: 10.1080/08827509208952683

Google Scholar

[14] R.L. McNeamy, Decommissioning of a selected heap leach dump, International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment. 10 (1996) 169-180.

DOI: 10.1080/09208119608964827

Google Scholar

[15] P. Bhakta, B. Arthur, Heap Bio-oxidation and Gold Recovery at Newmont Mining: First-Year Results, JOM. 54 (2002) 31-34.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02709218

Google Scholar

[16] A.B. Vakylabad, M. Schaffie, A. Naseri, M. Ranjbar, Z. Manafi, Optimization of staged bioleaching of low-grade chalcopyrite ore in the presence and absence of chloride in the irrigating lixiviant: ANFIS simulation, Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 39 (1916).

DOI: 10.1007/s00449-016-1586-9

Google Scholar

[17] C.L. Brierley, J.A. Brierley, Progress in bioleaching: part B: applications of microbial processes by the minerals industries, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 97 (2013) 7543-7552.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5095-3

Google Scholar

[18] E. Darezereshki, M. Schaffie, M. Lotfalian, S.A. Seiedbaghery, M. Ranjbar, Use of mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria for the improvement of copper extraction from a low-grade ore, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials. 18 (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/s12613-011-0413-1

Google Scholar

[19] Xiao-dong Hao, Yi-li Liang, Hua-qun Yin, Hong-wei Liu, Wei-min Zeng, Xue-duan Liu, Thin-layer heap bioleaching of copper flotation tailings containing high levels of fine grains and microbial community succession analysis, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials. 24 (2017).

DOI: 10.1007/s12613-017-1415-4

Google Scholar

[20] S.C. Bouffard, D.G. Dixon, Heap biooxidation of refractory gold ores: current state of the art, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 25 (2004) 159-192.

DOI: 10.1080/08827500490472004

Google Scholar