Prediction of Regeneration Chatter Stability of Composite Boring Bar

Abstract:

The deep holes cutting process by metal boring bar is usually limited due to the development of chatter vibration. This is because metal boring bar has not only low bending stiffness but also low structural damping. A chatter stability prediction of composite boring bar under regenerative cutting force is presented. Based on the theory of Euler-Bernoulli beam, the regenerative chatter dynamic model of composite boring bar is proposed, and the solution formula of the limited cutting depth and corresponding spindle speed is given. The dynamic stability lobes of the composite boring bar are obtained by numerical calculation. The results indicate that composite boring bar exhibits efficient chatter stability than metal boring bar. Chatter stability is closely related to fiber ply angle. It is demonstrated that when ply angle is 0o, carbon/ epoxy reaches its critical cutting depth, and for graphite/ epoxy boring bar about 25o of ply angle gives its critical cutting depth, It is also demonstrated that stability boundary decreases as the ratio length and diameter increases. Finally, the prediction results of stability are compared with those from the dynamic stiffness and time-domain response, agreement is found.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 295)
• Pages: 73-83
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.295.73
• Online since: August 2019
• Authors: Yong Sheng Ren*, Ji Shuang Tian, Yu Huan Zhang, Jing Min Ma
• Keywords: Composite Boring Bar, Cutting Chatter, Euler-Bernoulli Beam, Stability Lobes

References

[1] Wang L P, Yang S Z, Yang Z J: Research status and development trend of domestic and overseas in drilling vibration. Machine Design and Manufacturing Engineering, Vol.28(2)(1999),pp.1-4.

[2] Xu Z M: Research on Comprehensive On-line Prediction of Regenerative Cutting Chatter.Ningbo:Ningbo University.(2014).

[3] Nagano S, Koizumi T, Fujii T, etal: Development of a composite boring bar. Composite structures, Vol.38(1-4)(1997),pp.531-539.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(97)00089-5

[4] Lee D G, Hwang H Y, Kim J K: Design and manufacture of a carbon fiber epoxy rotating boring bar. Composite Structure, Vol.60(1)(2003),pp.115-124.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(02)00287-8

[5] Tobias S A: Machine tool vibration. London: Blackie and Sons Ltd.(1965).

[6] Koenigsberger F , Tlusty J: Machine tool structural-Vol.I: stability against chatter. Oxford: Pergamon Press.(1967).

[7] Merrit H E: Theory of self-excited machine tool chatter. Trans.ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,Vol.87(1965),pp.447-454.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3670861

[8] Tita Taro, Translated by Gu C X: Analysis and Countermeasure of Machining Flutter. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers.(1984).

[9] Yang H, Huang X D, Fang C G: The Research on the Ultimate Cutting depth of NC Regenerative Chatter System. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, Vol.5(2008),pp.110-112.

[10] Tony L, Schmitz K, Smith S: Machining dynamics. New York: Springer Science Business Media.(2008).

[11] Ozlu E, Budak E: Analytical modeling of chatter stability in turning and boring operations-part II:Experimental verification. Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol.129(2007),pp.726-732.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2738119

[12] Zhao H W, Wang X J, Yu J Y: Prediction of Stability Limits for Regenerative Chatter System of Machine Tools. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,Vol. 38(5)(2003),pp.547-552.

[13] Cong CX, Liu H, Lv K B: Stability analysis and test for cutting chatter of a slender shaft. Journal of Vibration and Shock,Vol.31(5)(2012),pp.73-76.

[14] Li J H, Xie H L, Sheng Z Q: Modeling and Simulation of Regenerative Chatter Stability in CNC Lathing Process. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), Vol.34(1)(2013),pp.118-122.

[15] Wang H L: Research on Lathe Flutter Analysis and Suppression Method. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University.(2013).

[16] Miguelez M H, Rubio L, Loya J A, et al: Improvement of chatter stability in boring operations with passive vibration absorbers.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences,Vol.52 (10)(2010) , pp.1376-1384.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.07.003

[17] Rubio L, Loya J A, Miguelez M H, et al: Optimization of passive vibration absorbers to reduce chatter in boring. Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing, 41 (1-2) :691-704.(2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.07.019

[18] Zhuang R Y: The Study of Dynamic Stability and Model of Boring Bar. Shijiazhuang:Shijiazhuang Tiedao University.(2016).

[19] S.A. Tobias: Machine-Tool Vibration(Translated by Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University. Beijing: China Machine Press 1977).

[20] Ren Y S, Du X H, Sun S S: Structural damping of thin-walled composite one-cell beams, Journal of Vibration and Shock, Vol.31( 3)(2012),pp.141-146,152.

[21] Saravanos D A, Varelis D, Plagianakos T S, et al: A shear beam finite element for the damping analysis of tubular laminated composite beams. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol.291(2006),pp.802-823.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.06.045

[22] Sino R, Baranger T N, Chatelet E, Jacque T G: Dynamic analysis of a rotating composite shaft. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 68(2008),pp.337-345.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.019

[23] Lee D G, Suh N P: Manufacturing and testing of chatter free boring bars. Ann CIRP.Vol. 37(1988), pp.365-8.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61655-2