Contact Vs. Non-Contact Cleaning: Correlating Interfacial Reaction Mechanisms to Processing Methodologies for Enhanced FEOL/BEOL Post-CMP Cleaning

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to the emergence of sub-7 nm technologies, next generation CMP slurry formulations have continued to increase in additive (nanoparticle and chemistry) complexity to meet stringent device specifications. Therefore, it is essential to probe the molecular level interactions at the nanoparticle/slurry chemistry/substrate interface and in turn correlate them to key performance metrics such as removal rate, post CMP defects, and planarization efficiency. This work will address key interactions through a series of case studies focusing on the role of supramolecular structure and cleaning method (i.e. contact vs. non-contact) during STI post-CMP cleaning, probing the impact of supramolecular structure and mode of cleaning relevant to Cu post-CMP, and development of a biomimetic matrix with chemical activity to act as a brush in STI post-CMP cleaning processes. Results show in both BEOL and FEOL post-CMP cleaning there is a strong correlation to the delivery and “soft” nature of the chemistry to allow for effective particle removal at low mechanical force and prevent further defect formation. Furthermore, this work shows a clear correlation between supramolecular structure and particle removal efficiency under both contact and non-contact post-CMP processes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 314)

Pages:

237-246

Citation:

Online since:

February 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.R. Schaller, Moore's law: past, present and future, Spectrum, IEEE. 34 (1997) 52–59.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Shalf, The future of computing beyond Moore's Law, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 378 (2020).

Google Scholar

[3] R.K. Singh, R. Bajaj, Advances in Chemical-Mechanical Planarization, MRS Bull. 27 (2002) 743–751.

DOI: 10.1557/mrs2002.244

Google Scholar

[4] F.-C. Chang, S. Tanawade, R.K. Singh, Effects of Stress-Induced Particle Agglomeration on Defectivity during CMP of Low-k Dielectrics, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) H39–H42.

DOI: 10.1149/1.3005778

Google Scholar

[5] S. Armini, C.M. Whelan, M. Moinpour, K. Maex, Copper CMP with Composite Polymer Core–Silica Shell Abrasives: A Defectivity Study, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) H18–H26.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2994631

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Li, Y. Liu, C. Wang, X. Niu, T. Ma, Y. Xu, Role of Dispersant Agent on Scratch Reduction during Copper Barrier Chemical Mechanical Planarization, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 7 (2018) P317–P322.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0101806jss

Google Scholar

[7] N.P. Yerriboina, S. Sahir, S.-Y. Han, K.-M. Han, J.-G. Park, The Adhesion and Removal Mechanism of Ceria Particles for STI Post-CMP Cleaning Process, ECS Trans. 92 (2019) 157–164.

DOI: 10.1149/09202.0157ecst

Google Scholar

[8] S. Brems, M. Hauptmann, E. Camerotto, A. Pacco, T.G. Kim, X. Xu, K. Wostyn, P. Mertens, S. De Gendt, Nanoparticle removal with megasonics: A review, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 3 (2014).

DOI: 10.1149/2.004401jss

Google Scholar

[9] R.K. Singh, C. Patel, D. Trio, E. McNamara, C. Wargo, PVA Brush Technology for Next Generation Post-CMP Cleaning Applications, ECS Trans. 33 (2010) 167–173.

DOI: 10.1149/1.3489057

Google Scholar

[10] Y.-K. Hong, D.-H. Eom, S.-H. Lee, T.-G. Kim, J.-G. Park, A.A. Busnaina, The Effect of Additives in Post-Cu CMP Cleaning on Particle Adhesion and Removal, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151 (2004) G756–G761.

DOI: 10.1149/1.1802493

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Sampurno, Y. Zhuang, X. Gu, S. Theng, T. Nemoto, T. Sun, F. Sudargho, A. Teramoto, A. Philipossian, T. Ohmi, Effect of Various Cleaning Solutions and Brush Scrubber Kinematics on the Frictional Attributes of Post Copper CMP Cleaning Process, Solid State Phenom. 145–146 (2009) 363–366.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.145-146.363

Google Scholar

[12] X. Gu, T. Nemoto, A. Teramoto, T. Ito, T. Ohmi, Effect of Additives in Organic Acid Solutions for Post-CMP Cleaning on Polymer Low-k Fluorocarbon, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) H409–H415.

DOI: 10.1149/1.3106106

Google Scholar

[13] J.C. Yang, H. Kim, D.W. Oh, J.H. Won, C.G. Lee, T. Kim, Experimental evaluation of the effect of pad debris size on microscratches during CMP process, J. Electron. Mater. 42 (2013) 97–102.

DOI: 10.1007/s11664-012-2334-9

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Ein-Eli, D. Starosvetsky, Review on copper chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) and post-CMP cleaning in ultra large system integrated (ULSI)-An electrochemical perspective, Electrochim. Acta. 52 (2007) 1825–1838.

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.07.039

Google Scholar

[15] C.F. Graverson, K.M. Wortman-Otto, A.N. Linhart, T.B. Zubi, J.J. Keleher, Development of Soft, Cleaning Chemistries for Enhanced STI Post-CMP Cleaning, ECS Trans. 92 (2019) 165–174.

DOI: 10.1149/09202.0165ecst

Google Scholar

[16] D. Ng, S. Kundu, M. Kulkarni, H. Liang, Role of Surfactant Molecules in Post-CMP Cleaning, J. Electrochem. Soc. 155 (2008) H64–H68.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2806173

Google Scholar

[17] G. Zhang, G. Burdick, F. Dai, T. Bibby, S. Beaudoin, Assessment of post-CMP cleaning mechanisms using statistically-designed experiments, Thin Solid Films. 332 (1998) 379–384.

DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(98)01038-4

Google Scholar

[18] Prosys, Prosys Product Systems Inc., ProSys. (2020). https://www.prosysmeg.com/ Megasonics-Cleaning.html.

Google Scholar

[19] E. Camerotto, S. Brems, M. Hauptmann, J. Lurquin, H. Struyf, P. Mertens, S. De Gendt, Towards an improved megasonic cleaning process: influence of surface tension on bubble activity in acoustic fields, Solid State Phenomena. Vol. 195 (2013) pp.173-176.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.195.173

Google Scholar

[20] H. Wondraczek, A. Kotiaho, P. Fardim, T. Heinze, Photoactive polysaccharides, Carbohydr. Polym. 83 (2011) 1048–1061.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.014

Google Scholar

[21] J. Sun, H. Tan, Alginate-based biomaterials for regenerative medicine applications, Materials (Basel). 6 (2013) 1285–1309.

DOI: 10.3390/ma6041285

Google Scholar

[22] T.A. Davis, B. Volesky, A. Mucci, A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae, Water Res. 37 (2003) 4311–4330.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00293-8

Google Scholar