Sulfuric Acid Reduction in Post-Ash Cleans

Article Preview

Abstract:

Photoresist after implantation is commonly removed either by wet chemical dissolution with sulfuric acid, or by dry ash stripping followed with a wet cleaning. To prevent any photoresist residues, sulfuric acid is still conserved in post ash cleans as additional safety. However, by ensuring sufficient over ash time, SPM (Sulfuric acid Peroxide hydrogen Mixture) chemical need becomes less essential. This paper reevaluates the benefit of SPM after dry ash stripping regarding the environmental context. The advantages of dry ash stripping with clean, compared to wet stripping are outlined. The study introduces prior analyses on defectivity and material consumption. Finally, device matching and yield stability, defined as the main success criteria, are described.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 346)

Pages:

289-295

Citation:

Online since:

August 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] https://criticalmaterials.org/2022-techcet-news/

Google Scholar

[2] K. Fiehrer, The Surface Preparation and Cleaning Conference, Business of clean (2019).

Google Scholar

[3] D. Dekraker, Sol.State.Phenom, 145-146 (2009), 277-280; doi.org/.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP

Google Scholar

[4] K. Christenson, ECS Trans., 11(2) (2007), 197-202;.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2779379

Google Scholar

[5] K. Sasahira, ECS Trans., 108 (2022), 185, doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1149/MA2022-01281263mtgabs

Google Scholar

[6] S. Patil, 28th Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (2017). doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1109/ASMC.2017.7969264

Google Scholar

[7] I. Berry III, , Proceeding of SPIE, 8328 (2012); doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1117/12.918054

Google Scholar

[8] M. Croisy, Sol.State.Phenom, 255 (2016), 111-116; doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ SSP.255.111.

Google Scholar

[9] F. Arnaud, Sol.State.Phenom, 103-104 (2005), 37-40; doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ SSP.103-104.37.

Google Scholar

[10] B. Kirkpatrick, Sol.State.Phenom, 145-146 (2009), 245-248; doi.org/10.4028/ www.scientific.net/SSP.145-146.245.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Yeh, Sol.State.Phenom, 187 (2012), 89-92; doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ SSP.187.89.

Google Scholar