Search results

The chemical composition of the SUS316 is shown in Table 1.
The forging axis was changed 90 degrees pass by pass (Fig. 1).
Results 3-1.
References [1] R.
Metals Vol. 57 (1993), p. 479

Fig.1 shows the schematic representation of the physical model of a typical panel having one bay framed structure developed on one floor.
Fig. 1.
References [1] L.J.
Zhang, Behavior of Steel Plate Shear Wall Connected to Frame Beams Only, International Journal of Steel Structures 11 (4) (2011) 467-479
Zhang, Hysteretic Analysis of Thin Steel Plate Shear Walls, International Journal of Steel Structures 13 (1) (2013) 163-174.

Fig. 1.
Table 1.
Inf. 23 (1), pp. 175–183 (2019)
J. 320 (7233), pp. 479–482 (2000)
J. 14 (1), pp. 179– 184 (1999)

The composition of stainless steel-304 is given in table.1.
Table.1.
BP network is shown in Fig.1.
REFERENCES [1].T.Shimura,K.Takazawa,E.Hatano, Study of magnetic abrasive finishing, Annals of CIRP 39(1) (1990) 325-328
Tool Manuf. 45, 467–479

The schematic diagram and the main structure parameters are shown in figure 2 and table 1 respectively.
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of MR brake with double coils Table 1 Design parameters of a MR brake with double coils[mm] parameters R1 R2 R3 L1 L2 L3 B1 d1 d2 values 10 93 109 99.3 8.3 59.3 5.3 1 1 3 Modified Bingham model description As is well known, the shear stress of the MR fluid under different magnetic flux density and shear strain rate is characterized by the constitutive model.
References [1] K.H.
Huang, The Analysis of Magnetorheological Brake Structure with Multiple Poles, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 479-480: 416-420, 2014
Kordonski, Magnetic properties of carbonyl iron particles in magnetorheological fluids, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/149/1/012051, 2009

The long-used steel 90MnCrV8 belongs to alloyed tool steels [1].
a) b) Fig. 1.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the presented work: 1.
References [1] R.
Sideris, Comparison of wear properties of tool steels AISI D2 and O1 with the same hardness, Tribology International 39 (2006) 479-489

Friction stir welding (FSW) is a new technique for making solid-state welds which is formed by the deformation of material at temperature below the melting point [1-5].
Compared to traditional welding techniques, FSW offers several advantages such as better mechanical properties, less distortion, weight savings, and fewer weld defects [1,2].
Materials and Experimental Procedure Table 1.
References [1] Ren SR, Ma ZY, Chen LQ.
Vol. 479 (2008), p. 293-299

Figure 1.
Table 1.
References [1] A.E.
Bionic Eng. 1 (2004) 9-19
Mater. 24 (2012) 475-479

An Experimental Study on Low Cycle Fatigue of Inconel 617 Super Alloy Jae-Hoon Kim 1,a, Duck-Hoi Kim 1,b, Young-Shin Lee1,c, Young-Jin Choi1,d, Hyun-Soo Kim 1,e and Won-Shik Park2,f 1 Dept. of Mechanical Design Engineering, Chungnam National University, 220 Kung-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-764, Korea 2 Korea Electric Power Research Institute, 103-16 Munji-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-380, Korea a kimjhoon@cnu.ac.kr, bs_kdwh@cnu.ac.kr, cleeys@cnu.ac.kr, d lisajin@cnu.ac.kr, es_khs@cnu.ac.kr, fwspark@kepri.re.kr Keywords: Low cycle fatigue, Inconel 617, Coffin-Manson method, Total strain energy density, Plastic strain energy density Abstract.
Substituting from Eq. 2 into Eq. 1, we obtain: '1 '1 '4 ' '1 '/1 n n K W nn a n p + − =∆ + − σ (4) The recoverable elastic strain energy density, eW∆ , associated with the tensile mode is the area of Fig. 1, and it is given by E E W me 2 22 1 2 max 2 σ σ σ =      + ∆ =∆ for 0min≤σ (5) ( ) 2 2 min max σσ − = for 0min>σ (6) For R=-1, total strain energy density, tW∆ is expressed as below En n KWWW nn a n e p t 2'1 '1 '4 2 max ' '1 '/1 σ σ + + − =∆+∆=∆ + − (7) Results and Discussion The
Coffin-Manson equations for test materials are represented in Table 1.
Conclusions (1) The low cycle fatigue life for base material of Inconel 617 super alloy is slightly increased compared to those of welded materials
References [1] ASTM: Manual on Low Cycle Fatigue Testing (ASTM, USA 1969)

Since the total heat input for Sample I and II are the same, holding time for Sample I is 1.5s which is slightly larger than 1.0s for Sample II.
As discussed, the measurement location was chosen at 1.6mm below the top furface as depicted in a red line.
The following findings are worth noting: 1.
N00014-10-1-0479 at UNO.
Reference [1] P.