Sort by:
Publication Type:
Open access:
Publication Date:
Periodicals:
Search results
Online since: October 2011
Authors: Iis Sopyan, Mohamad Yatim Norazlina, Chantara Thevy Ratnam, Yusof Faridah
Ratnam et al. [7] reported earlier that irradiation-induced reactions occur both in double bond and epoxy regions of ENR.
According to Datta et al. [10] and Banik and Bhowmick [11], oxidative crosslinking and chain scission are believed to be prevailing reactions.
According to Ang et al. [15], the irradiation-induced crosslinking in polymers is often reflected by the hardness of the irradiated sample.
This is similar to irradiated ENR50 which have been studied by Ratnam et al. [7] who observed that the hardness of ENR50 was increased with irradiation.
References [1] Allaoui, A. & El Bounia, N.: eXPRESS Polymer Letters (2009), 3(9), p. 588-594
According to Datta et al. [10] and Banik and Bhowmick [11], oxidative crosslinking and chain scission are believed to be prevailing reactions.
According to Ang et al. [15], the irradiation-induced crosslinking in polymers is often reflected by the hardness of the irradiated sample.
This is similar to irradiated ENR50 which have been studied by Ratnam et al. [7] who observed that the hardness of ENR50 was increased with irradiation.
References [1] Allaoui, A. & El Bounia, N.: eXPRESS Polymer Letters (2009), 3(9), p. 588-594
Online since: September 2011
Authors: Jing Bo Liu, Dong Dong Zhao, Wen Hui Wang
The calculation selected three recorded motions: El Centro motion, Turkey motion and Loma Prieta motion.
Correlation of PGRAD and PGA Wave motions El Centro Turkey Loma Prieta PGA/g 0.2 0.2 0.2 PGRD/mm 64.18 59.45 64.58 PGA/g 0.4 0.4 0.4 PGRD/mm 137.12 95.54 156.5 PGA/g 0.55 0.55 0.55 PGRD/mm 192.25 156.72 220.77 Fig. 4 presents curve of stress as function of PGRD at A-A part and B-B part of the column in the upper and bottom stories of Section Ⅰ.
[8] Hashash Y M A, Hook J J, Schmidt B, et al.
Correlation of PGRAD and PGA Wave motions El Centro Turkey Loma Prieta PGA/g 0.2 0.2 0.2 PGRD/mm 64.18 59.45 64.58 PGA/g 0.4 0.4 0.4 PGRD/mm 137.12 95.54 156.5 PGA/g 0.55 0.55 0.55 PGRD/mm 192.25 156.72 220.77 Fig. 4 presents curve of stress as function of PGRD at A-A part and B-B part of the column in the upper and bottom stories of Section Ⅰ.
[8] Hashash Y M A, Hook J J, Schmidt B, et al.
Online since: April 2020
Authors: Erizal Erizal, Alwan Hafid, Milawati Aini, Bustomi Ahmad, Ria Barleany Dhena
Kamoun, El-R.S.
El-Meligy and M.S.M.
Alim, N.
El-Meligy and M.S.M.
Alim, N.
Online since: August 2013
Authors: Oksana Lebedeva, Yury Pozhidaev, Evgenya Sipkina, Alexandra Chesnokova, Nikolay Ivanov
El-Nahhal and N.
El-Ashgar: Journal of Organomet.
Likhachev and A.L.
El-Ashgar: Journal of Organomet.
Likhachev and A.L.
Online since: July 2014
Authors: Ling Zhang, Bo Tao Ma, Jia Qi Ge, Zhi Zhong Guan, Ming Zhu Wang, Man Sheng Zhang
Seismic waves are selected in accordance with JGJ3-2010, including El-Centro wave (1979), Taft wave, Wenchuan wave (measure point: Zhonghe, Chengdu) and an artificial wave suitable for Type II site, for time-history analysis and table test.
Table 4 Displacement at cantilever end under rare seismic actions Seismic wave deflection/mm Drift Artificial 86.87 1/259 Wenchuan 82.92 1/271 EL Centro 87.31 1/258 Taft 94.31 1/239 Note: the long-span is 22.5m.
References [1] Shu Wang, Mingzhu Wang, Guojun Zhang, et al: Research on the Static Force and Seismic Performance Design of a Multi-storey Large Cantilever Steel Structure.
Table 4 Displacement at cantilever end under rare seismic actions Seismic wave deflection/mm Drift Artificial 86.87 1/259 Wenchuan 82.92 1/271 EL Centro 87.31 1/258 Taft 94.31 1/239 Note: the long-span is 22.5m.
References [1] Shu Wang, Mingzhu Wang, Guojun Zhang, et al: Research on the Static Force and Seismic Performance Design of a Multi-storey Large Cantilever Steel Structure.
Online since: October 2011
Authors: Qin Sun, Xue Ling Fan
Although the attractive features of S-FEM were previously discussed by applying to crack problems by Fish [3-5], Nakasumi [6] and Okada et al.[7], there are few research about its effectiveness on analysis of the composite delamination problems.
Properties of the HTA-1200 Carbon/epoxy prepreg EL (GPa) ET (GPa) vLT (GPa) GLT (GPa) 134 9.46 0.31 3.57 TABLE II.
Properties of the T-400 Carbon/epoxy prepreg EL (GPa) ET (GPa) vLT (GPa) GLT (GPa) 74.1 74.1 0.054 4.27 Figure 4.
Properties of the HTA-1200 Carbon/epoxy prepreg EL (GPa) ET (GPa) vLT (GPa) GLT (GPa) 134 9.46 0.31 3.57 TABLE II.
Properties of the T-400 Carbon/epoxy prepreg EL (GPa) ET (GPa) vLT (GPa) GLT (GPa) 74.1 74.1 0.054 4.27 Figure 4.
Online since: August 2017
Authors: Panpailin Seeharaj, Kittisak Choojun, Naratip Vittayakorn, Patchara Pasupong
Since the crystallite size of nanocrystalline CoFe2O4 obtained from this study (12-13 nm) was much smaller than that of the critical single domain size of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles reported by Qu et al. [14], at
34 nm, therefore, the magnetic property of the nanocrystalline CoFe2O4 in this study was probably controlled by the numbers of magnetic moments containing in the small nanocrystal (single domain) and the high spin canting and spin disorder occurring at the nanocrystal surface.
El-Okr, M.A.
El-Okr, M.
El-Okr, M.A.
El-Okr, M.
Online since: August 2013
Authors: Jun Zheng, Xia Yu Hua, Ya Qian Yang, Wen Xin Hu
The regulation function of choosing resource and its limitation conditions are as follow:
res(e) = A ∗ time cost(e) + C ∗ delay(e) (1)
B ∗ delay(e)
time_cost(e)EL (2)
delay(e)
- TL EL and DL are their boundary regulation conditions and will have different value in different environments.
Stutzle, The ant colony optimization metaheuristic: Al gorithms, applications, and advances, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science , 2003, pp.251–286
Online since: October 2025
Authors: Muhammad Shofuwan Anwar, Jans Hendry, Yusuf Purna Yudhanto
El Hammoumi, and A.
El Ghzizal, “The most used MPPT algorithms: Review and the suitable low-cost embedded board for each algorithm,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 246. p. 118983 (2020)
Al-Haddad, and M.
El Ghzizal, “The most used MPPT algorithms: Review and the suitable low-cost embedded board for each algorithm,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 246. p. 118983 (2020)
Al-Haddad, and M.
Online since: February 2011
Authors: Juan He, Chang Hui Yang
Thomas, et al.Adv.
[5] Yongxin LI, Yimin CHEN, Xinyang HE, et al.
[7] Qiang Zeng, Kefei Li, Teddy Fen-Chong,et al.
[13] Gamal M.S.El Shafei, Christine A.Philip, Nabawaya A.Moussa.
[14] Ahmad, A.L.
[5] Yongxin LI, Yimin CHEN, Xinyang HE, et al.
[7] Qiang Zeng, Kefei Li, Teddy Fen-Chong,et al.
[13] Gamal M.S.El Shafei, Christine A.Philip, Nabawaya A.Moussa.
[14] Ahmad, A.L.