Authors: Els Kesters, Marcel Lux, Joris Pittevils, Jonas Baeyens, Guy Vereecke, Christina Baerts, Denis Shamiryan, Herbert Struyf
Abstract: All-wet processes are gaining a renewed interest for the removal of post-etch photoresist (PR) and Bottom AntiReflective Coating (BARC) in the back-end-of-line (BEOL) semiconductor manufacturing, as plasma ash, traditionally used to remove the PR and BARC layer after etch, cause damage to the low-k dielectric. This study investigates the modification of 193 nm post-etch PR and BARC layer by UV irradiation, that can be used as an intermediate step to enhance PR and BARC wet strip by O3/H2O.
219
Authors: Tae Gon Kim, Quoc Toan Le, Samuel Suhard, Marcel Lux, Guy Vereecke, Martine Claes, Herbert Struyf, Stefan De Gendt, Paul W. Mertens, Marc Heyns
Abstract: Atomic force microscope (AFM) with inclined sample measurement and hydrophobic functionalized AFM probe was used to visualize the sidewall of low-k pattern and allowed to characterize the hydrophobic characteristics on the sidewall after low-k etch. To functionalized the AFM probe, 1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane (FDTS) as a hydrophobic film was coated on an AFM probe. Because of the magnitude of the phobic-phobic interaction force and the tip forced to make a phase shift. Using this technique the visualization and characterization of the etch residue on the low-k sidewall can be successfully performed. It is shown that the investigation toward an effective chemical clean for the etch residue removal could be applicable.
197
Authors: Quoc Toan Le, Els Kesters, L. Prager, Martine Claes, Marcel Lux, Guy Vereecke
Abstract: In Back-End-of-Line processing, the remaining photoresist layer after plasma etch is traditionally removed using a plasma process. Plasma process was reported to induce damage to porous dielectric [1-3]. To minimize damage to low-k material, wet alternative methods of removal of photoresist layer on porous low-k dielectrics are gaining a renewed interest [4]. However, the presence of a “crust” generated by etch plasma at the photoresist surface makes it impossible to completely remove by a pure organic solvent. Indeed, the crust, most likely composed of crosslinked polymer, is not soluble in organic solvents [5]. For this reason, a UV pre-treatment is investigated to break cross-links in the crust or to modify the crust to enhance removal efficiency with solvent stripping in more advanced generations.
323
Authors: Martine Claes, Quoc Toan Le, J. Keldermans, Els Kesters, Marcel Lux, A. Franquet, Guy Vereecke, Paul W. Mertens, M.M. Frank, Robert Carleer, P. Adriaensens, D. Vanderzande
325
Authors: Sonja Sioncke, Marcel Lux, Wim Fyen, Marc Meuris, Paul W. Mertens, Antoon Theuwis
173
Authors: Rita Vos, Els Kesters, Sylvain Garaud, R. De Waele, Karine Kenis, Marcel Lux, H. Kraus, James Snow, Denis Shamiryan, Gabriela Catana, W. Deweerd, T. Schram, S. DeGendt, Paul W. Mertens
Abstract: In this work the removal of different metallic and particulate contaminants relevant for high-k/metal gate processing is studied. Best cleaning efficiency of both silicon and nitride substrates is achieved using a HF/HNO3-based cleaning resulting in a particle removal efficiency higher than 90% and metal removal down to 1010 at/cm2.
241
Authors: Guy Vereecke, Frank Holsteyns, Sophia Arnauts, S. Beckx, P. Jaenen, Karine Kenis, M. Lismont, Marcel Lux, Rita Vos, James Snow, Paul W. Mertens
Abstract: Cleaning of nanoparticles (< 50nm ) is becoming a major challenge in semiconductor manufacturing and the future use of traditional methods, such as megasonic cleaning, is questioned. In this paper the capability of megasonic cleaning to remove nanoparticles without inflicting damage to fragile structures is investigated. The role of dissolved gas in cleaning efficiency indicates that cavitation is the main cleaning mechanism. Consequently gas mass-balance analyses
are needed to optimize the performance of cleaning tools. When gas is dissolved in the cleaning present tools can remove nanoparticles down to about 30 nm using dilute chemistries at low temperature. Ultimate performance is limited by cleaning uniformity, which depends on tool design and operation. However no tool reached the target of high particle removal efficiency andlow damage. Significantly lower damage could only be obtained by decreasing the power, at the cost of a lower cleaning efficiency for nanoparticles. The development of damage-free megasonic is
discussed.
141
Authors: Kai Dong Xu, Rita Vos, Guy Vereecke, Marcel Lux, Wim Fyen, Frank Holsteyns, Karine Kenis, Paul W. Mertens, Marc Heyns, Chris Vinckier
161
Authors: Rita Vos, Marcel Lux, Sophia Arnauts, Karine Kenis, M. Maes, Bart Onsia, James Snow, Frank Holsteyns, Guy Vereecke, Paul W. Mertens, Marc Heyns, O. Doll, A. Fester, Bernd O. Kolbesen, T. Hackett, Mark Hoffman
27
Authors: Rita Vos, Marcel Lux, Thierry Conard, H. De Witte, Paul W. Mertens, Marc Heyns, Z. Hatcher
43