Discrepancies between Management and Labor Perceptions of Construction Site Safety

Abstract:

This paper analyses the construction safety climate awareness gap between management and labor. We first review recent developments in construction hazards in Taiwan, integrating factors taken from safety climate-related studies. We then develop five measurement dimensions and devise a 32 question “Construction Staff Safety Climate Awareness survey. Results are subjected to SPSS17.0 to statistical analysis to explore the awareness gap for safety climate among construction personnel. Research results show that management is more aware than labor of safety climate issues, with the smallest awareness gap occurring in the “assist fellow peers” dimension, and the largest occurring in “risk decision-making”. Pearson analysis showed no significant correlation between risk decision-making and assist fellow peers behavior. Survey results show positive correlations among the measurement dimensions (good safety attitude, safety training and policy, risk decision-making, safety commitment and communication, and assist fellow peers). Tukey comparison of results shows an awareness gap between management and labor in terms of worksite safety, with a particularly large gap regarding risk decision-making. Risk decision-making, training and policies, commitment and communications are all positively correlated. This will allow for the strengthening of safety training and the development of a code of practice by which the overall safety climate can be effectively enhanced, thus reducing the accident rate.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 174-177)
• Pages: 2950-2956
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.174-177.2950
• Online since: May 2012
• Authors: Wei Tong Chen, Shu Shun Liu, Sing Wei Liou, Wen Zheng Sun
• Keywords: Construction Safety, Construction Site, Management and Labor, Safety Climate

References

[1] Fu, H. Fu, Y. Lin, F. Chang: Industry Safety Technology April (2008), pp.2-6.

[2] D. Dejoy: Journal of safety research Vol. 16 (1985), pp.61-71.

[3] D. Dejoy: Journal of safety research Vol. 25 (1994), pp.3-17.

[4] R. Asfahl: Industrial Safety and Health Management (Prentice-Hall, USA 1984)

[5] R.C. Thompson, T.F. Hilton, L.A. Witt: Journal of safety research Vol. 29 (1998), pp.15-24.

[6] A. Neal, M.A. Griffin: Australian Journal of Management Vol. 27 (2002), pp.67-75.

[7] M.T. Tsai, B.M. Chen, L.M. Chuang, H.C. Tsai: Journal of Human Resource Management Vol. 3 (2003), pp.127-152.

[8] A. Andi: Civil Engineering Dimension Vol. 10 (2008), pp.1-6.

[9] C.R.C. Hassan, O.J. Basha, W.H.W. Hanafi: Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 2 (2007), pp.271-279.

[10] W.T. Chen, C.S. Lu, Y.H. Huang: Journal of Marine Science and Technology Vol. 19 (2011), pp.398-408.

[11] C.W. Cheng, S.S. Leu, C.C. Lin, C. Fan: Safety Science Vol. 48 (2010), pp.698-707.

[12] C.W. Cheng, C.C. Lin, S.S. Leu: Safety Science Vol. 48 (2010), pp.436-444.

[13] W.C. Wang, J.J. Liu, S.C. Chou: Automation in Construction Vol. 15 (2006), pp.341-354.

[14] I.W.H. Fung, C.M. Tam, C.F. Tung, A.S.K. Man: International Journal of Project Management Vol. 23 (2005), p.504–512.

[15] W.C. Huang, W.T. Chen in: Proceedings of the 12th Construction Engineering & Management Conference, edited by SL Fan/Taiwan Shoufu University, Taiwan, Kaohsiung.

[16] Z. Gan: Investigating the Construction Accident Cognition of the Work Site Management, (National Yunlin University of Sci. & Tech., Taiwan 2008).

[17] L.J. Cronbach: Psychometrika Vol. 16 (1951), pp.297-334.

[18] J. Nunnally: McGraw-Hill Review Vol. 27 (1967), pp.86-98.