Influences of Surface Roughness of Steel Substrate on Bond Strength of Fiber Woven Composite

Article Preview

Abstract:

The influences of metal surface roughness on the shear strength and peel strength of fiber woven composites (FWC) were studied. Test results show that the metal surface roughness have an important impact on the shear strength and peel strength of FWC. Higher or lower surface roughness can reduce the adhesive strength of FWC. When the best roughness is 0.8, the maximum peel strength and shear strength of FWC are obtained, which ensure the operation reliability and enough life of the spherical plain bearing (SPB) with self-lubrication fabric liner.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

258-263

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. W. Yacout, A. S. Ismaeel and S. Z. Kassab: Tribol. Int. Vol. 40 (2007), p.522.

Google Scholar

[2] B. C. Kim and D. G. Lee: Compos. Struct. Vol. 89 (2009), p.102.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Germaneau, F. Peyruseigt and S. Mistou: Opt. Laser. Eng. Vol. 48 (2010), p.676.

Google Scholar

[4] B. C. Kim and D. G. Lee: Compos. Struct. Vol. 87 (2009), p.71.

Google Scholar

[5] C. S. White, U.S. Patent 2, 804, 886. (1957).

Google Scholar

[6] R. D. Stanhope, U.S. Patent 3, 055, 788. (1962).

Google Scholar

[7] J. P. Sargent: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol. 14 (1994), p.21.

Google Scholar

[8] J. A. Bishopp: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol. 4 (1984), p.153.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Y. Rhee, J. H. Yang: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 63 (2003), p.33.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Azari, M. Papini and J. K. Spelt: Eng. Fract. Mech. Vol. 78 (2011), p.153.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Azari, M. Papini and J. K. Spelt: Eng. Fract. Mech. Vol. 78 (2011), p.138.

Google Scholar

[12] B. Henriques, S. Faria and D. Soares: Mat. Sci. Eng. C -Bio. S. Vol. 33 (2013), p.557.

Google Scholar

[13] R. Rechner, I. Jansen and E. Beyer: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol. 30 (2010), p.595.

Google Scholar

[14] L. F. M. da Silva, R. J. C. Carbas, G. W. Critchlow, M. A. V. Figueiredo and K. Brown: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol. 29 (2009), p.621.

Google Scholar

[15] A. M. G. Pinto, A. G. Magalhães, F. G. da Silva and A. P. M. Baptista: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol. 28, (2008), p.452.

Google Scholar